Dies ist eine HTML Version eines Anhanges der Informationsfreiheitsanfrage 'Commission Decision (EU) 2021/2121 on records management and archives'.




 
Ref. Ares(2022)987750 - 10/02/2022
EUROPEAN COMMISSION 
DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT 
 
Directorate R –Management of Resources  
  The Director 
Brussels,  
AGRI.R.5/ Ares (2020) 1520538 
NOTE FOR THE ATTENTION OF 
 
 DG SG 
Subject: 
Reply to interservice consultation on the draft Decision and 
Implementing Rules on Records Management and Archives 

Decide consultation ref.:     ISC/2020/00857 – DG SG 
Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development gives a positive opinion 
subject to the following comments 
(relevant to the articles/paragraphs mentioned 
below): 
Draft Decision: 
- Article 3 – Definitions: Please include in the Decision definitions of an electronic 
signature, advance electronic signature and qualified electronic signature. 
 
Draft Implementing Rules: 
- Chapter I, point 3: Electronic signatures: Distinctions between electronic signature, 
advance electronic signature and qualified electronic signature are not clear enough. 
Please provide more clarity and explain the difference between the three electronic 
signatures types. Please also give examples of the applications that are used for advanced 
and qualified electronic signatures.  
 
 
 
Georg Haeusler 
(e-signed) 
 
 
 
c.c.: 
AGRI DMOs   
  
 
Commission européenne/Europese Commissie, 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel, BELGIQUE/BELGIË - Tel. +32 22991111