This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Freedom of Information request 'Access to WK documents linked to EU legislative procedures from February 1st to February 15th,2023'.


 
  
 
 
 

Council of the 
 
 

 European Union 
   
 
Brussels, 27 January 2023 
(OR. en) 
    5036/1/23 
REV 1 
Interinstitutional File: 
 
 
2022/0092(COD) 
LIMITE 
 
CONSOM 2 

MI 7 
COMPET 6 
 
 
ENER 1 
ENV 1 
SUSTDEV 1 
DIGIT 1 
CODEC 2 
 
NOTE 
From: 
Presidency 
To: 
Delegations 
Subject: 
Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF 
THE COUNCIL amending Directives 2005/29/EC and 2011/83/EU as 
regards empowering consumers for the green transition through better 
protection against unfair practices and better information 
- Presidency forth compromise proposal 
 
 
With a view to the meeting of the Working Party on Consumer Protection and Information on 3 
February 2023, delegations will find a Presidency compromise proposal in the Annex to this note.  
Changes compared to the Commission proposal are marked in bold underlined for new text and 
strikethrough for deleted text, changes compared to the previous compromise proposal (doc. 
5036/23) are also grey highlighted. 
 
 
5036/1/23 REV 1 
 
LM,sk 

 
COMPET.1 
LIMITE 
EN 
 

 
ANNEX 
Proposal for a 
DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL 
amending Directives 2005/29/EC and 2011/83/EU as regards empowering consumers for the 
green transition through better protection against unfair practices and better information 
(Text with EEA relevance) 
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, 
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 114 
thereof, 
Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission, 
After transmission of the draft legislative act to the national parliaments, 
Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee,1  
Acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, 
                                                 
1 
 
OJ C , , p. .  
 
5036/1/23 REV 1 
 
LM,sk 

ANNEX 
COMPET.1 
LIMITE 
EN 
 

 
Whereas: 
(1) 
In order to tackle unfair commercial practices which prevent consumers from making 
sustainable consumption choices, such as practices associated with the early obsolescence 
of goods, misleading environmental claims including claims about animal welfare 
(“greenwashing”), non-transparent and non-credible sustainability labels or sustainability 
information tools, specific rules should be introduced in Union consumer law. This would 
enable national competent bodies to address those practices effectively.  By eEnsuring that 
environmental claims are fair will enable, consumers will be able to choose products that 
are genuinely better for the environment than competing products. This will encourage 
competition towards more environmentally sustainable products, thus reducing negative 
impact on the environment. 
(2) 
Those new rules should be introduced both through amending Articles 6 and 7 of Directive 
2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council2 relating to those commercial 
practices which are to be considered misleading, and therefore prohibited, on the basis of a 
case-by-case assessment, and through amending Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC with the 
addition of specific misleading practices which are in all circumstances considered unfair, 
hence prohibited. It contiunes to be the case that a commercial practice which is not 
considered unfair according to the prohibitions in Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC is 
not per se fair, but can still be considered unfair based on the provisions of Articles 5 
to 9. 
                                                 
2 
Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 
concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market and 
amending Council Directive 84/450/EEC, Directives 97/7/EC, 98/27/EC and 2002/65/EC of 
the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the 
European Parliament and of the Council (‘Unfair Commercial Practices Directive’) (OJ L 
149, 11.6.2005, p. 22). 
 
5036/1/23 REV 1 
 
LM,sk 

ANNEX 
COMPET.1 
LIMITE 
EN 
 

 
(3) 
In order for consumers to take better-informed decisions and thus stimulate the 
demand for, and the supply of, more durable goods, the consumers should may not be 
misled about a product’s In order to deter traders from deceiving consumers as regards 
the environmental impact or social aspects, durability or reparability of their products, 
including through the overall presentation of the products,. Article 6(1) of Directive 
2005/29/EC should be therefore amended by adding the environmental impact or social 
aspects impact, durability and reparability of the product to the list of the main 
characteristics of the product in respect of which the trader’s practices can be considered 
misleading, following a case-by-case assessment. Information provided by traders on 
the social aspects of a product throughout its value chain may relate for example to 
the quality and fairness of working conditions of the involved workforce, such as 
adequate wages, social protection, work environment safety and social dialogue; to 
the respect for human rights, such as the absence of forced and child labour; and to 
equal treatment and opportunities for all, such as gender equality, inclusion and 
diversity. Another example is animal welfare. Information provided by traders on the 
social sustainability of products, such as working conditions, charity contributions or 
animal welfare, should not mislead consumers either. 
(4) 
Environmental claims, in particular climate-related claims, increasingly relate to future 
performance in the form of a transition to carbon or climate neutrality, or a similar 
objective, by a certain date. Through such claims, traders create the impression that 
consumers contribute to a low-carbon economy by purchasing their products. To ensure 
the fairness and credibility of such claims, Article 6(2) of Directive 2005/29/EC should be 
amended to prohibit such claims, following a case-by-case assessment, when they are not 
supported by clear, objective and verifiable commitments and targets given by the trader. 
Such claims should also be supported by an independent monitoring system to monitor the 
progress of the trader with regard to the commitments and targets. Consumers should be 
able to consult the findings of independent monitoring systems and thus be able to 
take note of the relevant proof indicating the progress of the trader producer. 
 
5036/1/23 REV 1 
 
LM,sk 

ANNEX 
COMPET.1 
LIMITE 
EN 
 

 
(5) 
Another potentially misleading commercial practice which should be added to the specific 
practices targeted by Article 6(2) of Directive 2005/29/EC is advertising characteristics of 
a product or product category as beneficial benefits for consumers that when those 
characteristics are actually a common practice feature in the relevant market regarding 
the relevant product or product category. Such advertising could affect transactional 
decision of the average consumers, especially if they are not aware that this is a 
common featureTherefore, it should be added to the specific practices targeted by 
Article 6(2) of Directive 2005/29/EC. The new specific ban would cover, for For 
example, if the absence of a chemical substance is a common practice in a specific product 
market, its promotion of the absence of a chemical substance as a distinctive feature of 
the product could constitute an unfair commercial practice if the absence of that chemical 
substance in a product or product category is a common practice. It is the case if the 
substance has never been associated with the particular product or product category 
For example, dishwashing liquid might be advertised as containing “no chemical 
substance X”. However, if it is a common feature that dishwashing liquid products have 
never contained CFCs do not contain the chemical substance X or do not contain it any 
more, the implication that the product has been improved through the removal of CFCs 
should that substance could be considered misleading.  A “free” claim may also be 
misleading if it implies to the average consumer that other products of the compared 
same product is category are unsafe, toxic or harmful when it is they are not. 
(6) 
Comparing products based on their durability, reparability, environmental or social 
aspects, including through the use of sustainability information tools, is an increasingly 
common marketing technique. In order to ensure that such comparisons do not mislead 
consumers, Article 7 of Directive 2005/29/EC should be amended to require that the 
consumer is provided with information about the method of the comparison, the products 
which are the object of comparison and the suppliers of those products, and the measures 
to keep information up to date. This should ensure that consumers make better informed 
transactional decisions when using such services. The comparison should be objective by, 
in particular, comparing products which serve the same function, using a common method 
and common assumptions, and comparing material and verifiable features of the products 
being compared. 
 
5036/1/23 REV 1 
 
LM,sk 

ANNEX 
COMPET.1 
LIMITE 
EN 
 

 
(7) 
Sustainability labels can set standards for different areas and thus address different 
aspects. This Directive should apply only to sustainability labels that refer 
predominantly to the environmental or social aspects of a product. Consequently, a 
label can refer to the environmental or social aspects in this way even though it to 
some extent also refers to other aspects. A sustainability label means any voluntary 
trust mark, quality mark or equivalent, which is awarded or from the consumers’ 
perspective seems to be awarded by a public or private entity to set apart and 
promote a product, process, or business about environmental or social aspects. The 
displaying of sustainability labels which are not based on a certification scheme or not 
established by public authorities entities should be prohibited by including such practices 
in the list in Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC. The certification scheme should fulfil 
minimum transparency and credibility conditions. The displaying of sustainability labels 
remains possible without a certification scheme where such labels are established by a 
public authority entity, or in case of additional forms of expression and presentation of 
food in accordance with Article 35 of Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011. This rule 
complements point 4 of Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC which prohibits claiming that a 
trader, the commercial practices of a trader, or a product has been approved, endorsed or 
authorised by a public or private body when it has not, or making such a claim without 
complying with the terms of the approval, endorsement or authorisation. 
(8) 
In cases where the displaying of a sustainability label involves a commercial 
communication that suggests or creates the impression that a product has a positive or no 
impact on the environment, or is less damaging to the environment than competing 
products, that sustainability label also should be considered as constituting an 
environmental claim. 
 
5036/1/23 REV 1 
 
LM,sk 

ANNEX 
COMPET.1 
LIMITE 
EN 
 

 
(9) 
Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC should also be amended to prohibit making generic 
environmental claims without recognised excellent environmental performance which is 
relevant to the claim. Examples of such generic environmental claims are ‘environmentally 
friendly’, ‘eco-friendly’, ‘eco’, ‘green’, ‘nature’s friend’, ‘ecological’, ‘environmentally 
correct’, ‘climate friendly’, ‘gentle on the environment’, ‘carbon friendly’, ‘carbon 
neutral’, ‘carbon positive’, ‘climate neutral’, ‘energy efficient’, ‘biodegradable’, ‘biobased’ 
or similar statements, as well as broader statements such as ‘conscious’, ’sustainable’ or 
‘responsible’ that suggest or create the impression of recognised excellent environmental 
performance. Such generic environmental claims should be prohibited whenever there is 
no excellent environmental performance demonstrated or whenever the specification of the 
claim is not provided in clear and prominent terms on the same medium, such as the same 
advertising spot, product’s packaging or online selling interface. For example, the claim 
‘biodegradable’, referring to a product, would be a generic claim, whilst claiming that ‘the 
packaging is biodegradable through home composting in one month’ would be a specific 
claim, which does not fall under this prohibition. 
 
5036/1/23 REV 1 
 
LM,sk 

ANNEX 
COMPET.1 
LIMITE 
EN 
 

 
(10) 
Excellent Recognised excellent environmental performance can be based on compliance 
with Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009 of the European Parliament and the Council on 
the voluntary participation by organisations in a Community eco-management and 
audit scheme (EMAS) or demonstrated by compliance with Regulation (EC) No 66/2010 
of the European Parliament and of the Council3, or officially recognised ecolabelling 
schemes in the Member States, or compliance with top environmental performance for a 
specific environmental aspect in accordance with other applicable Union laws, such as a 
class A in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2017/1369 of the European Parliament and of 
the Council4. The excellent environmental performance in question should be relevant to 
the claim. For example, a generic claim ‘energy efficient’ could be made based on 
excellent environmental performance in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2017/1369. By 
contrast, a generic claim ‘biodegradable’ could not be made based on excellent 
environmental performance in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 66/2010, insofar as 
there are no requirements for biodegradability in the specific EU Ecolabel criteria related 
to the product in question.   
(11) 
Another misleading commercial practice which should be prohibited in all circumstances 
and thus added to the list in Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC is making an environmental 
claim about the entire product when it actually concerns only a certain aspect of the 
product. This would be the case for example when a product is marketed as ‘made with 
recycled material’ giving the impression that the entire product is made of recycled 
material, when in fact it is only the packaging that is made of recycled material.  
                                                 
3 
Regulation (EC) No 66/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 
November 2009 on the EU Ecolabel (Text with EEA relevance) (OJ L 27, 30.1.2010, p. 1). 
4 
Regulation (EU) 2017/1369 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2017 
setting a framework for energy labelling and repealing Directive 2010/30/EU (OJ L 198, 
28.7.2017). 
 
5036/1/23 REV 1 
 
LM,sk 

ANNEX 
COMPET.1 
LIMITE 
EN 
 

 
(12) 
The Circular Economy Action Plan5 provides for the need to set the rules on environmental 
claims using Product and Organisation Environmental Footprint methods. Additional 
requirements on environmental claims will have to be set in specific Union legislation. 
Those new requirements will contribute to the Green Deal6 objective of enabling buyers to 
make more sustainable decisions and reduce the risk of greenwashing through reliable, 
comparable and verifiable information. 
(13) 
Presenting requirements imposed by law on all products within the relevant product 
category on the Union market, including imported products, as a distinctive feature of the 
trader’s offer, should also be prohibited in all circumstances and thus added to the list in 
Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC. This prohibition could apply, for example, when a trader 
is advertising that a given product does not include a specific chemical substance while 
that substance is already forbidden by law for all products within that product category in 
the Union. Conversely, the prohibition should not cover commercial practices promoting 
traders’ or products’ compliance with legal requirements that only apply to some products 
but not to other competing products of the same category on the Union market, such as 
products of non-EU origin. It could be the case that certain products on the market are 
required to comply with certain legal requirements while other products in the same 
product category do not. For example, fish products produced using EU-mandated 
sustainable fishing methods should be allowed to advertise compliance with EU legal 
requirements, since not all fish products offered on the EU market and of third 
country origin must comply with them.  
                                                 
5 
COM(2020)98 final, 11 March 2020. 
6 
COM(2019)640 final, 11 December 2019. 
 
5036/1/23 REV 1 
 
LM,sk 

ANNEX 
COMPET.1 
LIMITE 
EN 
 

 
(14) 
In order to improve the welfare of consumers, the amendments to Annex I to Directive 
2005/29/EC should also address several practices associated with early obsolescence, 
including planned early obsolescence practices, understood as a commercial policy 
involving deliberately planning or designing a product with a limited useful life so that it 
prematurely becomes obsolete or non-functional after a certain period of time or after a 
predetermined intensity of use. Purchasing products that are expected to last longer than 
they actually do causes consumer detriment. Furthermore, planned early obsolescence 
practices have an overall negative impact on the environment in the form of increased 
material waste and use of energy and materials. Therefore, addressing those information 
related to early obsolescence practices isare also likely to reduce the amount of waste, 
contributing to a more sustainable consumption.  
(14a) 
It should be prohibited under Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC to omit to inform the 
consumer, based on information provided by the producer, of the fact that such good 
contains a feature that was introduced to limit its durability. For example, such a 
feature could be software which stops or downgrades the functionality of the good 
after a particular period of time, or it could be a piece of hardware which is designed 
to cause the product failure after a particular period of time.  
(14b)  The use of features limiting the durability of goods should be distinguished from 
manufacturing practices using materials or processes of general low quality resulting 
in limited durability of the goods. Lack of conformity of a good resulting from the use 
of low quality materials or processes should continue to be governed by the rules on 
the conformity of goods set out in Directive (EU) 2019/7717. 
                                                 
7  
Directive (EU) 2019/771 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 
2019 on certain aspects concerning contracts for the sale of goods, amending 
Regulation (EU) 2017/2394 and Directive 2009/22/EC, and repealing Directive 
1999/44/EC (OJ L 136, 22.5.2019, p. 28). 

 
5036/1/23 REV 1 
 
LM,sk 
10 
ANNEX 
COMPET.1 
LIMITE 
EN 
 

 
(15) 
It should be prohibited under Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC to omit to inform the 
consumer that a software update, including a security update, may will negatively 
impacthinder the use functioning of goods with digital elements or certain features of 
those goods, even if the update improves the functioning of other features. For example, 
when inviting consumers to update the operating system on their smartphone, the trader 
will have to should inform the consumer if such an update may will negatively impact the 
functioning of any of the features of the smartphone, for example the battery, certain 
applications performances or a complete smartphone slowdown. This prohibition 
applies only to the trader that is providing the software update to the consumer, 
regardless whether it is the producer of the good, software provider or the seller of 
the good.  
 
5036/1/23 REV 1 
 
LM,sk 
11 
ANNEX 
COMPET.1 
LIMITE 
EN 
 

 
(16) 
It should also be prohibited to market a good omit to inform the consumer about the 
existence ofcontaining a feature of the good introduced to limit its durability, when the 
trader knows or can be reasonably expected to know about it. For example, such a 
feature could be software which stops or downgrades the functionality of the good after a 
particular period of time, or it could be a piece of hardware which is designed to fail after a 
particular period of time. The primary target group of this prohibition are the 
producers of the goods as they determine the durability of the goods. Producers of the 
goods fall within the scope of this Directive whenever they are engaged in business-to-
consumer commercial practices, such as advertising. In contrast mere retailers do not 
have influence on durability of the goods they sell and they may not know from the 
producer about the features of the good introduced to limit the durability. However, 
mere retailers can be held liable when they can be reasonably expected to know about 
such features, for example via a statement from a producer or a competent national 
authority. In such a situation, mere retailers should not market such goods. provide 
consumers with additional information at the point of sale, thus ensuring that 
consumers are made aware that the good concerned includes a feature to limit its 
durability. The prohibition of marketing such goods omitting to inform consumers of 
such features of the goods complements and does not affect the remedies available to 
consumers when they constitute a lack of conformity under Directive (EU) 2019/771 of the 
European Parliament and of the Council8. For such a commercial practice to be considered 
unfair, it should not be necessary to demonstrate that the purpose of the feature is to 
stimulate the replacement of the respective good. The use of features limiting the durability 
of the goods should be distinguished from manufacturing practices using materials or 
processes of general low quality resulting in limited durability of the goods. Lack of 
conformity of a good resulting from the use of low quality materials or processes should 
continue to be governed by the rules on the conformity of goods set out in Directive (EU) 
2019/771. 
 
                                                 
8 
Directive (EU) 2019/771 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2019 on 
certain aspects concerning contracts for the sale of goods, amending Regulation (EU) 
2017/2394 and Directive 2009/22/EC, and repealing Directive 1999/44/EC (OJ L 136, 
22.5.2019, p. 28).
 
 
5036/1/23 REV 1 
 
LM,sk 
12 
ANNEX 
COMPET.1 
LIMITE 
EN 
 

 
(17) 
Another practice which should be prohibited under Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC is the 
practice of falsely claiming that a good has a certain durability in terms of usage time or 
intensity under ordinary normal conditions of use when it does not and the trader 
knows or can be reasonably expected to know about it. That would be the case, for 
instance, when a trader informs consumers that a washing machine is expected to last a 
certain number of washing cycles if used in accordance with specific conditions 
provided in the instructions, while the actual use of the washing machine under the 
prescribed conditions shows this is not the case and the trader knows or can be 
reasonably expected to know about it.  
(18) 
Similarly, Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC should also be amended to prohibit presenting 
products as allowing repair when such repair is not possible, as well as omitting to inform 
consumers that it is not possible to repair goods in accordance with legal requirements.  
(19) 
The prohibition of those practices in relation to durability and reparability in Directive 
2005/29/EC would provide the consumer protection authorities of Member States with an 
additional enforcement tool for better protection of consumers’ interests in the cases where 
traders fail to comply with requirements on the durability and reparability of goods under 
Union product legislation. 
(20) 
Another practice associated with planned early obsolescence which should be prohibited 
and added to the list in Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC is inducing the consumer into 
replacing the consumables of a product earlier than would otherwise be necessary for 
technical reasons. Such practices mislead the consumer into believing that the goods will 
no longer function unless their consumables are replaced, thus leading them to purchase 
more consumables than necessary. For example, the practice of urging the consumer, via 
the settings of the printer, to replace the printer ink cartridges before they are actually 
empty in order to stimulate the purchase of additional ink cartridges would be prohibited.  
 
5036/1/23 REV 1 
 
LM,sk 
13 
ANNEX 
COMPET.1 
LIMITE 
EN 
 

 
(21) 
Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC should also be amended to prohibit omitting to inform 
the consumer that the good is designed to limit its functionality when using consumables, 
spare parts or accessories that are not provided by the original producer, when the trader 
knows or can be reasonably expected to know about such design limitations. For 
example, the marketing of printers that are designed to limit their functionality when using 
ink cartridges not provided by the original producer of the printer without disclosing this 
information to the consumer would be prohibited, when the trader knows or can be 
reasonably expected to know about such design limitations. This practice could mislead 
consumers into purchasing an alternative ink cartridge which cannot be used for that 
printer, thus leading to unnecessary repair costs, waste streams or additional costs for the 
consumer due to the obligation to use the original producer’s consumables which the 
consumer could not foresee at the time of purchase. Similarly, marketing smart devices 
designed to limit their functionality when using chargers or spare parts that are not 
provided by the original producer without disclosing this information to the consumer 
would be prohibited as well. The primary target group of this prohibition is the 
original producer of the good in question. Original producers of the goods fall within 
the scope of this Directive whenever they are engaged in business-to-consumer 
commercial practices, such as advertising. In contrast mere retailers do not have 
influence on such design limitations and may not know from the producer about 
them. However, mere retailers can be held liable when they can be reasonably 
expected to know about such design limitations, for example via a statement from the 
original producer or a competent national authority. In such a situation, mere 
retailers should provide consumers with additional information at the point of sale, 
thus ensuring that consumers are made aware that the good concerned has design 
limitations. 
 
5036/1/23 REV 1 
 
LM,sk 
14 
ANNEX 
COMPET.1 
LIMITE 
EN 
 

 
(22) 
In order for consumers to take better informed decisions and thus stimulate the demand for, 
and the supply of, more durable goods, specific information about a product’s durability 
and reparability should be provided for all types of goods as regards goods with digital 
elements, digital content and digital services, consumers should be informed about the 
period of time during which free software updates are available. Therefore, Directive 
2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council should be amended to provide 
consumers with pre-contractual information about durability, reparability and the 
availability of updates. Information should be provided to consumers in a clear and 
comprehensible manner and in line with the accessibility requirements of Directive 
2019/882. The obligation to provide this information to consumers complements and does 
not affect the rights of consumers provided in Directives (EU) 2019/770 and (EU) 
2019/771 of the European Parliament and of the Council.  
(23) 
A good indicator of a good’s durability is the producer’s commercial guarantee of 
durability within the meaning of Article 17 of Directive (EU) 2019/771 or another 
guarantor’s commercial guarantee of durability, under which the guarantor offers 
the same or more favourable conditions to the consumer as the producerSuchThe 
producer’s commercial guarantee of durability is not a new type of guarantee. 
Therefore, Directive 2011/83/EU should be amended to specifically require traders Such 
guarantee It is a commitment from a producer guarantor to the consumer on the 
durability of the good, more specifically it is a commitment that the good will 
maintain its required functions and performance through normal use. If the good will 
not keep its durability, the guarantor producer is directly liable to the consumer to 
offer free replacement or repair of the good. Consumers should benefit from clarity 
and better information on the durablity of goods via a harmonised graphic format set 
out in accordance with [Annex of this proposalDirective]. In addition, this will also 
address existing consumer confusion about the currently offered commercial 
guarantees information, which is often unclear, imprecise or incomplete. The 
producer’s commercial guarantee of durability should be beneficial to consumers and 
the environment since it promotes longer durability of goods. Traders selling goods 
should be specifically required to inform consumers about the existence of the producer’s 
commercial guarantee of durability for all types of goods, where such a guarantee has 
been issuedthe producer makes this information available. 
 
5036/1/23 REV 1 
 
LM,sk 
15 
ANNEX 
COMPET.1 
LIMITE 
EN 
 

 
(24) 
The problem of limited durability contrary to consumer expectations is most relevant for 
for energy-using goods, which are goods that function from an external energy source. 
Consumers are also most interested in receiving information about the expected durability 
of this category of goods. For these reasons, only for this category of goods, consumers 
should be made aware that the information about the existence of a producer’s commercial 
guarantee of durability of more than two years has not been provided by the producer. 
(25) 
Goods containing energy-using components, where those components are mere accessories 
and do not contribute to the main function of those goods, such as decorative lighting for 
clothing or footwear or electric light for a bicycle, should not be classified as energy-using 
goods. 
(26) 
In view of the established minimum duration of two years of the seller’s liability for lack 
of conformity in accordance with Directive (EU) 2019/771 and the fact that many product 
failures occur after two years, the trader’s obligation to inform consumers about the 
existence and duration of the producer’s commercial guarantee of durability should apply 
to guarantees that are of more than two years the duration of the legal guarantee of 
conformity
(27) 
In order to make it easier for consumers to take an informed transactional decision when 
comparing goods before concluding a contract, traders should inform consumers about the 
existence and its duration, or the absence of the producer’s commercial guarantee of 
durability for the entire good and not for specific components of the good. 
(28) 
The producer and the seller should remain free to offer other types of commercial 
guarantees and after-sales services of any duration. However, the information provided to 
the consumer about such other commercial guarantees or services should not confuse the 
consumer with regard to the existence and duration of the producer’s commercial 
guarantee of durability that covers the entire good., and has a longer duration of more than 
two years the minimum duration of the legal guarantee of conformity.  
 
5036/1/23 REV 1 
 
LM,sk 
16 
ANNEX 
COMPET.1 
LIMITE 
EN 
 

 
(29) 
To In order for consumers to take better-informed decisions and also to promote 
competition between producers as regards the durability of goods with digital elements, the 
traders selling those goods should inform consumers about the minimum period of time 
during which the provider producer commits to provide software updates for such goods. 
However, the trader should be obliged to provide this information only where the 
producer has made such information available. However, to avoid overloading 
consumers with information, such information should only be provided when this period is 
longer than the period of the producer’s commercial guarantee of durability, as that 
guarantee entails the provision of updates, including security updates, that are necessary to 
maintain the required functions and performance of goods with digital elements. 
Furthermore, information about the producer’s commitment to provide software updates is 
relevant only where the sales contract regarding goods with digital elements provides for a 
single act of supply of the digital content or digital service in respect of which Article 7(3), 
point (a), of Directive (EU) 2019/771 applies. In contrast, there should be no new 
obligation to provide that information where the sales contract provides for a continuous 
supply of the digital content or digital service over a period of time, since for those 
contracts Article 7(3), point (b), of Directive (EU) 2019/771 specifies, by reference to 
Article 10 (2) or (5), the period of time during which the seller is to ensure that the 
consumer is informed of and supplied with updates.  Likewise, traders offering digital 
content and digital services should also inform consumers about the minimum period 
during which the provider of the digital content or digital service, where the provider is 
different from the trader, commits to provide software updates, including security updates, 
necessary to keep the digital content and digital services in conformity. This will provide 
a simple and clear way for consumers to receive information about such minimum 
periods. It is without prejudice to the legal obligations in Directives (EU) 2019/770 
and (EU) 2019/771. The trader should be obliged to provide this information only 
where the provider has made such information available.  Information about the 
provider’s commitment to provide software updates is relevant only where the contract 
provides for a single act of supply or a series of individual acts of supply in respect of 
which Article 8(2), point (b), of Directive 2019/770 applies. In contrast, there should be no 
new obligation to provide that information where the contract provides for a continuous 
supply over a period of time, since for these contracts Article 8(2), point (a) of Directive 
 
5036/1/23 REV 1 
 
LM,sk 
17 
ANNEX 
COMPET.1 
LIMITE 
EN 
 

 
(EU) 2019/770 specifies the period of time during which the trader is to ensure that the 
consumer is informed of and supplied with updates. 
(31) 
Pursuant to Article 5(1), point (e), and Article 6(1), point (m), of Directive 2011/83/EU 
traders are obliged to provide the consumer before the consumer is bound by the 
contract with information on the existence and the conditions of after-sales services, 
including repair services, where such services are provided. In addition, to To allow 
consumers to make an informed transactional decision and choose goods that are easier to 
repair, traders should provide, before the conclusion of the contract, for all types of goods, 
where applicable, the reparability score of the good as provided by the producer in 
accordance with Union law or, where applicable national law adopted in accordance 
with Union law[first sentence moved from recital 32] 
 
5036/1/23 REV 1 
 
LM,sk 
18 
ANNEX 
COMPET.1 
LIMITE 
EN 
 

 
(32) 
Pursuant to Article 5(1), point (e), and Article 6(1), point (m), of Directive 2011/83/EU 
traders are obliged to provide the consumer before the consumer is bound by the contract 
with information on the existence and the conditions of after-sales services, including 
repair services, where such services are provided. In addition, in In order to ensure that 
consumers are well informed about the reparability of the goods they purchase, where a 
reparability score is not established in accordance with Union or national law, traders 
should provide, for all types of goods, other relevant repair information that is made 
available by the producer, such as information about the availability of spare parts, and a 
user and repair manual. The trader should not be required to actively search for such 
information from the producer, for example, on the product-specific websites. [last 
sentence moved from recital 33] 
(33) 
Traders should provide consumers with information about the existence and duration of the 
producer’s commercial guarantee of durability, the minimum period for updates and the 
repair information other than the reparability score, where the producer or provider of the 
digital content or digital service, when different from the trader, makes the relevant 
information available. In particular, as regards goods, the trader should convey to 
consumers the information that the producer has provided to the trader or has otherwise 
intended to make readily available to the consumer before the conclusion of the contract, 
by indicating it on the product itself, its packaging or tags and labels that the consumer 
would normally consult before concluding the contract. The trader should not be required 
to actively search for such information from the producer, for example, on the product-
specific websites. 
(34) 
Directives 2005/29/EC and 2011/83/EU should continue to work as a ‘safety net’ ensuring 
that a high level of consumer protection can be maintained in all sectors, by 
complementing sector and product-specific Union law that prevail in case of conflict. 
Similarly, the specific Union law providing for transparency and certification as 
included for example in Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009 (EMAS), Regulation (EC) 
66/2010 (EU Ecolabel), or Regulation (EC) 2017/1001 (trademark) should prevail in 
case of conflict. 
 
5036/1/23 REV 1 
 
LM,sk 
19 
ANNEX 
COMPET.1 
LIMITE 
EN 
 

 
(35) 
Since the objectives of this Directive, namely, enabling better informed transactional 
decisions by consumers to promote sustainable consumption, eliminating practices that 
cause damage to the sustainable economy and mislead consumers away from sustainable 
consumption choices, and ensuring a better and consistent application of the Union 
consumer legal framework, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States 
individually but can rather, by reason of the Union-wide character of the problem, be better 
achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle 
of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union. In accordance with 
the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Directive does not go beyond 
what is necessary to achieve those objectives. 
(36) 
In accordance with the Joint Political Declaration of 28 September 2011 of Member States 
and the Commission on explanatory documents9, Member States have undertaken to 
accompany, in justified cases, the notification of their transposition measures with one or 
more documents explaining the relationship between the components of a directive and the 
corresponding parts of national transposition instruments. With regard to this Directive, the 
legislator considers the transmission of such documents to be justified, 
                                                 
9 
OJ C 369, 17.12.2011, p. 14. 
 
5036/1/23 REV 1 
 
LM,sk 
20 
ANNEX 
COMPET.1 
LIMITE 
EN 
 

 
HAVE ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE: 
Article 1 
Amendments to Directive 2005/29/EC 
Directive 2005/29/EC is amended as follows: 
(1)  in Article 2, the following points (ca) and (o) to (y) are added: 
(ca) ‘goods’ means goods as defined in point (5) of Article 2 of Directive (EU) 
2019/771 of the European Parliament and of the Council; 
‘(o) ‘environmental claim’ means any message or representation, which is not 
mandatory under Union law or national law, including text, pictorial, graphic or 
symbolic representation, in any form, including labels, brand names, company names or 
product names, in the context of a commercial communication, which states or implies 
that a product or trader has a positive or no impact on the environment or is less 
damaging to the environment than other products or traders, respectively, or has 
improved their impact over time; 
(p) ‘explicit environmental claim’ means an environmental claim that is in textual form 
or contained in a sustainability label; 
(q) ‘generic environmental claim’ means any explicit environmental claim, made in 
anywritten form or orallyexcept, not contained in a sustainability label, where the 
specification of the claim is not provided in clear and prominent terms on the same 
medium; 
(r) ‘sustainability label’ means any voluntary trust mark, quality mark or equivalent, 
either public or private, that is awarded or gives an impression to be awarded with 
the aim aims to set apart and promote a product, a process or a business with reference 
predominantly to its environmental or social aspects or both. This does not cover any 
mandatory label required in accordance with Union or national law; 
 
5036/1/23 REV 1 
 
LM,sk 
21 
ANNEX 
COMPET.1 
LIMITE 
EN 
 

 
(s) ‘certification scheme’ means a third-party verification scheme that is open under 
publicly accessible, transparent, fair and non-discriminatory terms to all traders willing 
and able to comply with the scheme’s requirements, which certifies that a product, a 
process or a business complies with certain objectively verifiable and publicly 
accessible requirements, and for which the monitoring of compliance is objective, based 
on international, Union or national standards and procedures and carried out by a party 
independent from both the scheme owner and the trader; 
(t) ‘sustainability information tool’ means software, including a website, part of a 
website or an application, operated by or on behalf of a trader, which provides 
information to consumers about environmental or social aspects of products, or which 
compares products on those aspects;  
(u) ‘recognised excellent environmental performance’ means environmental 
performance with Regulation (EC) No. 1221/2009 or compliant with Regulation (EC) 
66/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council*, with national or regional EN 
ISO 14024 type I ecolabeling schemes officially recognised  in accordance with 
Article 11 of Regulation (EC) 66/2010ecolabelling schemes in the Member States, 
officially recognised in accordance with Article 11 of Regulation (EC) 66/2010, or top 
environmental performance in accordance with other applicable Union law; 
(v) ‘durability’ means durability as defined in Article 2, point (13), of Directive (EU) 
2019/771 of the European Parliament and of the Council**; 
(w) ‘software update’ means a free any update, including updates a security update, 
that is either necessary to keep goods with digital elements, digital content and digital 
services in conformity in accordance with Directives (EU) 2019/770 and (EU) 2019/771 
and other relevant Union and national law, or is provided against remuneration
(x) ‘consumable’ means any component of a good that is used up recurrently and needs 
to be replaced or replenished for the good to function as intended; 
 
5036/1/23 REV 1 
 
LM,sk 
22 
ANNEX 
COMPET.1 
LIMITE 
EN 
 

 
(y) ‘functionality’ means functionality as defined in point (9) of Article 2 of Directive 
(EU) 2019/771. 
________ 
* Regulation (EC) No 66/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 
November 2009 on the EU Ecolabel (OJ L 27, 30.1.2010, p. 1). 
** Directive (EU) 2019/771 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 
2019 on certain aspects concerning contracts for the sale of goods, amending Regulation 
(EU) 2017/2394 and Directive 2009/22/EC, and repealing Directive 1999/44/EC (OJ L 
136, 22.5.2019, p. 28).’;  
(2)  Article 6 is amended as follows: 
(a)  in paragraph 1, point (b) is replaced by the following: 
‘(b) the main characteristics of the product, such as its availability, benefits, risks, 
execution, composition, environmental impact, or social impact, accessories, 
durability, reparability, after-sale customer assistance and complaint handling, 
method and date of manufacture or provision, delivery, fitness for purpose, usage, 
quantity, specification, geographical or commercial origin or the results to be 
expected from its use, or the results and material features of tests or checks carried 
out on the product.’; 
(b)  in paragraph 2, the following points (d) and (e) are added: 
‘(d) making an environmental claim related to future environmental performance 
without clear, objective, publicly accessible and verifiable commitments and targets, 
and without an independent monitoring system; 
(e) advertising benefits for consumers that are a special characteristic of a product 
or product category as a unique advantage or benefit when such a 
characteristic is considered as a common practice characteristic feature in the 
relevant market respect of the particular product or product category
 
5036/1/23 REV 1 
 
LM,sk 
23 
ANNEX 
COMPET.1 
LIMITE 
EN 
 

 
(3)  in Article 7, the following paragraph (7) is added: 
‘7.  Where a trader provides a service which compares products and the consumer 
is provided with information on the durability, reparability, environmental or 
social aspects of the products or suppliers, including through a sustainability 
information tool, information about the method of comparison, the products which 
are the object of comparison and the suppliers of those products, as well as the 
measures in place to keep that information up to date, shall be regarded as material
in so far as the consumer is provided with information on the environmental 
aspects of the products or suppliers.’; 
(4)  Annex I is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Directive. 
 
Article 2 
Amendments to Directive 2011/83/EU 
Directive 2011/83/EU is amended as follows: 
(1)  Article 2 is amended as follows:  
(a)  the following point (3a) is inserted: 
‘(3a) ‘energy-using good’ means any good that depends on energy input (electricity, 
fossil fuels and renewable energy sources) to work as intended;’; 
 
5036/1/23 REV 1 
 
LM,sk 
24 
ANNEX 
COMPET.1 
LIMITE 
EN 
 

 
 
 
(b)  the following points (14a) to (14e) are inserted: 
‘(14a) ‘commercial guarantee of durability’ means athe producer’s commercial 
guarantee of durability referred to in Article 17 of Directive (EU) 2019/771, or 
another guarantor’s commercial guarantee of durability, under which the 
guarantor offers the same or more favourable conditions to the consumer 
than those provided in Article 17 of Directive (EU) 2019/771producer is 
directly liable to the consumer during the entire period of that the guarantee of 
durability for repair or replacement of the goods, under the conditions laid 
down in Article 14 of Directive (EU) 2019/771, whenever the goods do not 
maintain their durability
(14b) ‘durability’ means durability as defined in Article 2, point (13), of Directive (EU) 
2019/771; 
(14c) ‘producer’ means producer as defined in Article 2, point (4), of Directive (EU) 
2019/771; 
(14d) ‘reparability score’ means a score expressing the capacity of a good to be 
repaired, based on a method established in accordance with Union law; 
(14e) ‘software update’ means a free update, including a security update, that is 
necessary to keep goods with digital elements, digital content and digital services 
in conformity in accordance with Articles 7 and 8 of Directives Directive (EU) 
2019/770 and Articles 6 and 7 of Directive (EU) 2019/771;’; 
(2)  in Article 5, paragraph 1 is amended as follows: 
 
5036/1/23 REV 1 
 
LM,sk 
25 
ANNEX 
COMPET.1 
LIMITE 
EN 
 

 
(a)  the following points (ea), (ec) and to (ed) are inserted: 
‘(ea) where a commercial guarantee of durability on the entire good is issued, for 
all goods, where the producer makes it available, information that the goods 
benefit from such a commercial guarantee of durability and its duration in units of 
time, where that guarantee covers the entire good, and and has a longer duration 
of more than two years. This informationshall be at least as prominent as any 
other information about the existence and the conditions of after-sales services 
and commercial guarantees provided in accordance with point (e) than the 
minimum legal guarantee of conformity provided by Union law. The trader 
shall inform the consumer about the absence of such a commercial guarantee 
using a Union harmonised graphic format set out in accordance with [Annex 
of this proposalDirective] 
(eb) for energy-using goods, where the producer does not make available the 
information referred to in point (ea), information that the producer has not 
provided information on the existence of a commercial guarantee of durability of 
more than two years. This information shall be at least as prominent as any other 
information about the existence and the conditions of after-sales services and 
commercial guarantees provided in accordance with point (e); 
(ec)  for goods with digital elements, where the producer makes such information 
available to the trader, the minimum period in units of time during which the 
provider producer provides software updates, unless the contract provides for a 
continuous supply of the digital content or digital service over a period of time. 
Where information about the existence of a commercial guarantee of durability is 
provided in accordance with point (ea), the information on the updates shall be 
provided if those updates are supplied for a longer period than the commercial 
guarantee of durability; 
 
5036/1/23 REV 1 
 
LM,sk 
26 
ANNEX 
COMPET.1 
LIMITE 
EN 
 

 
(ed)  for digital content and digital services, where the provider of digital content 
and digital services makes such information available to the trader where 
their provider is different from the trader and makes such information available, 
the minimum period in units of time during which the provider provides software 
updates, unless the contract provides for a continuous supply of the digital content 
or digital service over a period of time;’ 
(b)  the following points (i) and (j) are added: 
‘(i)   where applicable, the reparability score for the goods; 
(j)   when point (i) is not applicable and the producer makes such information 
available to the trader, information made available by the producer about the 
availability of spare parts, including the procedure of ordering them, and about the 
availability of a user and repair manual.’; 
(3)   in Article 6, paragraph 1 is amended as follows:  
(a)  the following points (ma), (mc) and to (md) are inserted: 
‘(ma) for all types of goods, where a commercial guarantee of durability on the 
entire good is offered the producer makes it available, information that the good 
benefits from such a guarantee and its duration in units of time, the goods 
benefit from a commercial guarantee of durability and its duration in units of time, 
where that guarantee covers the entire good and has a longer duration of more 
than two years than the minimum legal guarantee of conformity provided for 
by Union law. The trader shall inform the consumer about the absence of 
such a commercial guarantee using a Union harmonised graphic format set 
out in accordance with [Annex ofto this proposal Directive]
 
5036/1/23 REV 1 
 
LM,sk 
27 
ANNEX 
COMPET.1 
LIMITE 
EN 
 

 
(mb) for energy-using goods, where the producer does not make available information 
referred to in point (ma), information that the producer has not provided 
information on the existence of a commercial guarantee of durability of more than 
two years. This information shall be at least as prominent as any other information 
about the existence and the conditions of after-sales services and commercial 
guarantees provided in accordance with point (m); 
(mc)  for goods with digital elements, where the producer makes such information 
available to the trader, the minimum period in units of time during which the 
producer provides software updates, unless the contract provides for a continuous 
supply of the digital content or digital service over a period of time. Where 
information about the existence of a commercial guarantee of durability is 
provided in accordance with point (ma), the information on the updates shall be 
provided if those updates are supplied for a longer period than the commercial 
guarantee of durability; 
(md) for digital content and digital services, where their provider is different from the 
trader and makes such information available the provider makes such 
information available to the trader, the minimum period in units of time during 
which the provider provides software updates, unless the contract provides for a 
continuous supply of the digital content or digital service over a period of time. 
Where the provider of digital content and digital services is different from 
the trader, the trader shall provide the information about the minimum 
period in units of time during which the provider provides software updates 
only if the provider makes such information available;’ 
(b)  the following points (u) and (v) are added: 
‘(u) where applicable, the reparability score for the goods; 
(v) when point (u) is not applicable, information made available by the producer about 
the availability of spare parts, including the procedure of ordering them, and about the 
availability of a user and repair manual.’; 
 
5036/1/23 REV 1 
 
LM,sk 
28 
ANNEX 
COMPET.1 
LIMITE 
EN 
 

 
(4)  in Article 8(2), the first subparagraph is replaced by the following: 
‘If a distance contract to be concluded by electronic means places the consumer under an obligation 
to pay, the trader shall make the consumer aware in a clear and prominent manner, and directly 
before the consumer places his order, of the information provided for in Article 6(1), points (a), (e), 
(ma), (mb), (o) and (p).’. 
Article 3 
Reporting by the Commission and review 
By [5 years from adoption], the Commission shall submit a report on the application of this 
Directive to the European Parliament and to the Council.  
That report shall be accompanied, where appropriate, by relevant legislative proposals. 
 
Article 4 
Transposition 
1. 
Member States shall adopt and publish by [18 24 months from adoption] at the latest, the 
laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive. 
They shall forthwith communicate to the Commission the text of those provisions. 
They shall apply those provisions from [24 30 months from adoption]. 
When Member States adopt those provisions, they shall contain a reference to this 
Directive or be accompanied by such a reference on the occasion of their official 
publication. Member States shall determine how such reference is to be made. 
 
5036/1/23 REV 1 
 
LM,sk 
29 
ANNEX 
COMPET.1 
LIMITE 
EN 
 

 
2. 
Member States shall communicate to the Commission the text of the main provisions in 
national law which they adopt in the field covered by this Directive. 
Article 5 
Entry into force 
This Directive shall enter into force on the twentieth day following its publication in the Official 
Journal of the European Union
Article 6 
Addressees 
This Directive is addressed to the Member States. 
Done at Brussels, 
For the European Parliament 
For the Council 
The President 
The President 
 
 
 
5036/1/23 REV 1 
 
LM,sk 
30 
ANNEX 
COMPET.1 
LIMITE 
EN 
 

 
Annex to the ANNEX 
Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC is amended as follows: 
(1)  the following point 2a is inserted: 
‘2a. Displaying a sustainability label which is either notneither based on a 
certification scheme or notnor established by public authorities entities.’; 
(2)  the following points 4a and 4b are inserted: 
‘4a. Making a generic environmental claim for which the trader is not able to 
demonstrate recognised excellent environmental performance relevant to the claim. 
4b. Making an environmental claim about the entire product when it actually 
concerns only a certain aspect of the product.’; 
(3)  the following point 10a is inserted: 
 ‘10a. Presenting requirements imposed by law on all products within the relevant 
product category on the Union market as a distinctive feature of the trader’s offer.’; 
(4)  the following points 23d to 23i are inserted: 
‘23d. Omitting to inform the consumer that a software update may will negatively 
impacthinder the functioning use of goods with digital elements or certain features 
of those goods or digital content or digital service even if the software update 
improves the functioning of other features. 
23e. Omitting to inform the consumer about the existence of a feature of a goodAny 
marketing of a good containing a feature introduced to limit its durability, when 
the trader knows or can be reasonably expected to know about it
 
5036/1/23 REV 1 
 
LM,sk 
31 
Annex to the ANNEX 
COMPET.1 
LIMITE 
EN 
 

 
23f. Falsely Cclaiming that a good has a certain durability in terms of usage time or 
intensity under ordinary normal conditions of use when it does not and the trader 
knows or can be reasonably expected to know about itas a result of a systematic 
underperformance of the relevant good
23g. Presenting goods as allowing repair when they do not or omitting to inform the 
consumer that goods do not allow repair in accordance with legal requirements.  
23h. Inducing the consumer into replacing or replenieshing the consumables of a 
good earlier than necessary for technical reasons is necessary. 
23i. Omitting to inform the consumer that a good is designed to limit its 
functionality when using consumables, spare parts or accessories that are not 
provided by the original producer, when the trader knows or can be reasonably 
expected to know about such design limitations.’. 
 
 
 
 
5036/1/23 REV 1 
 
LM,sk 
32 
Annex to the ANNEX 
COMPET.1 
LIMITE 
EN