Ceci est une version HTML d'une pièce jointe de la demande d'accès à l'information 'Council Presidency sponsorship'.


 
  
 
 
 

Council of the 
 
 

 European Union 
   
 
Brussels, 24 January 2020 
(OR. en) 
    5476/20 
 
 
 
 
LIMITE 

 
API 11 

INF 9 
 
 
OMBUDS 4 
JUR 35 
INST 6 
 
NOTE 
From: 
General Secretariat of the Council 
To: 
Working Party on Information 
Subject: 
Complaint 1069/2019/MIG - Ombudsman's Recommendation  
(sponsorship of the Presidency of the Council of the European Union) 
 
 
1. 
Upon a complaint from Foodwatch International, the Ombudsman addressed on 15 July 2019 
a letter to the Secretary General of the Council and to the President of the European Council 
related to commercial sponsorship of the Presidencies (document ST 12824/19). 
2. 
In its reply to the Ombudsman, approved by Coreper on 23 October 2019 (document 
ST12879/19) , it was explained that a distinction should be made between i) the activities 
from the Presidency in the context of its duties related to the provisions of the Treaty and the 
Council Rules of procedure for which the Presidency has the duty to be neutral and impartial 
and ii) other Presidency activities which do not fall within the institutional framework of the 
Council (such as cultural, touristic and scientific events or informal meetings) which remain 
under the responsibility of the Member State as such. 
3. 
In her draft Recommendation of 6 January 2020 (document ST 5315/20), the Ombudsman 
notes that, although it is held by a Member State, the Council presidency is functionally a part 
of the Council and thus of the EU administration. 
 
5476/20  
 
LD/nb 

 
COMM 2C 
LIMITE 
EN 
 

  
While she acknowledges that the distinction that the Council draws between different 
categories of activities that the Presidency organizes may be useful for clarifying, from an 
internal administrative perspective, whether certain expenses are the responsibility of the 
Council or the Member State holding the Presidency, she contends that such a distinction is 
not perceptible or relevant to the wider public. She therefore considers that it falls to the 
Council to seek to mitigate the risks associated with commercial sponsorship and she finds 
that the Council's stance that it has no responsibility when it comes to commercial 
sponsorship of a Council Presidency and its consequent inaction amounts to 
maladministration. She therefore makes the recommendation that the Council should issue 
guidance to Member States on the issue of sponsorship of the Presidency to mitigate the 
reputational risks to the EU. 
4. 
While the Member State holding the Presidency is responsible with regards to how it will 
finance the costs not covered by the Council's budget, in particular as regards the organization 
of informal meetings, seminars or social and cultural events on the occasion of the 
Presidency, the Council may agree to issue guidance on the conditions to be taken into 
account when having resort to private sponsors to cover some of these costs with a view to 
avoid any actual or perceived conflict of interests and any possible reputational risks for the 
Council arising out of the sponsorship. Such conditions should be assessed by the Member 
State concerned, which may consult with the GSC if it considers it appropriate. The guidance 
may be inserted in the Presidency handbook.1 
5. 
The Working Party for information is invited to comment on the Ombudsman draft 
Recommendation and to provide input on the possibility to issue guidance on this issue to the 
future Presidencies along the lines suggested in this Note. A draft detailed opinion on the 
Recommendation will be prepared on the basis of that input. After consulting the WPI, the 
draft detailed opinion will be submitted to Coreper and Council for approval. 
 
 
                                                 
1 
http://www.mvep.hr/files/file/2018/181212-handbook-of-the-presidency-02-2018-1.pdf 
 
5476/20  
 
LD/nb 

 
COMM 2C 
LIMITE 
EN