This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Freedom of Information request 'Documents related to two meetings 25.05. & 03.07.'.


EUROPEAN COMMISSION 
DIRECTORATE-GENERAL 
TAXATION AND CUSTOMS UNION 
  Indirect Taxation and Tax Administration 
Value added tax 
Brussels, 17 March 2023 
 taxud.c.1(2023) 
 
 
MEETING REPORT 
1. Meeting 
 Conference on EU VAT in the digital age 
2. Subject 
 VAT in the digital age 
3. Date and Place  27-28 April 2023, Tegernsee (Germany) 
4. Participants 
 
 
5. Details 
 
The Conference gathered more than 100 participants from business, academics and tax 
administrations. It started with an update on EU VAT files in the context of the last tax 
action plan (by the Commission), including on the experience on the EU ecommerce 
package. 
Then the Commission made a detailed presentation on the 3 volets of VAT in the digital 
age, with each time a panel discussion and a questions / answers session. 
Main comments received : 
(i) SVR 
Most of the time was devoted to this topic. 
A first presentation was made by Germany (
, head of division for VAT, 
Ministry of finance), presenting the domestic plans on e-invoicing and digital reporting. 
The timeframe is still a bit uncertain but the development should be in phases between 
2025-2028. 
 also explained the German’s strong support to the Commission 
proposal and indicated they are in favour of an open system, with third party validation 
and no State clearance. 
A second presentation was made by Poland (
, Director for VAT, Ministry of 
finance), who stressed the Polish success in tackling the VAT gap (from 25 to 5 %). He 
also indicated that Poland is currently implementing an e-invoicing system based on 
clearance and on a domestic Polish standard. He was however not critical towards the 
 
Commission européenne/Europese Commissie, 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel, BELGIQUE/BELGIË - Tel. +32 22991111 
 

Commission proposal, only stressing the need to pay attention to avoiding too high 
adaptation costs. 
A third presentation (from 
, University of Copenhagen) was devoted to data 
protection (GDPR and Charter of fundamental rights) and to recent ECJ case Law calling 
for great care on digital reporting. And finally a business perspective (representative from 
Shell)  stressing the costs of fragmentation today and the need for harmonisation of 
domestic systems. 
The debate which followed was extremely supportive to the Commission proposal, with 
the following comments made : 
-  Need for an open system, not only involving State administrations, 
-  The need for flexibility of the timing of the report (the 2 days period), 
-  The need to fully respect data protection, 
-  The need for avoiding further derogations / fragmentation of the Internal Market, 
-  The need to avoid too high costs in MSs where investments have already been 
made. 
(ii) Platforms 
A first presentation was made by Poland (
) expressing some doubts about the 
Commission proposal, notably referring to the difficulty in controlling non EU platforms 
and the need for a tax representative, as well as on the need not to move the place of 
taxation to the MS where the building or transport service is / takes place. 
Another presentation was made by a representative of booking.com, strongly criticising 
the Commission proposal as it would generate a distortion of competition against 
platforms (e.g. because the absence of a right of deduction on the costs incurred by the 
hosts, including on platform fees). Finally, there was also a presentation from 
 
(University of Rotterdam), notably stressing the complexity of the deemed supply 
provision for c ross border passenger transport 
The debate which followed was much more balanced, with a number of participants 
supporting the aim of the Commission proposal. 
(iii) Single VAT registration  
This part was shorter, with presentations of a more technical nature from 
 
(University of Rotterdam) and from 
 (German Ministry of finance), who 
has been very supportive of the Commission proposal , indicating that it is in MS. 
The debate generated some discussion over the following topics : 
- absolute need to cover transfers in the OSS, 
- Need not to exclude capital goods, 
- Need in the longer term to include the right of deduction in the OSS, 
- Need to better secure the use of IOSS numbers. 
7.  Report by 
 
2/3 

 
Circulation 
Mr Thomas, 
, Ms Scoppio, 
, HOU & DHOU A2, B4, C1, 
C4, HOS C1 
3/3