Ref. Ares(2016)2851818 - 20/06/2016
From:
(CAB-BIENKOWSKA)
Sent:
20 June 2016 08:26
To:
CAB BIENKOWSKA ARCHIVES
Subject:
FW:
Attachments:
Tiering options-3.docx; Amendment 3.docx; Amendment 2 - Vers 2.docx;
Amendment 1 - Vers4.docx
Pour l'enregistrement, merci
A.
From:
[mailto:
@achema.com]
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2016 7:29 AM
To: HUSAK Tomasz (CAB-BIENKOWSKA)
Subject: FW:
Dear Mr. Husak,
Thank you and Commissioner for the opportunity to present threats for fertiliser industry under ETS
issue. It is important to state that all industry can not be treated the same. Therefore there has to
be a system that compensates for unavoidable emissions. Similarly when the correction factor is
applied it hits us 3 times more than other industry there then must be a system which spreads
the correction across industry at different levels.
The fair and consistent approach is to split CL list in to parts according to sensitivity – tiering. The draft
attached.
The unavoidible emission consists more than 50 % in ammonia production. The rate of
affordable annual emission reduction is small. We propose that could be used linear annual
reduction factor of 0,2% for free allowances allocation. The proposals for amendments
attached.
Best Regards
Technical Direktor