Ceci est une version HTML d'une pièce jointe de la demande d'accès à l'information 'DG Trade and international arbitral institutions: information on meetings and correspondence'.



Ref. Ares(2015)5993775 - 22/12/2015
Ref. Ares(2016)541363 - 01/02/2016
From:
 (TRADE) 
Sent: 21 April 2015 02:14 
To: 
SCHLEGELMILCH Rupert (TRADE); RUBINACCI Leopoldo (TRADE); 
PETRICCIONE  
Mauro Raffaele (TRADE); 
 (TRADE); GARCIA BERCERO Ignacio  
(TRADE); 
 (TRADE); 
 (TRADE);  
 (TRADE); REDONNET Denis (TRADE); 
 (TRADE);  
 (TRADE); 
 (TRADE);  
[Art. 4.1(b)]
 (TRADE); 
 (TRADE); 
(TRADE); 
 (TRADE); 
 (TRADE); 
 (TRADE); 
 (TRADE); 
(TRADE); 
 (TRADE-BANGKOK); 
 (EEAS- 
WASHINGTON); 
 (EEAS-WASHINGTON) 
Cc: 
 (TRADE) 
Subject: 
Meeting with ICSID 
[Out of scope]
>  
> I met today with Meg Kinner (SG ICSID and former senior Canadian Govt 
lawyer) and Aurelia Antonetti  
(senior lawyer at ICSID). We mostly discussed the technical issues 
related to the establishment of an  
appellate mechanism/permanent court but also touched upon other issues 
related to ICSID (EU  
situation, possible accession of Poland to ICSID (and of India and Viet 
Nam) and intra-EU issues). We also  
briefly touched upon the situation in Canada. 
>  
> In the issues relating to the establishment of an appellate mechanism 
the discussions identified a list of  
issues to be addressed which was very similar to the issues identified by 
F2 (e.g. scope of appeal,  
relationship to ICSID annulment, relationship to NY Convention, 
organisation of appellate  
mechanism/perm court, link to ICSID Convention enforcement, use of other 
rules, costs - will send more  
details of issues identified within F2 and B2). 
[Art. 4.1(a) 
third indent]

[Art. 4.1(a) third indent]
>  
[Art. 4.1(a) third indent]
>  
[Art. 4.1(a) third indent]
>  
[Art. 4.1(a) third indent]
>  
[Art. 4.1(a) third indent]
>  
[Art. 4.1(b)]
>  
> Sent from my iPad