RE:- 1) Zambian Independence Act 1964 2)Family Law Act 1986, 3) Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 Section 27 (7) (8A) (10)

Waiting for an internal review by Court of Justice of the European Union of their handling of this request.

Dear European Court of Justice,

Under the right of access to documents in the EU treaties, as developed in Regulation 1049/2001, I am requesting documents which contain the following information:

I, Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee and on behalf of My Wife, Children, Brothers and their Children who are living in the Republic of Zambia do hereby make a request whether the European Court of Justice does receive complaints and incidents for the Events which had occurred in the Republic of Zambia. If you could kindly forward or Transfer this Email to the Appropriate Authority since Section 1 of the Zambia Independence Act 1964 is and has been on the Public Domain, whilst any British Citizen Lawyer-Barrister doesn't have the Legal Right to vote in any type of Elections in the Republic of Malawi and Republic of Zambia.

2. You do have the Hague Convention of June 1970 on Recognition of Divorces and Legal Separations,
Since Section 15 and 16 of the Domicile and Matrimonial Proceedings Act 1973 was a breach of the Zambian Constitution on Freedom of Religion and Conscience.
The Family Law Act 1986 Part 3 Declaration of Marital Status.
There is the Statutory Instrument 1988 No 375, since there had been some delay for bringing the Family Law Act 1986 into force.

3. You do have the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990, Section 27 (7) where, immediately before the commencement of this section, no restriction was placed on the persons entitled to exercise any right of audience in relation to any particular court or in relation to particular proceedings, nothing in this section shall be taken to place any such restriction on any Person.
This was in force between the 1st January 1991 until the 31st December 2009.

3-1. You do have the List of Persons who have been declared as Vexatious Litigants under Section 42 of the Senior Courts Act 1981, Whilst the Date of the Authorization which had been given by the HM Attorney General, HM Solicitor General or a Law Officer on behalf of the HM Solicitor General,
Since it is not the function of any Attorney General to misapply any Parliament Act.

Since my Complaint is in the Public Interests, where I request the European Court of Justice on their Own Motion should look into the complaints, and relief be granted.

4. You must have the decision given in the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, that Malicious Prosecution does apply to Civil and Criminal Proceedings.

5. The Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015 which is a United Kingdom Parliament Act, this has made some changes to the Legislation.

6. Any Citizen Person He/She does have the Legal Right to take private Criminal Prosecutions, if this has been mentioned in any of the Treaties, as when a report is made to the Police, they don't record a crime, they normally say that it is a civil Matter, when it is a Criminal Matter as Official Misconduct in Public Office at Common Law is a Criminal Offence

I thank you in advance and wait to hear from you

Yours faithfully,

Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee

Dear European Court of Justice,

I, Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee and on behalf of My Wife and Children do hereby request your attention that you were required by the Rules to respond within the time limits, If you don't practice the rule of Law, than this shall lead to further Injustice.

There is a Judgment given in the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom today R (On the Application of Miller and Another) Respondents V Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union (Appellant)
Reference by the Attorney General for Northern Ireland
Reference by the Court of Appeal (Northern Ireland) In the Matter of an Application by Raymond McCord for Judicial Review on the 24th January 2017.

You should take this into consideration

Yours faithfully,

Ismail Bhamjee

Dear European Court of Justice,

I, Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee do hereby request your attention that by Law, you were required to acknowledge my request and reply within the period allowed, whilst there has been some delay in your response, please kindly take into consideration of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom judgment given on the 24th January 2017 Hillary Term [2017] UKSC 5

R (On the application of Millar and Another) Respondents) Versus Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union (Appellant)

The Refusal to provide the requested information does amount to breach of Article 10 of the Convention Treaties, whilst you do have the Knowledge of the decisions made under Article 10 of the Convention Treaties, whilst there has been non-disclosure of Article 10 of the Convention Treaties decision given in the United Kingdom in the High Court of Justice Divisional Court in the Month of July 2000. This does cause more expenses and waste more time of the Courts

Yours faithfully,

Ismail Bhamjee

Registry ECJ, Court of Justice of the European Union

In reply to your letter, it seems appropriate to give some information
about the duties and jurisdiction of the Court.

 

The Court of Justice ensures that in the interpretation and application of
the Treaties the law is  observed.  The interpretation and application of
provisions of the national law of the Member States do not form part of
its duties.  Neither can it hear and determine actions for breach of the
European Convention on Human Rights by the authorities of the Signatory
States; the Court of Justice is not to be confused with the European Court
of Human Rights (see the latter's website at: [1]www.echr.coe.int).

 

The Court of Justice is not a court of appeal from the national courts and
cannot declare their judgments void or vary them.

 

Private persons may bring proceedings against an institution of the
European Union only before the General Court and not before the Court of
Justice.  In such proceedings representation by a lawyer entitled to
practice in a Member State is compulsory.

 

Disputes with Member States or their authorities, or between private
persons fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of the national courts.
This is so even where questions of European Union law are concerned.  A
court of a Member State may (or in certain circumstances, must), however,
refer to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling on questions of
European Union law.  The parties themselves have no such right.

 

The Registrar of the Court of Justice is thus unable to take any steps
with regard to your e-mail.

 

For further information regarding the jurisdiction and the work of the
Court, please visit the Court's website at: [2]www.curia.europa.eu

 

 

For the Registrar

 

 

References

Visible links
1. http://www.echr.coe.int/
2. http://www.curia.europa.eu/

Dear Registry ECJ,

I, Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee refer to your response dated the 25th January 2017, whilst it is not very clear from your response since the Republic of Zambia is an Independent Country from the United Kingdom from the 24th October 1964 by an Order in Council, when checking on the List of Countries who are members of the European Union, I believe that the Republic of Zambia and Republic of Malawi which was formerly Nyasaland
as they have not signed any Treaties with the European Court of Justice where you don't have the Jurisdiction Power, where you should forward this to the United Nations General Assembly and the President of the European Union.

Once Independence given can't be taken away:

Yours sincerely,

Ismail Bhamjee

Registry ECJ, Court of Justice of the European Union

In reply to your e-mail, it seems appropriate to give some information about the duties and jurisdiction of the Court.

The Court of Justice ensures that in the interpretation and application of the Treaties establishing the European Communities the law is observed. The interpretation and application of provisions of the national law of the Member States do not form part of its duties. Neither can it hear and determine actions for breach of the European Convention on Human Rights by the authorities of the Signatory States; the Court of Justice is not to be confused with the European Court of Human Rights (see the latter's website at: www.echr.coe.int).

The Court of Justice is not a court of appeal from the national courts and cannot declare their judgments void or vary them.

Private persons may bring proceedings against a Community institution only before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities and not before the Court of Justice. In such proceedings representation by a lawyer entitled to practise in a Member State is compulsory.

Disputes with Member States or their authorities, or between private persons fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of the national courts. This is so even where questions of European Community law are concerned. A court of a Member State may (or in certain circumstances, must), however, refer to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling on questions of Community law. The parties themselves have no such right.

The Registrar of the Court of Justice is thus unable to take any steps with regard to your e-mail.

For further information regarding the jurisdiction and the work of the Court, please visit the Court's website at: www.curia.europa.eu

For the Registrar

To: Registry ECJ
Subject: access to documents request - RE:- 1) Zambian Independence Act 1964 2)Family Law Act 1986, 3) Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 Section 27 (7) (8A) (10)

Dear European Court of Justice,

Under the right of access to documents in the EU treaties, as developed in Regulation 1049/2001, I am requesting documents which contain the following information:

I, Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee and on behalf of My Wife, Children, Brothers and their Children who are living in the Republic of Zambia do hereby make a request whether the European Court of Justice does receive complaints and incidents for the Events which had occurred in the Republic of Zambia. If you could kindly forward or Transfer this Email to the Appropriate Authority since Section 1 of the Zambia Independence Act 1964 is and has been on the Public Domain, whilst any British Citizen Lawyer-Barrister doesn't have the Legal Right to vote in any type of Elections in the Republic of Malawi and Republic of Zambia.

2. You do have the Hague Convention of June 1970 on Recognition of Divorces and Legal Separations,
Since Section 15 and 16 of the Domicile and Matrimonial Proceedings Act 1973 was a breach of the Zambian Constitution on Freedom of Religion and Conscience.
The Family Law Act 1986 Part 3 Declaration of Marital Status.
There is the Statutory Instrument 1988 No 375, since there had been some delay for bringing the Family Law Act 1986 into force.

3. You do have the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990, Section 27 (7) where, immediately before the commencement of this section, no restriction was placed on the persons entitled to exercise any right of audience in relation to any particular court or in relation to particular proceedings, nothing in this section shall be taken to place any such restriction on any Person.
This was in force between the 1st January 1991 until the 31st December 2009.

3-1. You do have the List of Persons who have been declared as Vexatious Litigants under Section 42 of the Senior Courts Act 1981, Whilst the Date of the Authorization which had been given by the HM Attorney General, HM Solicitor General or a Law Officer on behalf of the HM Solicitor General,
Since it is not the function of any Attorney General to misapply any Parliament Act.

Since my Complaint is in the Public Interests, where I request the European Court of Justice on their Own Motion should look into the complaints, and relief be granted.

4. You must have the decision given in the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, that Malicious Prosecution does apply to Civil and Criminal Proceedings.

5. The Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015 which is a United Kingdom Parliament Act, this has made some changes to the Legislation.

6. Any Citizen Person He/She does have the Legal Right to take private Criminal Prosecutions, if this has been mentioned in any of the Treaties, as when a report is made to the Police, they don't record a crime, they normally say that it is a civil Matter, when it is a Criminal Matter as Official Misconduct in Public Office at Common Law is a Criminal Offence

I thank you in advance and wait to hear from you

Yours faithfully,

Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee

-------------------------------------------------------------------

This is a request for access to information under Article 15 of the TFEU and, where applicable, Regulation 1049/2001 which has been sent via the AsktheEU.org website.

Please kindly use this email address for all replies to this request: [FOI #3691 email]

If [ECJ request email] is the wrong address for information requests to European Court of Justice, please tell the AsktheEU.org team on email [email address]

This message and all replies from European Court of Justice will be published on the AsktheEU.org website. For more information see our dedicated page for EU public officials at https://www.asktheeu.org/en/help/officers

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Court of Justice of the European Union,

Please pass this on to the person who reviews confirmatory applications.

I am filing the following confirmatory application with regards to my access to documents request 'RE:- 1) Zambian Independence Act 1964 2)Family Law Act 1986, 3) Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 Section 27 (7) (8A) (10)'.

I request your attention to confirm that you do have The United Nations and Declarations Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples Adopted by General Assembly resolution 1514 (XV) of 14th December 1960

There is also a judgment given very recently in the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom on the 25th October 2017 which has been reported on the United Kingdom Supreme Court {2017] UKSC 65 which was an Appeal from the Court of Appeal {2016] EWCA Civ 2. The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in their Judgment they did mention also that the case of Heath Versus Commissioner of Metropolis {2004} EWCA Civ 943, [2005] ICR 329 was wrongly decided.

A full history of my request and all correspondence is available on the Internet at this address: https://www.asktheeu.org/en/request/re_1...

Yours faithfully,

Ismail Bhamjee