Ceci est une version HTML d'une pièce jointe de la demande d'accès à l'information 'Code of Conduct Group on business taxation - meeting background documents'.


Ref. Ares(2016)2762690 - 14/06/2016
doc 2
Follow up to the study of administrative practices - Final evaluation 
 
 
 
Belgium  
 
Measure aimed at determining the level of taxation of foreign companies 
operating in Belgium, without legal personality or probative accounts 
 
Whilst there are a couple of remaining questions about the application of this 
measure (What costs are included? How long are agreements made for?), no 
member of the Group has expressed particular concern about this measure. 
 
Given the description agreed yesterday, the lack of use of this measure and 
the commitment that it will not be used in the future to replace other measures 
with a positive evaluation, there seems to be little reason to conclude that it 
may significantly affect the location of business within the EU. 
 
Provided that Belgium would commit itself not to reactivate this measure, as 
proposed yesterday (respect the “standstill” irrespective of what will happen to 
other measures currently under consideration by the Code of Conduct Group), 
we would be inclined to accept a negative evaluation of this measure. 
 
 
Luxembourg 
Finance Branches   
 
It has been acknowledged that these double taxation provisions are outdated 
and inappropriate. Given the formulaic split of profits, such a measure may 
significantly affect the location of business and we would conclude that this 
should receive a positive evaluation like the similar measure already 
considered (and indeed any measure of a similar nature). 
 
 
Netherlands  
Non-standard rulings (including Greenfield-rulings)  

 
 
 
 
Concern has been expressed, to a lesser or greater degree, about each of the 
elements of the practices covered by the non-standard rulings. The 
Netherlands delegation has acknowledged that there is less transparency 
about these practices than about the standard rulings, which have received a 
positive evaluation. We therefore conclude that these provisions should 
receive a positive evaluation.  
 
We welcome the fact that the Dutch delegation has already indicated that they 
will review these provisions. 
 
 

United Kingdom 
(Informal) cost-plus rulings
 
 
A number of the members of the Group indicated yesterday that if the UK 
practices ensure a proper and consistent application of the OECD transfer 
pricing rules (case by case analysis, no formulaic approach, regular review) 
then they had no further concerns about this measure. On this basis, we are 
inclined to conclude the measure is not likely to significantly affect the location 
of business and it should receive a negative evaluation. 
 
 
Comparison of cost-plus arrangements 
 
(If necessary) we would distinguish those measures that, at one end of the 
scale, strictly apply elements of the OECD transfer pricing guidelines from 
those that provide formulaic safe harbours and those that, at the other end of 
the scale, also exclude some of the relevant costs.