Christian,

Thanks for your comments which we all took on board, notably

•           Deletion of reference to the reporting of “old” information

•           Reference to the fact that the OLAF fraud notification system can initially be used anonymously (footnote 13)

Attached is a clean version of the text. Once we have your and Jean-Luc's ok on it, we will get the ball rolling.

We will prepare feedback to both organisations once the guidelines are adopted.

René

From: LINDER Christian (CAB-SEFCOVIC)
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 4:54 PM
To: SLOOTJES Rene (HR)
Cc: FEUGIER Jean-Luc (HR); WILLIAMS Karen (HR); SCHIEBLE Christoph (HR)
Subject: RE: Whistleblowing

René,

here are my comments in t-c.

I guess we should give both organisations feedback once the guidelines are adopted as to what and why we took their suggestions into account or not.

C.

 

 


From: SLOOTJES Rene (HR)
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 5:51 PM
To: LINDER Christian (CAB-SEFCOVIC)
Cc: FEUGIER Jean-Luc (HR); WILLIAMS Karen (HR); SCHIEBLE Christoph (HR)
Subject: Whistleblowing
Importance: High

Christian,

Yesterday we received the comments from Public Concern at Work and we have analysed the comments of both Transparency International and PCaW (see enclosed read-out tables).

We have taken on board a limited number of comments – most of their comments were due to a lack of knowledge of our rules (SR articles, duty of loyalty and discretion etc). Enclosed (first document) the guidelines after insertion of the (in our view) acceptable comments. Some other comments can be addressed in FAQ's that we are preparing separately.

Please let us know if you agree. We think an adoption of these guidelines on 27 June could be envisaged – this to avoid the 'summer rush' and to be able to communicate in July (we need to report to the EP on our awareness-raising actions in September). But this means we need to act relatively quickly.

Kind regards, and happy to discuss,

René