Ref. Ares(2020)937049 - 13/02/2020
Ref. Ares(2020)1335408 - 03/03/2020
From:
@google.com>
Sent:
lundi 6 janvier 2020 12:18
To:
(JUST);
Cc:
;
(JUST);
(JUST);
(JUST)
Subject:
Re: meeting with
, Google's
Dear Mr
,
First of all let me wish you Happy New Year! Sincere apologies for a slow reaction to your
message following our meeting with
but as you know
operates outside of
Google, as a part of a broader
family.
I can now share the details of a colleague at
o that will be able to respond to your queries.
,
, copied in this exchange will be keen to
schedule a phone call with you and your team in the near future and of course based on your
availability.
Thanks for your patience and wishing you all the best for the new year.
Kind regards,
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 6:12 PM <
@ec.europa.eu> wrote:
Lieber Herr
Thank you for our interesting meeting on liability for AI and your kind offer to provide more
information on Google’s/
experience with autonomous vehicles. As you already know, the
European Commission is looking into the effects of new technologies, such as AI and Internet of Things
on the existing European and national civil liability frameworks. The European AI Strategy, which was
adopted in 2018, is based on three pillars: boosting the uptake of AI, preparing the socio-economic
changes and ensuring an appropriate ethical and legal framework. An expert group was set up to assess
if the existing liability rules are fit to the challenges of the new technologies.
In this context, we would be very interested to learn about Google’s/
’s practical experience
related to AI and potential liability issues.
We would like to understand better the regulatory environment with regard to liability for
Google’s/
’s tests with self-driving cars. In particular, we would be interested in the following
issues:
- Have specific rules on liability been enacted for the testing of
self-driving cars? Who is
liable in case of an eventual accident towards the victim? As to more detailed questions, could
the victim choose between different claims (e.g. against the company which operates the car
or the manufacturer of the car or the developer of the software which steers the self-driving
function)? Which conditions apply for a successful claim? Is there any difference between
claims for personal injury and claims for damage to property? Which defensives could the liable
person invoke to defend himself against liability? Is the liability capped at a certain amount? If
so, is this cap different from a cap for “traditional” cars?
- Do the rules provide for an insurance obligation? If so, which person has to acquire insurance
coverage and who are the insured? Do insurance companies offer respective policies?
- Do you have any practical experience with the application of liability rules for self-driving
cars?
We would be most grateful if you could share this information with us. For the benefit of sound policy-
making, it is extremely valuable to exchange views with a business which has practical experience, in
order to understand better market developments.
Thank you very much in advance
Mit besten Grüβen
European Commission
DG Justice
Unit A2- Contract Law
rue Montoyer 59
B-1049 Brussels
From:
@google.com>
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2019 3:15 PM
To:
(JUST) <
@ec.europa.eu>
Cc:
@google.com>
Subject: Re: meeting with
, Google's
Sehr geehrter Herr
Vielen Dank für Ihre Bereitschaft zu einem Meeting. Als Ergebnis eines akademischen
Nebenprojektes habe ich
einen wissenschaftlichen Artikel
veröffentlicht:
Der Artikel vertritt
meine persönlichen Meinungen. Und auch wenn er im Kontext des Gesundheitswesens
steht, befasst er sich natürlich auch mit KI im weiteren Sinne. Er enthält insbesondere
auch ein prominentes Kapitel zu Haftungsfragen. Ich hoffe, Sie finden den Artikel
nützlich.
Ich freue mich auf unser Meeting und verbleibe mit den besten Grüssen
The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location.
• Google
This email and the information it contains are confidential and may be privileged. If you have received this email in error
please notify me immediately and do not copy it for any purpose, or disclose its contents to any other person. Google
does not in every case accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message as it has been transmitted over a
public network. If you suspect the message may have been intercepted or amended please call me. Thanks.
Am Mo., 23. Sept. 2019 um 14:22 Uhr schrieb
@google.com>:
Thank you so much for your availability.
Looking forward to the meeting on the 9th.
All best,
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 2:13 PM
@ec.europa.eu> wrote:
From:
@google.com>
Date: 13 September 2019 at 10:35:50 GMT+2
To: <
@ec.europa.eu>
Cc:
@google.com>
Subject: Meeting request Google
Dear Mr
,
I hope this email finds you well.
I'm reaching out to request a meeting with
, Google's
on 9 October in Brussels.
would be keen to continue the
discussion with you following the meeting in April in particular in the context of the
forthcoming EU AI regulation. He'll be in Brussels on 9 October to speak at VUB
Seminar, and would be available to meet you anytime 9.30-11.00 or 15.00-18.00.
Thank you for considering.
Kind regards,
I
Googl
@google.com
|
Follow us on Twitter @googleeurope This email may be confidential or privileged. If you received this communication by mistake, please don't forward it to anyone else but
please do delete all copies/attachments and let me know that it went to the wrong person. Thanks.
--
|Google
@google.com |I
Follow us on Twitter @googleeurope This email may be confidential or privileged. If you received this communication by mistake, please don't forward it to anyone else but
please do delete all copies/attachments and let me know that it went to the wrong person. Thanks.
--
|Google
@google.com |I
Follow us on Twitter @googleeurope This email may be confidential or privileged. If you received this communication by mistake, please don't forward it to anyone else but please do delete all
copies/attachments and let me know that it went to the wrong person. Thanks.
Document Outline