VOTING LIST
Draft opinion on
Artificial intelligence: questions of interpretation and application of international law in
so far as the EU is affected in the areas of civil and military uses and of state authority
outside the scope of criminal justice
(2020/2013(INI))
Rapporteur: Urmas Paet, Renew
(PA: PE650.702v01-00 - FdR 1204689)
(AM: PE652.560v01-00 - FdR 1206408)
Version 30.06.2020
Concerned Text
AM
Tabled by
Remarks
Pos.
Result
Rapp.
VOTE
PARAGRAPHS
EPP, S&D, RE,
BLOCK VOTE 1
VOTE
Greens/EFA,
+
COMPs 1-10
If adopted → AM 12
ECR
Paragraph 1,
Paragraph 2,
Paragraph 3,
Paragraph 4,
Paragraph 5,
Paragraph 6,
Paragraph 7,
AMs 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10,
Paragraph 8,
14, 15, 16, 17, 20, 21, 22, 23,
Paragraph 9,
24, 25, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 33,
Paragraph 10
Fall if BLOCK VOTE
35, 36, 37, 40, 41, 43, 44, 46,
+
1 adopted
47, 48, 53, 54, 57, 58, 59, 62,
66, 67
1

---

Falls if BLOCK
Paragraph 1
AM 1
Maurel
-
VOTE 1 adopted
Demirel, Daly,
Falls if BLOCK
Paragraph 2
AM 11
-
Wallace
VOTE 1 adopted
Demirel, Daly,
Falls if BLOCK
Paragraph 7
AM 39
-
Wallace
VOTE 1 adopted
Demirel, Daly,
Falls if BLOCK
Paragraph 9
AM 50
-
Wallace
VOTE 1 adopted
Demirel, Daly,
Falls if BLOCK
Paragraph 10
AM 60
-
Wallace
VOTE 1 adopted
Demirel, Daly,
Paragraph 2a (new)
12
VOTE
-
Wallace
SPLIT VOTE
Part I: “therefore
invites (. .) the
(. .) developers of
lethal autonomous
+
weapons systems
Paragraph 3
13
Maurel
(LAWS), to halt design,
prototyping and
production of such
systems“
Part I : “Russia and the
-
US, who (. .) main”
Olekas, López,
Sánchez Amor,
Paragraph 3 b
18
Ara-Kovács,
VOTE
+
(new)
Biedroń,
Schieder
Olekas, López,
Sánchez Amor,
Paragraph 3 c
19
Ara-Kovács,
VOTE
+
(new)
Biedroń,
Schieder
2

---

Demirel,
Paragraph 4
26
VOTE
-
Wallace, Pineda
Paragraph 5 a
32
Schieder
VOTE
-
(new)
SPLIT VOTE
Part I: “considers that,
in the hypothetical
event of these limits
being overstepped in a
theatre of operations,
+
those civilian or
military authorities
Paragraph 6
34
Maurel
which deployed AI
systems should be
held to account“
Part I : “including
before the
+
International Criminal
Court (ICC)“
Paragraph 6 a
38
Waszczykowski
VOTE
-
(new)
Paragraph 7
42
Maurel
VOTE
-
Paragraph 7 a
45
Waszczykowski
VOTE
-
(new)
Paragraph 8 a
49
Waszczykowski
VOTE
-
(new)
3

---

SPLIT VOTE
Part I: “reminds that
any given LAWS or
weapon with a high
degree of autonomy
could malfunction on
+
account of badly
written code or a
cyber-attack
perpetrated by an
enemy state or a non-
state actor;”
Part I : “cal s on
Member States to
clearly define and
Paragraph 9
51
Gregorová
communicate the
expected economic,
diplomatic and
military consequences
-
third actors engaging
in cyber-attacks
against European
weapons with a high
degree of autonomy
wil  face;”
Part I I: “believes that
the expected reaction
must be credible and
severe enough to
-
prevent such actions
caused by hostile
states and other
actors;”
52
Mariani, Riviere
VOTE
-
Paragraph 9 a
55
Gregorová
VOTE
+
(new)
Olekas, López,
Sánchez Amor,
Paragraph 9 a
56
Ara-Kovács,
VOTE
-
(new)
Biedroń,
Schieder
4

---

Paragraph 10
61
Maurel
VOTE
-
Paragraph 10 a
63
Tudorache
VOTE
+
(new)
Paragraph 10 a
64
Gregorová
VOTE
+
(new)
SPLIT VOTE
Part I: “Cal s on al  UN
Security Council
Members to classify
armed, ful y
autonomous drone
swarms as Weapons
-
of Mass Destruction
(WMD) because of
their degree of
potential harm and
innate deficiencies to
ful y differentiate
Paragraph 10 b
between military and
65
Gregorová
(new)
civilian targets”;
Part I : “believes that
effective non-
proliferation
enforcement of (ful y
autonomous drone
+
swarms) and any
future offensive AI-
enabled technologies
is paramount to global
security”;
Part I I: the term
-
“WMD”
FINAL VOTE ON OPINION AS
FOR
AGAINST
ABSTENTIONS
AMENDED
5

---