This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Freedom of Information request 'Compromise and split amendments regarding 2022 draft general budget: all sections'.

23 September 2021 at 13:45
VOTING LIST
EMPL budget opinion Voting List
Rapporteur: Lucia Ďuriš Nicholsonová
Concerned
AM
Tabled by
Remarks
Rapp Vote
text
Paragraph 1
CA 1 Rapporteur
If adopted, 8, 10, 13, 11, 12
+
and 9 fall
Paragraph 1
8 Kanev
Falls if CA 1 adopted
+
Paragraph 1
10 Agius Saliba,
Falls if CA 1 or 8 adopted
+
Lalucq, Brglez,
Homs Ginel
Paragraph 1
13 Pereira, Chaibi
Falls if CA 1 or 10 adopted
-
Paragraph 1
11 Rafaela
Falls if CA 1, 8, 10 or 13
+
adopted
Paragraph 1
12 Langensiepen
Falls if CA 1, 8, 10, 13 or 11
+
adopted
Paragraph 1
9 Lexmann
Falls if CA 1, 10, 13 or 11
+
adopted
Paragraph 2
CA 2 Rapporteur
If adopted, 20, 16, 14, 18,
+
15, 17 and 19 fall
Paragraph 2
Addition
Falls if CA 2 NOT adopted
+
1 to CA
If adopted, the words “and
2
economically sustainable”
will be added in paragraph
2, so that paragraph 2 reads

“2. Highlights that the
budget with a strong social
and economically sustainable

dimension…”
Paragraph 2
Addition
Falls if CA 2 NOT adopted
+
2 to CA
If adopted, the word
2
“intersectional” will be
added so that paragraph 2b

reads “insists on the need to
tackle economic, social,
intersectional, territorial,
generational and regional


disparities and
inequalities…”
Paragraph 2
20 Pereira, Chaibi
Falls if CA 2 adopted
+
Paragraph 2
16 Agius Saliba,
Falls if CA 2 or 20 adopted
+
Lalucq, Brglez,
Homs Ginel
Paragraph 2
14 Kanev
Falls if CA 2, 20 or 16
+
adopted
Paragraph 2
18 Langensiepen
Falls if CA 2, 20, 16 or 14
+
adopted
Paragraph 2
15 Lexmann
Falls if CA 2, 20, 16 or 14
+
adopted
Paragraph 2
17 Rafaela
Falls if CA 2, 20, 16 or 18
+
adopted
Paragraph 2
19 Szydło, Rafalska,
Falls if CA 2, 16 or 17
+
de la Pisa Carrión
adopted
Paragraph 2 a
21 Agius Saliba,
+
(new)
Lalucq, Brglez,
Homs Ginel
Paragraph 2 a
22 Pereira, Chaibi
-
(new)
Paragraph 2 b
23 Pereira, Chaibi
-
(new)
Paragraph 3
CA 3 Rapporteur
If adopted, 25, 27, 26, 24,
+
29, 28 and 30 fall
Paragraph 3
25 Lexmann
Falls if CA 3 adopted
+
Paragraph 3
27 Rafaela
Falls if CA 3 adopted
+
Paragraph 3
26 Agius Saliba,
Falls if CA 3, 25 or 27
+
Lalucq, Brglez,
adopted
Homs Ginel
Paragraph 3
24 Kanev
Falls if CA 3 adopted
+
Paragraph 3
29 Szydło, Rafalska,
Falls if CA 3 adopted
+
de la Pisa Carrión
Paragraph 3
28 Langensiepen
Falls if CA 3 or 26 adopted
+
Paragraph 3
30 Pereira, Chaibi
Falls if CA 3 or 25 adopted
+
Paragraph 3 a
31 Pereira, Chaibi
-
(new)

Paragraph 3 b
32 Pereira, Botenga,
-
(new)
Chaibi
Paragraph 4
CA 4 Rapporteur
If adopted, 37, 34, 36, 35
+
and 33 fall
Paragraph 4
37 Pereira, Chaibi
Falls if CA 4 adopted
+
Paragraph 4
34 Agius Saliba,
Falls if CA 4 or 37 adopted
+
Lalucq, Brglez,
Homs Ginel
Paragraph 4
36 Langensiepen
Falls if CA 4, 37 or 34
+
adopted
Paragraph 4
35 Rafaela
Falls if CA 4, 37 or 34
+
adopted
Paragraph 4
33 Lexmann
Falls if CA 4 or 37 adopted
+
Paragraph 4 a
38 Agius Saliba,
Split vote (EPP, Renew)
+
(new)
Brglez, Homs Ginel Part 1
Recalls that
implementation…social and
economic aspects;

Part 2
-
Stresses that adequate
resources…and worker’s
protection;

Paragraph 4 a
39 Pereira, Chaibi
-
(new)
Paragraph 4 b
40 Agius Saliba,
Split vote (EPP)
+
(new)
Lalucq, Brglez,
Part 1
Homs Ginel
Reiterates that the Recovery
and Resilience Facility…and
inclusion

Part 2
0
And stresses that social
objectives…Next Generation
EU;

Part 3
+
Stresses that the
reforms…European Pillar of
Social Rights

Part 4
+
And that the Member
States… within the CSRs

Paragraph 4 c
41 Agius Saliba,
Split vote (Renew)
+
(new)
Lalucq, Brglez,
Part 1
Homs Ginel
Text without the words “at
least 0.25% of ESF+
resources under shared
management in each

programme”
Part 2
0
Falls if 41 Part 1 NOT
adopted

These words “at least 0.25%
of ESF+ resources under
shared management in each

programme”
Paragraph 5
CA 5A S&D, Greens
If adopted, CA 5, 43, 42, 44
0
and 45 fall
Paragraph 5
CA 5 Rapporteur
Falls if CA 5A adopted
+
If adopted, 43, 42, 44 and
45 fall

Paragraph 5
43 Lexmann
Falls if CA 5A or CA 5
+
adopted
Paragraph 5
42 Agius Saliba,
Falls if CA 5A or CA 5
+
Lalucq, Brglez,
adopted
Homs Ginel
Paragraph 5
44 Rafaela
Falls if CA 5A or CA 5
+
adopted
Paragraph 5
45 Langensiepen
Falls if CA 5A, CA 5 or 44
+
adopted
Paragraph 6
CA 6A S&D, Greens
If adopted, CA 6, 47, 48, 46
0
and 49 fall
Paragraph 6
CA 6 Rapporteur
Falls if CA 6A adopted
+
If adopted, 47, 48, 46 and
49 fall

Paragraph 6
47 Lexmann
Falls if CA 6A or CA 6
+
adopted
Paragraph 6
48 Rafaela
Falls if CA 6A or CA 6
+
adopted
Paragraph 6
46 Agius Saliba,
Falls if CA 6A or CA 6
+
Lalucq, Brglez,
adopted
Homs Ginel
Paragraph 6
49 Langensiepen
Falls if CA 6A or CA 6
+
adopted

Paragraph 7
CA 7 Rapporteur
If adopted, 50, 54, 52, 53,
+
51, 55 and 56 A fall
Paragraph 7
50 Kanev
Falls if CA 7 adopted
+
Paragraph 7
54 Langensiepen
Falls if CA 7 or 50 adopted
+
Paragraph 7
52 Agius Saliba,
Falls if CA 7 adopted
+
Lalucq, Brglez,
Homs Ginel
Paragraph 7
53 Rafaela
Falls if CA 7, 50 or 54
+
adopted
Paragraph 7
51 Lexmann
Falls if CA 7 adopted
-
Paragraph 7
55 de la Pisa Carrión
Falls if CA 7, 50 or 52
-
adopted
If adopted, will be changed
as follows : " Underlines the
importance of the revised
application requirements and
eligibility criteria in the EGF
Regulation, and asks for
further lowering the
minimum threshold of
workers made redundant or
of self-employed persons
from 500 to 50;"

Paragraph 7 a
56 A Rafaela
Falls if CA 7 adopted
+
(new)
Technical split :
1st part :

“Recalls the important
role…COVID-19 crisis”
Paragraph 7 a
56 B Rafaela
Technical split :
+
(new)
2nd part:
“Believes Member
States…their
representatives”
Paragraph 8
57 Langensiepen
+
Paragraph 8 a
58 Pereira, Chaibi
-
(new)
Paragraph 9
CA 8 Rapporteur
If adopted, 62, 59, 60, 61
+
and 63 fall
Paragraph 9
62 Langensiepen
Falls if CA 8 adopted
+
Paragraph 9
59 Kanev
Falls if CA 8 adopted
+
Paragraph 9
60 Lexmann
Falls if CA 8 adopted
+

Paragraph 9
61 Agius Saliba,
Falls if CA 8 adopted
+
Lalucq, Brglez,
Homs Ginel
Paragraph 9
63 Szydło, Rafalska,
Falls if CA 8 adopted
+
de la Pisa Carrión
Paragraph 10
64 Agius Saliba,
+
Lalucq, Brglez,
Homs Ginel
Paragraph 10
65 Agius Saliba,
Split vote (EPP)
+
a (new)
Brglez, Homs Ginel Part 1
Acknowledges that the
EU…and economies
Part 2
-
That the wealth
distribution…are also
consolidated

Paragraph 10
66 Agius Saliba,
+
b (new)
Lalucq, Brglez,
Homs Ginel
Paragraph 10
67 Agius Saliba,
-
c (new)
Lalucq, Brglez,
Homs Ginel
Paragraph 10
68 Agius Saliba,
Split vote (Renew)
+
d (new)
Brglez, Homs Ginel Part 1
Highlights that
addressing…virtuous circles
Part 2
-
Rather than negative
feedback loops

Part 3
+
Believes that …to be added
Part 4
-
Demands that, in
order…agreement coverage
Paragraph 10
69 Agius Saliba,
-
e (new)
Lalucq, Brglez,
Homs Ginel
Paragraph 10
70 Agius Saliba,
+
f (new)
Lalucq, Brglez,
Homs Ginel

Paragraph 10
71 Agius Saliba,
+
g (new)
Lalucq, Brglez,
Homs Ginel
Paragraph 11
73 Agius Saliba,
+
Lalucq, Brglez,
Homs Ginel
Paragraph 11
74 Langensiepen
0
Paragraph 11
72 Lexmann
+
Paragraph 11
75 Rafaela
+
a (new)
Paragraph 11
76 de la Pisa Carrión
+
a (new)
Paragraph 12
77 Agius Saliba,
+
Lalucq, Brglez,
Homs Ginel
Paragraph 12
78 Langensiepen
+
Paragraph 13
80 Agius Saliba,
+
Lalucq, Brglez,
Homs Ginel
Paragraph 13
79 Kanev
Consistent with budgetary
+
AM EMPL/5560 which was
adopted on 01.09

Paragraph 13
81 Agius Saliba,
Consistent with budgetary
+
a (new)
Lalucq, Brglez,
AM EMPL/5558 which was
Homs Ginel
adopted on 01.09
Paragraph 13
82 Agius Saliba,
+
b (new)
Lalucq, Brglez,
Homs Ginel
Paragraph 13
83 Agius Saliba,
+
c (new)
Lalucq, Brglez,
Homs Ginel
Recital A
1 Agius Saliba,
-
(new)
Brglez, Homs Ginel
Recital B
2 Agius Saliba,
-
(new)
Lalucq, Brglez,
Homs Ginel
Recital C
3 Agius Saliba,
+
(new)
Lalucq, Brglez,
Homs Ginel

Recital D
4 Agius Saliba,
+
(new)
Lalucq, Brglez,
Homs Ginel
Recital E
5 Agius Saliba,
Consistent with budgetary
+
(new)
Lalucq, Brglez,
AM EMPL/5562 and 5563
Homs Ginel
which were adopted on 01/09
Recital F
6 Agius Saliba,
+
(new)
Lalucq, Brglez,
Homs Ginel
Recital G
7 Agius Saliba,
+
(new)
Lalucq, Brglez,
Homs Ginel
Final vote – Draft as amended (Roll-call vote)