Report Independent Panel of EU Member State Experts on Family Law

The request was successful.

Dear Enlargement (ELARG),

Under the right of access to documents in the EU treaties, as developed in Regulation 1049/2001, I am requesting documents which contain the following information:

The report that was provided to the Romanian Government and the US Embassy in Bucharest, to which reference is made in the below US cable:

" E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/10/2014
TAGS: PREL CASC CVIS RO EUN USEU BRUSSELS
SUBJECT: VERHEUGEN RESPONSE TO DEPUTY SECRETARY ON ROMANIAN
ADOPTIONS

Classified By: Rick Holtzapple, PolOff, Reason 1.4 B/D

¶1. (U) The cabinet of Enlargement Commissioner Gunter
Verheugen has faxed us a letter from the Commissioner to
Deputy Secretary Armitage, replying to the Deputy Secretary's
letter of May 4 on the issue of Romanian adoptions. The full
text of the letter is in para 3 below, and a copy of the
original fax with signature has been faxed to EUR/ERA and
Embassy Bucharest.

¶2. (C) The letter confirms what we already know from the copy
of the report from the Commission to the GoR on the issue
that was provided to Embassy Bucharest. The Commission's
legal experts have told the Romanian government that the
"proposed approach to pursue on the policy of intercountry
adoptions with a very limited exception" is seen as
"essentially in line" with the EU's demands.

¶3. (U) Beginning of Text:

Dear Mr. Secretary of State,

Thank you for your letter of 4 May 2004 on the issue of
intercountry adoptions from Romania.

I would like to clarify that the European Commission is not
against intercountry adoption as such. However, the UN
Convention on the Rights of the Child foresees that
inter-country adoption may be considered only if the child
cannot be placed in a foster or an adoptive family or cannot
in any suitable manner be cared for in the child's country of
origin. This "last resort" provision is consonant with the
provision in the UN convention that refers to the
"desirability of continuity in a child's upbringing and to
the child's ethnic, religious, cultural and linguistic
background."

All Member States of the EU have ratified the UN Convention
on the Rights of the Child and therefore should respect the
above mentioned principles. Therefore the Commission
considers that the moratorium on intercountry adoptions is
necessary as long as no legislation is in force that fully
complies with this convention, and as long as no
administrative capacity exists to implement this legislation.

Following Prime Minister Nastase's request for legal advice
on children's rights and adoption, the Commission set up an
Independent Panel of EU Member State experts on family law.
In its latest report, which I have forwarded to Prime
Minister Nastase, the Panel noted the fundamental change made
by Romania on the issue of intercountry adoption. The
proposed approach to pursue on the policy of intercountry
adoptions with a very limited exception was considered
essentially in line with the UN Convention on the Rights of
the Child.

Our primordial focus must be on getting the system of child
care in Romania right so that we get tot he usual situation
in the Member States of the EU where international adoptions
are the exception. Therefore, the EU has supported Romania
in its efforts to improve the quality of public care for
children. This meant that large residential establishments
were closed down and replaced with a selection of child
protection alternatives ranging from smaller homes and foster
care to day-care centres. Of course there remains work to be
done, but Romania surely has come a long way in resolving the
issue of children in public care.

I have been informed that recently a videoconference on this
issue was held between the Washington State Department and my
services, and that it was considered useful to have both
sides express their respective positions.

Yours sincerely,

/S/
Gunter Verheugen"

http://wikileaks.org/cable/2004/06/04BRU...

Yours faithfully,

Arun Dohle

Arun Dohle left an annotation ()

Deadline: 10 September 2013

Neighbourhood and Enlargement Negotiations

Dear Sir,

Thank you for your request from 20 August 2013. We hereby acknowledge receipt of the below application for access to documents, which was registered on 20 August 2013 under the above mentioned reference number.

In accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents, your application will be handled within 15 working days. The time limit will expire on 10 September 2013. In case this time limit needs to be extended, you will be informed in due course.

Yours faithfully,

The ELARG-ACCDOC team.

-----Original Message-----
From: Arun Dohle [mailto:[FOI #762 email]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 11:03 AM
To: ELARG-ACCDOC
Subject: access to information request - Report Independent Panel of EU Member State Experts on Family Law

Dear Enlargement (ELARG),

Under the right of access to documents in the EU treaties, as developed in Regulation 1049/2001, I am requesting documents which contain the following information:

The report that was provided to the Romanian Government and the US Embassy in Bucharest, to which reference is made in the below US cable:

" E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/10/2014
TAGS: PREL CASC CVIS RO EUN USEU BRUSSELS
SUBJECT: VERHEUGEN RESPONSE TO DEPUTY SECRETARY ON ROMANIAN
ADOPTIONS

Classified By: Rick Holtzapple, PolOff, Reason 1.4 B/D

¶1. (U) The cabinet of Enlargement Commissioner Gunter
Verheugen has faxed us a letter from the Commissioner to
Deputy Secretary Armitage, replying to the Deputy Secretary's
letter of May 4 on the issue of Romanian adoptions. The full
text of the letter is in para 3 below, and a copy of the
original fax with signature has been faxed to EUR/ERA and
Embassy Bucharest.

¶2. (C) The letter confirms what we already know from the copy
of the report from the Commission to the GoR on the issue
that was provided to Embassy Bucharest. The Commission's
legal experts have told the Romanian government that the
"proposed approach to pursue on the policy of intercountry
adoptions with a very limited exception" is seen as
"essentially in line" with the EU's demands.

¶3. (U) Beginning of Text:

Dear Mr. Secretary of State,

Thank you for your letter of 4 May 2004 on the issue of
intercountry adoptions from Romania.

I would like to clarify that the European Commission is not
against intercountry adoption as such. However, the UN
Convention on the Rights of the Child foresees that
inter-country adoption may be considered only if the child
cannot be placed in a foster or an adoptive family or cannot
in any suitable manner be cared for in the child's country of
origin. This "last resort" provision is consonant with the
provision in the UN convention that refers to the
"desirability of continuity in a child's upbringing and to
the child's ethnic, religious, cultural and linguistic
background."

All Member States of the EU have ratified the UN Convention
on the Rights of the Child and therefore should respect the
above mentioned principles. Therefore the Commission
considers that the moratorium on intercountry adoptions is
necessary as long as no legislation is in force that fully
complies with this convention, and as long as no
administrative capacity exists to implement this legislation.

Following Prime Minister Nastase's request for legal advice
on children's rights and adoption, the Commission set up an
Independent Panel of EU Member State experts on family law.
In its latest report, which I have forwarded to Prime
Minister Nastase, the Panel noted the fundamental change made
by Romania on the issue of intercountry adoption. The
proposed approach to pursue on the policy of intercountry
adoptions with a very limited exception was considered
essentially in line with the UN Convention on the Rights of
the Child.

Our primordial focus must be on getting the system of child
care in Romania right so that we get tot he usual situation
in the Member States of the EU where international adoptions
are the exception. Therefore, the EU has supported Romania
in its efforts to improve the quality of public care for
children. This meant that large residential establishments
were closed down and replaced with a selection of child
protection alternatives ranging from smaller homes and foster
care to day-care centres. Of course there remains work to be
done, but Romania surely has come a long way in resolving the
issue of children in public care.

I have been informed that recently a videoconference on this
issue was held between the Washington State Department and my
services, and that it was considered useful to have both
sides express their respective positions.

Yours sincerely,

/S/
Gunter Verheugen"

http://wikileaks.org/cable/2004/06/04BRU...

Yours faithfully,

Arun Dohle

-------------------------------------------------------------------

This is a request for access to information under Article 15 of the TFEU and, where applicable, Regulation 1049/2001 which has been sent via the AsktheEU.org website.

Please kindly use this email address for all replies to this request: [FOI #762 email]

If [DG ELARG request email] is the wrong address for information requests to Enlargement (ELARG), please tell the AsktheEU.org team on email [email address]

This message and all replies from Enlargement (ELARG) will be published on the AsktheEU.org website. For more information see our dedicated page for EU public officials at http://www.asktheeu.org/en/help/officers

-------------------------------------------------------------------

hide quoted sections

Neighbourhood and Enlargement Negotiations

Dear Mr Dohle,

We refer to your below request for access to documents dated and registered on 20 August under the above mentioned reference number.

We would like to thank you very much for the clarifications you provided.

Please note that your application is currently being handled. However, we would like to inform you that we will not be in a position to complete the handling of your application within the time limit of 15 working days, which expires on 10 September 2013. As large files have to be examined in order to retrieve the documents requested, an extended time is limit needed.

For this reason, we have to extend the time limit with 15 working days in accordance with Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 regarding public access to documents. The new time limit expires on 1 October 2013.

We apologise for this delay and for any inconvenience this may cause.

Yours faithfully,

The ELARG-ACCDOC Team.

-----Original Message-----
From: ELARG-ACCDOC
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2013 2:26 PM
To: 'Arun Dohle'
Cc: ELARG-ACCDOC
Subject: Your access to information request - Gestdem reference 2013/4455

Dear Sir,

Thank you for your request from 20 August 2013. We hereby acknowledge receipt of the below application for access to documents, which was registered on 20 August 2013 under the above mentioned reference number.

In accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents, your application will be handled within 15 working days. The time limit will expire on 10 September 2013. In case this time limit needs to be extended, you will be informed in due course.

Yours faithfully,

The ELARG-ACCDOC team.

-----Original Message-----
From: Arun Dohle [mailto:[FOI #762 email]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 11:03 AM
To: ELARG-ACCDOC
Subject: access to information request - Report Independent Panel of EU Member State Experts on Family Law

Dear Enlargement (ELARG),

Under the right of access to documents in the EU treaties, as developed in Regulation 1049/2001, I am requesting documents which contain the following information:

The report that was provided to the Romanian Government and the US Embassy in Bucharest, to which reference is made in the below US cable:

" E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/10/2014
TAGS: PREL CASC CVIS RO EUN USEU BRUSSELS
SUBJECT: VERHEUGEN RESPONSE TO DEPUTY SECRETARY ON ROMANIAN
ADOPTIONS

Classified By: Rick Holtzapple, PolOff, Reason 1.4 B/D

¶1. (U) The cabinet of Enlargement Commissioner Gunter
Verheugen has faxed us a letter from the Commissioner to
Deputy Secretary Armitage, replying to the Deputy Secretary's
letter of May 4 on the issue of Romanian adoptions. The full
text of the letter is in para 3 below, and a copy of the
original fax with signature has been faxed to EUR/ERA and
Embassy Bucharest.

¶2. (C) The letter confirms what we already know from the copy
of the report from the Commission to the GoR on the issue
that was provided to Embassy Bucharest. The Commission's
legal experts have told the Romanian government that the
"proposed approach to pursue on the policy of intercountry
adoptions with a very limited exception" is seen as
"essentially in line" with the EU's demands.

¶3. (U) Beginning of Text:

Dear Mr. Secretary of State,

Thank you for your letter of 4 May 2004 on the issue of
intercountry adoptions from Romania.

I would like to clarify that the European Commission is not
against intercountry adoption as such. However, the UN
Convention on the Rights of the Child foresees that
inter-country adoption may be considered only if the child
cannot be placed in a foster or an adoptive family or cannot
in any suitable manner be cared for in the child's country of
origin. This "last resort" provision is consonant with the
provision in the UN convention that refers to the
"desirability of continuity in a child's upbringing and to
the child's ethnic, religious, cultural and linguistic
background."

All Member States of the EU have ratified the UN Convention
on the Rights of the Child and therefore should respect the
above mentioned principles. Therefore the Commission
considers that the moratorium on intercountry adoptions is
necessary as long as no legislation is in force that fully
complies with this convention, and as long as no
administrative capacity exists to implement this legislation.

Following Prime Minister Nastase's request for legal advice
on children's rights and adoption, the Commission set up an
Independent Panel of EU Member State experts on family law.
In its latest report, which I have forwarded to Prime
Minister Nastase, the Panel noted the fundamental change made
by Romania on the issue of intercountry adoption. The
proposed approach to pursue on the policy of intercountry
adoptions with a very limited exception was considered
essentially in line with the UN Convention on the Rights of
the Child.

Our primordial focus must be on getting the system of child
care in Romania right so that we get tot he usual situation
in the Member States of the EU where international adoptions
are the exception. Therefore, the EU has supported Romania
in its efforts to improve the quality of public care for
children. This meant that large residential establishments
were closed down and replaced with a selection of child
protection alternatives ranging from smaller homes and foster
care to day-care centres. Of course there remains work to be
done, but Romania surely has come a long way in resolving the
issue of children in public care.

I have been informed that recently a videoconference on this
issue was held between the Washington State Department and my
services, and that it was considered useful to have both
sides express their respective positions.

Yours sincerely,

/S/
Gunter Verheugen"

http://wikileaks.org/cable/2004/06/04BRU...

Yours faithfully,

Arun Dohle

-------------------------------------------------------------------

This is a request for access to information under Article 15 of the TFEU and, where applicable, Regulation 1049/2001 which has been sent via the AsktheEU.org website.

Please kindly use this email address for all replies to this request: [FOI #762 email]

If [DG ELARG request email] is the wrong address for information requests to Enlargement (ELARG), please tell the AsktheEU.org team on email [email address]

This message and all replies from Enlargement (ELARG) will be published on the AsktheEU.org website. For more information see our dedicated page for EU public officials at http://www.asktheeu.org/en/help/officers

-------------------------------------------------------------------

hide quoted sections

Dear Enlargement (ELARG),

Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of Information reviews.

I am writing to request an internal review of Enlargement (ELARG)'s handling of my FOI request 'Report Independent Panel of EU Member State Experts on Family Law'.

I do not consider another 15 working days delay as justified.

According to Regulation 1049/2001
Article 7.3:
In exceptional cases, for example in the event of an application relating to a very long document or to a very large number of documents, the time-limit provided for in paragraph 1 may be extended by 15 working days, provided that the applicant is notified in advance and that detailed reasons are given.

I am of the opinion that my request does not fit the definition of "exceptional cases'. My request concerns a specific document that should be easy to retrace.

In the US cable a letter of Commissioner Verheugen is cited, in which he states:

"Following Prime Minister Nastase's request for legal advice on children's rights and adoption, the Commission set up an Independent Panel of EU Member State experts on family law.
In its latest report, which I have forwarded to Prime Minister Nastase, the Panel noted the fundamental change made by Romania on the issue of intercountry adoption."

The date of the US cable is 10 June 2004. So, one may assume that the letter from Commissioner Verheugen to US Deputy Secretary of State Armitage is of the same date, or a day or some days before.

So, my request concerns the latest report of the Independent Panel, before 10 June 2004.

I assume that a letter from a European Commissioner to the Romanian Prime Minister can be easily retraced in an electronic registry.

Considering the above, I kindly request a reply without further delay.

Yours faithfully,

Arun Dohle

Neighbourhood and Enlargement Negotiations

Dear Mr. Dohle,

We refer to your request for access to documents registered on 20 August under GESTDEM reference 2013/4455.

Your request should have been dealt with until today. However, due to difficulties in retrieving the requested document from the archives, we need more time than expected to process your request.

We will do our utmost to send you our reply until 07/10/2013. In any case, we are very sorry for the delays and the inconvenience this may cause.

Thank you very much for your understanding.

Yours sincerely,

The ELARG-ACCDOC Team.

-----Original Message-----
From: Arun Dohle [mailto:[FOI #762 email]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 9:18 PM
To: ELARG-ACCDOC
Subject: Internal review of access to information request - Report Independent Panel of EU Member State Experts on Family Law

Dear Enlargement (ELARG),

Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of Information reviews.

I am writing to request an internal review of Enlargement (ELARG)'s handling of my FOI request 'Report Independent Panel of EU Member State Experts on Family Law'.

I do not consider another 15 working days delay as justified.

According to Regulation 1049/2001
Article 7.3:
In exceptional cases, for example in the event of an application relating to a very long document or to a very large number of documents, the time-limit provided for in paragraph 1 may be extended by 15 working days, provided that the applicant is notified in advance and that detailed reasons are given.

I am of the opinion that my request does not fit the definition of "exceptional cases'. My request concerns a specific document that should be easy to retrace.

In the US cable a letter of Commissioner Verheugen is cited, in which he states:

"Following Prime Minister Nastase's request for legal advice on children's rights and adoption, the Commission set up an Independent Panel of EU Member State experts on family law.
In its latest report, which I have forwarded to Prime Minister Nastase, the Panel noted the fundamental change made by Romania on the issue of intercountry adoption."

The date of the US cable is 10 June 2004. So, one may assume that the letter from Commissioner Verheugen to US Deputy Secretary of State Armitage is of the same date, or a day or some days before.

So, my request concerns the latest report of the Independent Panel, before 10 June 2004.

I assume that a letter from a European Commissioner to the Romanian Prime Minister can be easily retraced in an electronic registry.

Considering the above, I kindly request a reply without further delay.

Yours faithfully,

Arun Dohle

-----Original Message-----

Dear Mr Dohle,

We refer to your below request for access to documents dated and registered on 20 August under the above mentioned reference number.

We would like to thank you very much for the clarifications you provided.

Please note that your application is currently being handled. However, we would like to inform you that we will not be in a position to complete the handling of your application within the time limit of 15 working days, which expires on 10 September 2013. As large files have to be examined in order to retrieve the documents requested, an extended time is limit needed.

For this reason, we have to extend the time limit with 15 working days in accordance with Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 regarding public access to documents. The new time limit expires on 1 October 2013.

We apologise for this delay and for any inconvenience this may cause.

Yours faithfully,

The ELARG-ACCDOC Team.

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[FOI #762 email]

This message and all replies from Enlargement (ELARG) will be published on the AsktheEU.org website. For more information see our dedicated page for EU public officials at http://www.asktheeu.org/en/help/officers

-------------------------------------------------------------------

hide quoted sections

Neighbourhood and Enlargement Negotiations

1 Attachment

Dear Mr. Dohle,

Please find attached the requested document.

Yours sincerely,

The ELARG-ACCDOC Team.

-----Original Message-----
From: ELARG-ACCDOC
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 5:35 PM
To: 'Arun Dohle'
Cc: ELARG-ACCDOC
Subject: RE: Internal review of access to information request - Report Independent Panel of EU Member State Experts on Family Law

Dear Mr. Dohle,

We refer to your request for access to documents registered on 20 August under GESTDEM reference 2013/4455.

Your request should have been dealt with until today. However, due to difficulties in retrieving the requested document from the archives, we need more time than expected to process your request.

We will do our utmost to send you our reply until 07/10/2013. In any case, we are very sorry for the delays and the inconvenience this may cause.

Thank you very much for your understanding.

Yours sincerely,

The ELARG-ACCDOC Team.

-----Original Message-----
From: Arun Dohle [mailto:[FOI #762 email]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 9:18 PM
To: ELARG-ACCDOC
Subject: Internal review of access to information request - Report Independent Panel of EU Member State Experts on Family Law

Dear Enlargement (ELARG),

Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of Information reviews.

I am writing to request an internal review of Enlargement (ELARG)'s handling of my FOI request 'Report Independent Panel of EU Member State Experts on Family Law'.

I do not consider another 15 working days delay as justified.

According to Regulation 1049/2001
Article 7.3:
In exceptional cases, for example in the event of an application relating to a very long document or to a very large number of documents, the time-limit provided for in paragraph 1 may be extended by 15 working days, provided that the applicant is notified in advance and that detailed reasons are given.

I am of the opinion that my request does not fit the definition of "exceptional cases'. My request concerns a specific document that should be easy to retrace.

In the US cable a letter of Commissioner Verheugen is cited, in which he states:

"Following Prime Minister Nastase's request for legal advice on children's rights and adoption, the Commission set up an Independent Panel of EU Member State experts on family law.
In its latest report, which I have forwarded to Prime Minister Nastase, the Panel noted the fundamental change made by Romania on the issue of intercountry adoption."

The date of the US cable is 10 June 2004. So, one may assume that the letter from Commissioner Verheugen to US Deputy Secretary of State Armitage is of the same date, or a day or some days before.

So, my request concerns the latest report of the Independent Panel, before 10 June 2004.

I assume that a letter from a European Commissioner to the Romanian Prime Minister can be easily retraced in an electronic registry.

Considering the above, I kindly request a reply without further delay.

Yours faithfully,

Arun Dohle

-----Original Message-----

Dear Mr Dohle,

We refer to your below request for access to documents dated and registered on 20 August under the above mentioned reference number.

We would like to thank you very much for the clarifications you provided.

Please note that your application is currently being handled. However, we would like to inform you that we will not be in a position to complete the handling of your application within the time limit of 15 working days, which expires on 10 September 2013. As large files have to be examined in order to retrieve the documents requested, an extended time is limit needed.

For this reason, we have to extend the time limit with 15 working days in accordance with Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 regarding public access to documents. The new time limit expires on 1 October 2013.

We apologise for this delay and for any inconvenience this may cause.

Yours faithfully,

The ELARG-ACCDOC Team.

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[FOI #762 email]

This message and all replies from Enlargement (ELARG) will be published on the AsktheEU.org website. For more information see our dedicated page for EU public officials at http://www.asktheeu.org/en/help/officers

-------------------------------------------------------------------

hide quoted sections

Dear Enlargement (ELARG),

Thank you for your reply by which you sent me the report of the Independent Panel of February 2004 along with the transmission letter of Commissioner Verheugen to Romanian Prime Minister Nastase.

However, this was not what I requested.

I requested access, as clarified by my mail of 10 September, to the report and transmission letter of the report of later date: transmission letter June 2004.

I expect to receive this document within maximum 3 days, as it concerns a simple request for 1 document and therefore does not fulfill the definition of any of the exceptions laid down in Regulation 1049/2001.

Yours faithfully,

Arun Dohle

Neighbourhood and Enlargement Negotiations

2 Attachments

Dear Mr. Dohle,

Thank you very much for your below reply. According to your message of 2 October (see attached), you were looking for "the latest report of the Independent Panel, before 10 June 2004".

We consider that the document which we sent to you yesterday corresponds to your request registered under GESTDEM reference 2013/4455.

In the document which we sent you yesterday, please note that only the transmission letter and not the report itself is dated. We take note that in your e-mail from yesterday you request a "transmission letter from June 2004".

We will launch another search in our archives and come back to you as soon as possible.

Yours faithfully,

The ELARG-ACDOC Team.

-----Original Message-----
From: Arun Dohle [mailto:[FOI #762 email]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2013 10:26 PM
To: ELARG-ACCDOC
Subject: Re: Your request for access to documents Gestdem 2013/4455

Dear Enlargement (ELARG),

Thank you for your reply by which you sent me the report of the Independent Panel of February 2004 along with the transmission letter of Commissioner Verheugen to Romanian Prime Minister Nastase.

However, this was not what I requested.

I requested access, as clarified by my mail of 10 September, to the report and transmission letter of the report of later date: transmission letter June 2004.

I expect to receive this document within maximum 3 days, as it concerns a simple request for 1 document and therefore does not fulfill the definition of any of the exceptions laid down in Regulation 1049/2001.

Yours faithfully,

Arun Dohle

-----Original Message-----

Dear Mr. Dohle,

Please find attached the requested document.

Yours sincerely,

The ELARG-ACCDOC Team.

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[FOI #762 email]

This message and all replies from Enlargement (ELARG) will be published on the AsktheEU.org website. For more information see our dedicated page for EU public officials at http://www.asktheeu.org/en/help/officers

-------------------------------------------------------------------

hide quoted sections

Neighbourhood and Enlargement Negotiations

1 Attachment

Dear Mr Dohle,

With reference to our latest correspondence attached below and as the result of another search in our archives, please find attached a further document corresponding to your request.

Yours faithfully,

The ELARG-ACCDOC Team.

-----Original Message-----
From: ELARG-ACCDOC
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2013 3:48 PM
To: 'Arun Dohle'
Cc: ELARG-ACCDOC
Subject: RE: Your request for access to documents Gestdem 2013/4455

Dear Mr. Dohle,

Thank you very much for your below reply. According to your message of 2 October (see attached), you were looking for "the latest report of the Independent Panel, before 10 June 2004".

We consider that the document which we sent to you yesterday corresponds to your request registered under GESTDEM reference 2013/4455.

In the document which we sent you yesterday, please note that only the transmission letter and not the report itself is dated. We take note that in your e-mail from yesterday you request a "transmission letter from June 2004".

We will launch another search in our archives and come back to you as soon as possible.

Yours faithfully,

The ELARG-ACDOC Team.

-----Original Message-----
From: Arun Dohle [mailto:[FOI #762 email]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2013 10:26 PM
To: ELARG-ACCDOC
Subject: Re: Your request for access to documents Gestdem 2013/4455

Dear Enlargement (ELARG),

Thank you for your reply by which you sent me the report of the Independent Panel of February 2004 along with the transmission letter of Commissioner Verheugen to Romanian Prime Minister Nastase.

However, this was not what I requested.

I requested access, as clarified by my mail of 10 September, to the report and transmission letter of the report of later date: transmission letter June 2004.

I expect to receive this document within maximum 3 days, as it concerns a simple request for 1 document and therefore does not fulfill the definition of any of the exceptions laid down in Regulation 1049/2001.

Yours faithfully,

Arun Dohle

-----Original Message-----

Dear Mr. Dohle,

Please find attached the requested document.

Yours sincerely,

The ELARG-ACCDOC Team.

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:

This message and all replies from Enlargement (ELARG) will be published on the AsktheEU.org website. For more information see our dedicated page for EU public officials at http://www.asktheeu.org/en/help/officers

-------------------------------------------------------------------

hide quoted sections