Cestui Que Vie Trust
:Alex Chambó-Sánchez made this Informationsfreiheit request to Gerichtshof der Europäischen Union
Automatic anti-spam measures are in place for this older request. Please let us know if a further response is expected or if you are having trouble responding.
Estimado Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea,
Al amparo del derecho de acceso a documentos contemplado en los tratados de la UE, y desarrollado en el Reglamento 1049/2001, solicito los documentos que contienen la siguiente información:
¿Puede proporcionar información relacionada con el Fideicomiso Cestui Que Vie,
• quién lo instaló
• cuál es su único propósito,
• quién es el beneficiario del Fideicomiso Cestui Que Vie,
• quién es el fideicomisario de Cestui Que Vie Trust,
• ¿Cuánto valor hay en mi cuenta Cestui Que Vie Trust?
• quiénes son los propietarios de mi patrimonio Cestui Que Vie Trust,
• ¿puedo obtener legalmente el título para controlar mi propio fondo fiduciario sin la interferencia del estado?
• La Ley Cestui Que Vie de 1666 establece que cuando regresa de más allá de los mares, su remedio es reclamar su propiedad que está registrada en Fideicomiso,
• ¿La Ley Cestui que vie forma un contrato de adhesión que desconocía, cumpliendo obligaciones y aceptando responsabilidades sin saberlo como fideicomisario del Fideicomiso Cestui Que Vie?
Todos los derechos reservados
Dear Court of Justice of the European Union,
By law, the authority would normally have had to respond promptly and by September 07, 2022
Still waiting for your answers and docs.
Thanks in advance
All rights reserved
After some search in our databases we regret to inform you that it appears
that the Registry of the Court of Justice of the European Union has not
received any request or inquiry from you. We are therefore unable to
provide you with an answer.
We can, however, provide you with some information about the jurisdiction
and the work of the Court, which we strongly suggest you to take into
First, the Court of Justice ensures that in the interpretation and
application of the Treaties the law is observed. The interpretation and
application of provisions of the national law of the Member States do not
fall within its jurisdiction. The Court, moreover, is not a court of
appeal from the national courts, and it can neither set aside nor vary
their decisions. Nor can it deal with complaints relating to violations of
the European Convention on Human Rights by the authorities of the
signatory States; the Court of Justice is not to be confused with the
European Court of Human Rights (see the latter’s website:
Disputes with Member States or their authorities, or between private
persons, fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of the national courts.
This is so even where questions relating to EU law are concerned. A court
of a Member State may, if it considers it necessary to do so, refer
questions concerning the validity or interpretation of EU law to the Court
of Justice for a preliminary ruling, but the parties themselves cannot do
In addition, private persons may bring proceedings against an EU
institution – but not a Member State or a private or legal person – only
before the General Court of the European Union and not before the Court of
Justice. In such proceedings, representation by a lawyer entitled to
practise in a Member State is compulsory.
Second, as far as access to documents held by the Court is concerned, we
would like to draw your attention to the fact that access to documents
held by the Court of Justice in the exercise of its administrative
functions is subject to the Decision of 26 November 2019 of the Court,
which you can find together with all the relevant information on the
Besides, as regards access to documents held by the Cour in the exercise
of its judicial functions, we need to point out that the Court does not
fall under the institutions covered by Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of
the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public
access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents. In
addition, it is the practice of the Court to treat procedural documents as
confidential and not to allow access to procedural documents in pending or
closed cases to persons who are not a party to the case. In fact, although
the Statute of the Court of Justice provides that the hearings are public,
it restricts those entitled to receive communication of procedural
documents to the parties and to the institutions whose decisions are in
dispute. Similarly, the Rules of Procedure provide for procedural
documents to be served only on the parties to the proceedings. Therefore,
neither the Statute of the Court of Justice nor the Rules of Procedure
provide for any third-party right of access to documents submitted to the
Court in court proceedings.
Such documents may only become accessible after 30 years, provided the
conditions laid down in the rules on the Historical Archives of the
European Union are met, and without prejudice to an individual assessment
of each request. For further information, please refer to our website:
For further information concerning the jurisdiction and the work of the
Court, please visit the Court’s website at: www.curia.europa.eu.
If, however, your initial request was addressed to the Registry of the
General Court, we invite you to direct any further enquiries to that
Registry of the Court of Justice
The institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the European Union
process personal data in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 (OJ
2018 L 295, p. 39). Your data have been processed by the Court Registry
([email address]) for the purpose of replying to your
application. A copy of this reply will be kept by the Registry for two
years. For further information, please consult the Court’s website