‘No systemic breach’ reasoning and closure during active rectification (Arts 18-20 EUDPR) – PETI 0447/2025 & 0447/2025-bis
Dear European Parliament,
This application is made under Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 and Article 15 TFEU on public access to documents.
It does not concern access to my personal data under Regulation (EU) 2018/1725.
The purpose is to obtain transparency regarding the factual and legal reasoning underlying the Parliament’s and the European Commission’s assessment of Petitions 0447/2025 and 0447/2025-bis, both concerning systemic GDPR non-enforcement in Romania, and the subsequent procedural steps taken by PETI.
I respectfully request access to:
1) All internal correspondence, analyses, or briefing notes exchanged between the Committee on Petitions (PETI), the European Commission (DG JUST C-2/C-3/C-4), and the Parliament’s Legal Service that supported or discussed the statement contained in PETI_CM(2025) 777105 (5 September 2025):
“The petitioner mentions a potential systemic breach but does not provide any element or evidence pointing to its existence.”
2) Any factual or legal reasoning prepared by PETI, the Secretariat, or DG JUST to reach or endorse that conclusion, including internal memoranda, background papers, or e-mails assessing whether evidence demonstrated systemic GDPR failures.
3) Any correspondence or minutes addressing the following factual elements raised in the petitions:
– Expired mandates of the Romanian Data Protection Authority (ANSPDCP) since 2023/2024, affecting independence under Article 52 GDPR;
Example:
a) Ancuța Gianina Opre – mandate expired November 2023
Appointment: Senate Decision 48/26.06.2013
Renewal: Senate Decision 175/26.11.2018
b) Mirela Nistoroiu – mandate expired April 2024
Appointment: Senate Decision 19/17.04.2019
c) Law 102/2005, Art. 6(1) and 8(1): Maximum 2 mandates, continuity only until the appointment of a successor.
→ Opre: +1 year and 8 months past term
→ Nistoroiu: +1 year and 4 months past term
– Operation of over 20 Bar Councils (“Barouri de Avocați”) without designated DPOs, published privacy policies, or official domains (using @ gmail.com or @ yahoo.com addresses);
Examples: Argeș, Bacău, Bihor, Botoșani, Buzău, Caraș-Severin, Covasna, Dâmbovița, Giurgiu, Gorj, Harghita, Ialomița, Mehedinți, Mureș, Neamț, Olt, Satu Mare, Teleorman, Vâlcea, Vaslui, Vrancea – some domains registered to individuals (e.g., Argeș) and even routed through Germany.
– Non-functionality of the National Integrity Agency (ANI) and its impact on enforcement of Directive (EU) 2019/1937;
– Communications or interventions by the Romanian Prime Minister to the DPA President raising independence concerns.
4) All documents, notes, or e-mails relating to the decision to merge Petition 0447/2025 (“Systemic non-enforcement of GDPR: expired DPA mandates and independence risks”) with Petition 0447/2025-bis (“Alleged breach of the Whistleblower Directive”), including internal recommendations, Rule 232(8) references, and correspondence explaining the rationale for treating two distinct thematic petitions as a single case.
5) Documents, notes, or e-mails concerning the decision to mark Petition 0447/2025 as “closed” on the PETI portal after 6 November 2025 while a formal rectification and restriction-of-processing request under Articles 18 and 20 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 remained active.
6) Any internal analysis or legal reasoning used by PETI, the Secretariat, or the Parliament’s Data-Protection Officer to justify proceeding with closure despite an active Article 20 restriction, including risk assessments or compliance checks.
7) Any correspondence between PETI, the Data-Protection Officer, and the Access-to-Documents Unit referring to rectification, restriction of processing, or Article 19 notifications related to these petitions.
The request is limited to documents created or received between 1 July 2025 and 7 November 2025.
Please process this request under Regulation 1049/2001. Any necessary redactions of personal data may be applied under Article 4(1)(b) of that Regulation.
Kindly acknowledge receipt and provide the registration number of this application.
Yours faithfully,
Andrei-Daniel Posdarie
Public Interest Transparency Request
Our reference: 2025-0574
Dear Mr Posdarie,
The European Parliament hereby acknowledges receipt of your message, which
was registered on November 10, 2025.
All applications for public access to documents are treated in compliance
with Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of 30 May 2001 regarding public access
to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents.
In accordance with the above-mentioned Regulation, your application will
be handled within 15 working days upon registration of your request.
Your personal data will be processed in accordance with Regulation (EU)
2018/1725 of 23 October 2018 on the protection of natural persons with
regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions,
bodies, offices and agencies and on the free movement of such data. A
detailed privacy statement is available [1]here.
The European Parliament reserves the right to ask for additional
information regarding your identity in order to verify compliance with
Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 and the European Parliament’s implementing
measures.
Your attention is drawn to the fact that you have lodged your application
via the AsktheEU.org website, which is a private website not officially
related to the European Parliament. Therefore, the European Parliament
cannot be held accountable for any technical issues or problems linked to
the use of this system.
In addition, please note that any personal data that you provide by using
AsktheEU.org website may be disclosed to the general public and visible on
this private website. The European Parliament cannot be held responsible
for such disclosure. Should you need to communicate directly to Parliament
any personal data and would like to avoid public disclosure, you may do so
from your private email address by using the following functional mailbox
address: AccesDocs(at)europarl.europa.eu
Best regards,
TRANSPARENCY UNIT
European Parliament
Directorate-General for the Presidency
Directorate-General for Interinstitutional Affairs and Legislative
Coordination
[2][Dirección de correo del organismo Parlamento Europeo]
[3]www.europarl.europa.eu/RegistreWeb
References
Visible links
1. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegistreW...
2. mailto:[direcci%c3%b3n%20de%20correo%20del%20organismo%20parlamento%20europeo]
3. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegistreWeb
Our reference: 2025-0574
Dear Mr Posdarie,
Parliament has received your request for access to documents related to
your submissions to the Committee on Petitions. The PETI Secretariat is
currently treating a similar request regarding your file.
We would like to inform you that the processing by the PETI Secretariat is
the most adequate one in order to provide you with the most comprehensive
reply to your request, as it concerns your own file and it will be
conveyed directly to you and only to you.
Please note that any access to documents granted under Regulation
1049/2001 is subject to the possible application of the exceptions
provided for in the same Regulation and that, once disclosed in full or
partially, the documents will be accessible for the general public in the
Public Register of Documents.
Against this background, we would like to ask you if it this result would
be in your interest or if, on the contrary, the procedure ongoing with the
PETI Secretariat is convenient to your purpose.
We thank you very much for your reply at your earliest convenience.
Best regards,
TRANSPARENCY UNIT
European Parliament
Directorate-General for the Presidency
Directorate-General for Interinstitutional Affairs and Legislative
Coordination
[1][Dirección de correo del organismo Parlamento Europeo]
[2]www.europarl.europa.eu/RegistreWeb
References
Visible links
1. mailto:[direcci%c3%b3n%20de%20correo%20del%20organismo%20parlamento%20europeo]
2. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegistreWeb
Dear Mr Posdarie,
This is a gentle reminder of the below request for clarification.
In order to proceed with the handling of your application, as stated in
our message of 14 November, we would be grateful if you could let us know
whether you wish to proceed with our service handling your request under
Regulation 1049/2001, considering that as a result any document to which
access is granted will be published on Parliament’s Public Register, or
whether you agree for it to be handled directly by the PETI Secretariat.
We thank you in advance.
Kind regards,
TRANSPARENCY UNIT
European Parliament
Directorate-General for the Presidency
Directorate-General for Interinstitutional Affairs and Legislative
Coordination
[1][Dirección de correo del organismo Parlamento Europeo]
[2]www.europarl.europa.eu/RegistreWeb
From: AccesDocs <[Dirección de correo del organismo Parlamento Europeo]>
Sent: 14 November 2025 13:05
To: ask+[correo electrónico]
Subject: 2025-0574 MC EN - Treatment under Regulation 1049/2001 versus
treatment by the PETI Secretariat
Our reference: 2025-0574
Dear Mr Posdarie,
Parliament has received your request for access to documents related to
your submissions to the Committee on Petitions. The PETI Secretariat is
currently treating a similar request regarding your file.
We would like to inform you that the processing by the PETI Secretariat is
the most adequate one in order to provide you with the most comprehensive
reply to your request, as it concerns your own file and it will be
conveyed directly to you and only to you.
Please note that any access to documents granted under Regulation
1049/2001 is subject to the possible application of the exceptions
provided for in the same Regulation and that, once disclosed in full or
partially, the documents will be accessible for the general public in the
Public Register of Documents.
Against this background, we would like to ask you if it this result would
be in your interest or if, on the contrary, the procedure ongoing with the
PETI Secretariat is convenient to your purpose.
We thank you very much for your reply at your earliest convenience.
Best regards,
TRANSPARENCY UNIT
European Parliament
Directorate-General for the Presidency
Directorate-General for Interinstitutional Affairs and Legislative
Coordination
[3][Dirección de correo del organismo Parlamento Europeo]
[4]www.europarl.europa.eu/RegistreWeb
References
Visible links
1. mailto:[direcci%c3%b3n%20de%20correo%20del%20organismo%20parlamento%20europeo]
2. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegistreWeb
3. mailto:[direcci%c3%b3n%20de%20correo%20del%20organismo%20parlamento%20europeo]
4. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegistreWeb
Dear Transparency Unit,
Thank you for your follow-up.
For avoidance of doubt, I confirm that my application must continue to be processed under Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001. The nature and purpose of my request concern access to institutional documents, not personal data, and therefore cannot be handled under the separate procedure before the PETI Secretariat.
Accordingly, please proceed under Regulation 1049/2001 with the deadline running from the registration date of 10 November 2025.
Thank you for confirming this.
Kind regards,
Andrei-Daniel Posdarie
Ref: 2025-0574
Our reference: 2025-0574
Dear Mr Posdarie,
In reply to your request for access to documents held by the Parliament in
relation with Petition 0447/2025, we inform you that you can find the
relevant documents under the following reference to the Public Register of
Documents: [1]EP-PE_DV(2025)0574. Marginal personal data have been
removed.
On this basis, Parliament considers your application handled and the
procedure closed. Should you wish to submit any new requests for specific
Parliament documents, please do not hesitate to come back to us.
Best regards,
TRANSPARENCY UNIT
European Parliament
Directorate-General for the Presidency
Directorate-General for Interinstitutional Affairs and Legislative
Coordination
[2][Dirección de correo del organismo Parlamento Europeo]
[3]www.europarl.europa.eu/RegistreWeb
References
Visible links
1. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegistreW...
2. mailto:[direcci%c3%b3n%20de%20correo%20del%20organismo%20parlamento%20europeo]
3. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegistreWeb
Confirmatory Application under Article 7(2) – Ref. 2025-0574
Dear Transparency Unit,
Dear Secretary-General,
Please pass this on to the person who reviews confirmatory applications.
I am filing the following Confirmatory Application pursuant to Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 with regards to my access to documents request '‘No systemic breach’ reasoning and closure during active rectification (Arts 18-20 EUDPR) – PETI 0447/2025 & 0447/2025-bis'.
Your reply of 27 November 2025[1] does not address my request[2][3]. The three documents disclosed under reference EP-PE_DV(2025)0574 [4] are already public and relate solely to the Commission’s standard observations of 4–6 September 2025 [5][6][7].
My application explicitly requested internal analyses, correspondence and legal reasoning (Items 1–7 listed in my initial request [2][3]), including documents:
1) assessing whether evidence showed systemic GDPR non-enforcement in Romania,
2) concerning the Commission’s conclusion “the petitioner mentions ‘a potential systemic breach’ but does not provide any element or evidence pointing to the existence of a systemic breach” despite the extensive evidentiary documentation already submitted on file(i) Romanian DPA Expired Mandates, (ii) 20+ Lawyers Bar Councils infringing EU GDPR Regulation, (iii)Prime Minister of Romania interfering directly with forwards to DPA President, (iv) Romanian Senate confirming expired Mandates for the DPA President and obstructing access under FOI to Stenograme and discussions about DPA Vice-President and its expired mandate, (v) National Integrity Agency (ANI) infringing law 361/2022 which transpose Directive 1937/2019 - failure to respond/follow-up from July by date[2][3][5][6][7],
3) concerning the closure decision based on inaccurate data [5][6][7] while a rectification/restriction request was active[2][3] - dispatched on 31 October 2025, Acknowledged on 3 November 2025 and reconfirmed by your Unit on 5 November 2025 (while Article 20 and Article 18 restrictions under Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 were formally active and acknowledged by Parliament and your unit) , and
4) documenting use of Rule 232(8) to merge petitions (Petition 0447/2025 (“Alleged breach of the Whistleblower Directive”) with Petition 0447/2025-bis (“Systemic non-enforcement of GDPR: expired DPA mandates and independence risks”) [2][3]
None of these categories have been addressed.
No search description.
No partial access.
No Article 4 exemptions cited.
No assistance under Article 6(2).
This constitutes a constructive refusal of access.
I therefore request:
A) A fresh, full document identification and assessment for all items 1–7 within the scope [2][3] (1 July – 7 November 2025), including:
• PETI Secretariat
• DG JUST (C-2/C-3/C-4)
• Parliament Legal Service
• Parliament DPO
B) For any refusal or redaction, please specify:
• exact document(s) withheld,
• legal basis under Article 4 (with reasoning),
• date and author, and
• whether partial access can be granted.
C) A search log identifying all repositories searched and keywords applied.
The deadline for this confirmatory application runs from 28 November 2025, with the statutory response due by 19 December 2025.
A full history of my request and all correspondence is available on the Internet at this address [8]
Finally, with the European Parliament currently engaged in legislative work on GDPR enforcement reform (including the proposed “Omnibus Regulation GDPR” – COM(2025) 501 final), it is essential that the underlying records regarding systemic enforcement failures and independence impairments are accurate and complete. Any assessment or closure based on incomplete reasoning risks undermining Parliament’s future legislative position and credibility.
Thank you for confirming registration of this confirmatory application.
Kind regards,
Andrei-Daniel Posdarie
Public Interest Transparency Request
Ref.: 2025-0574
[1] https://www.asktheeu.org/request/no_syst...
[2] https://www.asktheeu.org/request/no_syst...
[3] https://www.asktheeu.org/request/no_syst...
[4] https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegistreW...
[5] https://www.europarl.europa.eu/petitions...
[6]https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/doc...
[7]https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/doc...
[8] https://www.asktheeu.org/request/no_syst...
Our reference: 2025-0574C
Dear Mr Posdarie,
The European Parliament hereby acknowledges receipt of your confirmatory
application, which was registered on November 28, 2025.
All applications for public access to documents are treated in compliance
with Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of 30 May 2001 regarding public access
to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents.
In accordance with the above-mentioned Regulation, your application will
be handled within 15 working days upon registration of your request.
Your personal data will be processed in accordance with Regulation (EU)
2018/1725 of 23 October 2018 on the protection of natural persons with
regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions,
bodies, offices and agencies and on the free movement of such data. A
detailed privacy statement is available [1]here.
The European Parliament reserves the right to ask for additional
information regarding your identity in order to verify compliance with
Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 and the European Parliament’s implementing
measures.
Your attention is drawn to the fact that you have lodged your application
via the AsktheEU.org website, which is a private website not officially
related to the European Parliament. Therefore, the European Parliament
cannot be held accountable for any technical issues or problems linked to
the use of this system.
In addition, please note that any personal data that you provide by using
AsktheEU.org website may be disclosed to the general public and visible on
this private website. The European Parliament cannot be held responsible
for such disclosure. Should you need to communicate directly to Parliament
any personal data and would like to avoid public disclosure, you may do so
from your private email address by using the following functional mailbox
address: AccesDocs(at)europarl.europa.eu
Best regards,
TRANSPARENCY UNIT
European Parliament
Directorate-General for the Presidency
Directorate-General for Interinstitutional Affairs and Legislative
Coordination
[2][Dirección de correo del organismo Parlamento Europeo]
[3]www.europarl.europa.eu/RegistreWeb
References
Visible links
1. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegistreW...
2. mailto:[direcci%c3%b3n%20de%20correo%20del%20organismo%20parlamento%20europeo]
3. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegistreWeb
Andrei-Daniel Posdarie left an annotation ()
Why the Commission Statement from the Conclusion of their Notice to Members from 05.09.2025 (PETI-CM-777105_EN), “the petitioner mentions ‘a potential systemic breach’ but does not provide any element or evidence pointing to the existence of a systemic breach” is personal data
Context
In the documents disclosed under reference PETI-CM-777105_EN and EP-PE_DV(2025)0574, the Commission stated that “the petitioner mentions a potential systemic breach but does not provide any element or evidence pointing to the existence of a systemic breach”. This is not merely abstract legal analysis. It is an evaluation of an identified petitioner (by name, petition number and submissions) that directly affects whether his petition is closed or escalated.
Under binding CJEU case-law and Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 (EUDPR), such targeted assessments constitute personal data, subject to rectification and restriction of processing, not only transparency rules.
Why this statement is personal data
The Court has clarified that information is personal data when, by its content, purpose or effect, it relates to an identifiable person:
• In Nowak (2017), examiner comments evaluating a named candidate were personal data because they influenced their situation and rights. (paras 33-44 & 45-63)
• In EDPS v SRB (2025), confirmed that subjective assessments held by EU institutions remain personal data where they influence a person’s administrative treatment — regardless of being opinions.
• YS (2014) is a narrow exception limited to purely abstract legal reasoning detached from an individual’s specific performance.
Here, the sentence:
Content — Evaluates the petitioner’s evidence and credibility
Purpose — Justifies non-escalation
Effect — Determines petition closure and dismissal of systemic GDPR concerns
This clearly “relates to” the petitioner within the meaning of Article 3(1) EUDPR.
Legal consequences under the EUDPR
If the statement is inaccurate:
• Article 18 EUDPR — Right to rectification
• Article 20 EUDPR — Right to restriction of processing while accuracy is contested
• Article 21 EUDPR — Notification obligation regarding rectification or erasure of personal data or restriction of processing
The statement is also stored in the petitioner’s dedicated case file and triggers administrative consequences. Therefore, it cannot lawfully be relied upon for petition-closure decisions until its accuracy is resolved. Recognising this sentence as personal data matters because it activates binding EU data-protection obligations, ensuring decisions affecting individuals are based on accurate and fair information.
References
[1] YS and Others v Minister voor Immigratie (Joined Cases C-141/12 & C-372/12) EU:C:2014:2081 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/...
[2] Peter Nowak v Data Protection Commissioner (Case C-434/16) EU:C:2017:994 especially Paras. 33-63 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/...
[3] EDPS v Single Resolution Board (Case C-413/23 P) EU:C:2025:645 https://curia.europa.eu/juris/documents....
[4] Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 — especially Articles 3(1), 18, 20 and 21 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2018/1...
Our reference: 2025-0574
Dear Mr Posdarie,
The time limit for responding to your confirmatory application for public
access to documents under Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001, as registered on
28 November 2025, expires today, 19 December 2025.
However, due to the complexity of your application, the several
consultations that we are conducting are taking more time than expected,
so that Parliament must exceptionally extend the time limit provided by
Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 by a further 15 working days
in accordance with Article 8(2) of that Regulation in order to reply to
your application.
Please note that the European Parliament's offices will be closed from
December 23, 2025, to January 2, 2026. Consequently, the deadlines for
responding to requests under Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 will be
temporarily suspended during that period and will resume on January 5,
2026
Please accept our apologies for any inconvenience. We thank you for your
understanding.
Best regards,
TRANSPARENCY UNIT
European Parliament
Directorate-General for the Presidency
Directorate-General for Interinstitutional Affairs and Legislative
Coordination
[1][Dirección de correo del organismo Parlamento Europeo]
[2]www.europarl.europa.eu/RegistreWeb
References
Visible links
1. mailto:[direcci%c3%b3n%20de%20correo%20del%20organismo%20parlamento%20europeo]
2. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegistreWeb
Our reference: 2025-0574C
Dear Mr Posdarie,
With a view to permitting the European Parliament to duly notify its
decision concerning your application, you are kindly invited to provide us
with your postal address.
Notification by registered letter with an acknowledgement of receipt is
required in order to ensure legal certainty as regards your receipt of
Parliament's decision, pursuant to the third subparagraph of Article
297(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (OJ C 326,
26.10.2012, p. 47).
We thank you for your understanding.
Best regards,
TRANSPARENCY UNIT
European Parliament
Directorate-General for the Presidency
Directorate-General for Interinstitutional Affairs and Legislative
Coordination
[1][Dirección de correo del organismo Parlamento Europeo]
[2]www.europarl.europa.eu/RegistreWeb
References
Visible links
1. mailto:[direcci%c3%b3n%20de%20correo%20del%20organismo%20parlamento%20europeo]
2. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegistreWeb
Andrei-Daniel Posdarie left an annotation ()
Annotation – 13 January 2026
I have today provided the European Parliament’s Transparency Unit with a postal address privately, solely for the purpose of formal notification under Article 297(2) TFEU in reference 2025-0574C.
This step is taken to enable lawful notification and does not alter the public-access nature of this request under Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001.
Following notification, any documents disclosed remain subject to publication in the European Parliament’s Public Register in accordance with Regulation 1049/2001.
Our reference: 2025-0574
Dear Mr Posdarie,
The time limit for responding to your application for public access to
documents under Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001, as registered on 28 November
2025, expires today, on 22 January 2026.
However, the decision concerning your application is being prepared, and
will be sent to you by post without delay once finalised.
Please accept our apologies for any inconvenience. We thank you for your
understanding.
Best regards,
TRANSPARENCY UNIT
European Parliament
Directorate-General for the Presidency
Directorate-General for Interinstitutional Affairs and Legislative
Coordination
[1][Dirección de correo del organismo Parlamento Europeo]
[2]www.europarl.europa.eu/RegistreWeb
References
Visible links
1. mailto:[direcci%c3%b3n%20de%20correo%20del%20organismo%20parlamento%20europeo]
2. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegistreWeb
Română | [1]English
[2]On Demand Delivery
EXPEDIEREA DVS. SE AFLĂ ÎN TRANZIT [3]logo
Bună ziua ANDREI-DANIEL POSDARIE,
Expedierea dvs. DHL Express, cu documentul de transport numărul
9642461780, de la EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, se află în tranzit și va
necesita semnătura dvs.
Data estimată de livrare este 04-Feb-2026 pana la sfarsitul zilei.
Pentru a vedea opțiunile dvs. de livrare, a efectua modificări sau a
urmări expedierea, faceți clic [4]aici.
INFORMAȚII LIVRARE
Nr. document de transport 9642461780
Adresa de livrare [address hidden]
[address hidden]
[address hidden]
[address hidden]
[address hidden]
BUCHAREST
Data de livrare estimată 04-Feb-2026
Ora livrării pana la sfarsitul zilei
Referință expeditor N/A
DHL Express - Excellence. Simply delivered.
[5]DHL Express | [6]Contact DHL | [7]Privacy Notice |
[8]Unsubscribe
2026 © DHL International GmbH. All rights reserved.
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
[9]Română | English
[10]On Demand Delivery
Your Shipment Is On Its Way [11]logo
Hello ANDREI-DANIEL POSDARIE,
Your DHL Express shipment with waybill number 9642461780 from EUROPEAN
PARLIAMENT is on its way. We will require a signature at the time of
delivery.
The current estimated delivery is Wed Feb 04 2026 by End of Day.
To view your delivery options, make a change or track your shipment,
click [12]here.
Delivery Information
Waybill No. 9642461780
Delivery Address [address hidden]
[address hidden]
[address hidden]
[address hidden]
[address hidden]
BUCHAREST
Estimated Delivery Date Wed Feb 04 2026
Delivery Time by End of Day
Shipper's Reference N/A
DHL Express - Excellence. Simply delivered.
[13]DHL Express | [14]Contact DHL | [15]Privacy Notice |
[16]Unsubscribe
2026 © DHL International GmbH. All rights reserved.
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
References
Visible links
1. file:///tmp/foiextract20260206-774997-yr5ygi#English
4. https://del.dhl.com/RO/U6V8hcA5pmd3?loca...
5. https://www.dhl.ro/ro/express.html
6. http://www.dhl.ro/ro/contact/contact_exp...
7. https://www.logistics.dhl/ro-en/home/foo...
8. https://unsubscribe.dhl.com/RO/unsubscri...
9. file:///tmp/foiextract20260206-774997-yr5ygi#Romanian
12. https://del.dhl.com/RO/U6V8hcA5pmd3?loca...
13. https://www.dhl.ro/en/express.html
14. http://www.dhl.ro/en/contact_center/cont...
15. https://www.logistics.dhl/ro-en/home/foo...
16. https://unsubscribe.dhl.com/RO/unsubscri...
Română | [1]English
[2]On Demand Delivery
LIVRAT! [3]logo
Bună ziua ANDREI-DANIEL POSDARIE,
Expedierea dvs. DHL Express cu documentul de transport numărul
9642461780, de la EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, a fost livrată conform
solicitării, la ora 15:56, pe data de 04-Feb-2026. Pentru mai multe
detalii, clic [4]aici.
Vă mulțumim că folosiți On Demand Delivery.
INFORMAȚII LIVRARE
Nr. document de transport 9642461780
Adresa de livrare [address hidden]
[address hidden]
Bucuresti
[address hidden]
[address hidden]
BUCHAREST
DHL Express - Excellence. Simply delivered.
[5]DHL Express | [6]Contact DHL | [7]Privacy Notice |
[8]Unsubscribe
2026 © DHL International GmbH. All rights reserved.
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
[9]Română | English
[10]On Demand Delivery
Delivered! [11]logo
Hello ANDREI-DANIEL POSDARIE,
Your DHL Express shipment with waybill number 9642461780 from EUROPEAN
PARLIAMENT has been delivered on Wed Feb 04 2026 at 15:56. For more
details, click [12]here.
Thank you for using On Demand Delivery.
Delivery Information
Waybill No. 9642461780
Delivery Address [address hidden]
[address hidden]
Bucuresti
[address hidden]
[address hidden]
BUCHAREST
DHL Express - Excellence. Simply delivered.
[13]DHL Express | [14]Contact DHL | [15]Privacy Notice |
[16]Unsubscribe
2026 © DHL International GmbH. All rights reserved.
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
References
Visible links
1. file:///tmp/foiextract20260206-774997-hoiegl#English
4. https://del.dhl.com/RO/0Vwihp1vxsW3?loca...
5. http://www.dhl.ro/ro.html
6. http://www.dhl.ro/ro/contact/contact_exp...
7. http://www.dhl.ro/ro/legal.html#privacy
8. https://unsubscribe.dhl.com/RO/unsubscri...
9. file:///tmp/foiextract20260206-774997-hoiegl#Romanian
12. https://del.dhl.com/RO/0Vwihp1vxsW3?loca...
13. http://www.dhl.ro/en.html
14. http://www.dhl.ro/en/contact_center/cont...
15. http://www.dhl.ro/en/legal.html#privacy
16. https://unsubscribe.dhl.com/RO/unsubscri...
Andrei-Daniel Posdarie left an annotation ()
European Parliament confirmatory decision published (Ref. 2025-0574C; 02.02.2026)
I am publishing the European Parliament’s confirmatory decision (Vice-President Roberts Zīle; Ref. 2025-0574C, dated 02.02.2026) for transparency (postal address redacted).
Folder: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1...
PDF: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1szAL0mf...
Key points in the decision:
Parliament states it has no competence to treat access requests for documents held by DG JUST / European Commission.
After a renewed search (including PETI Secretariat, Data Protection Office and Legal Service), Parliament identified no further documents within scope.
Parliament also states it is not obliged to provide a “search log” where such a log is not contained in an existing document.
This closes the Parliament-side confirmatory track and is relevant to the parallel Commission access-to-documents requests. (Direct Link: https://www.asktheeu.org/request/access_...)
Andrei-Daniel Posdarie left an annotation ()
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/doc...
Statement: “The petitioner mentions ‘a potential systemic breach’ but does not provide any element or evidence pointing to the existence of a systemic breach.”
This statement is factually incorrect.
DECISION No. 48 of June 26, 2013 on the appointment of the President of the National Supervisory Authority for Personal Data Processing, published in the OFFICIAL GAZETTE No. 383 of June 27, 2013 – https://legislatie.just.ro/Public/Detali...
DECISION No. 175 of November 26, 2018 on the appointment of the President of the National Supervisory Authority for Personal Data Processing, published in the OFFICIAL GAZETTE No. 1009 of November 28, 2018 – https://legislatie.just.ro/Public/Detali...
DECISION No. 19 of April 17, 2019 on the appointment of the Vice-President of the National Supervisory Authority for Personal Data Processing, published in the OFFICIAL GAZETTE No. 303 of April 18, 2019 – https://legislatie.just.ro/public/Detali...
Law 102/2005 – https://www.dataprotection.ro/servlet/Vi...
Law 102/2005, Article 6(1): Mandate = 5 years, maximum = 2 terms.
Law 102/2005, Article 8(1): Allows the President to stay in office only until a new President is appointed.
High independence risks under Article 52 GDPR.
Despite two mandates under Law 102/2005 Article 6(1), the President is still in the position two years after expiry based on Article 8(1) of the same law. Appointment procedure was discussed in the Senate on 27 November 2023, point 12, available at:
https://www.senat.ro/ProgramLucruZi.aspx...
According to the stenogram of the Senate plenary session on 27 November 2023, Mr. Sorin Mihai Cimpeanu announced the procedure for nominating the President of the National Supervisory Authority for Personal Data Processing (ANSPDCP), with submission of candidatures by parliamentary groups until 5 December 2023 and hearings of candidates and submission of the report by the Legal Committee until 11 December 2023:
https://www.senat.ro/PAGINI/Stenograme/S...
Yet, as of 28 October 2025, Ancuţa Gianina Opre remains in the position.
According to Senate Decision No. 19 of 17 April 2019 (Official Gazette No. 303/18.04.2019 – https://legislatie.just.ro/public/Detali...), the Vice-President of ANSPDCP was appointed in 2019 for a five-year mandate. The mandate therefore expired in 2024, yet the same individual remains in office.
The Senate failed under Law 544/2001 (Freedom of Information Act) to clarify when the renewal procedure was discussed or to provide supporting documentation, replying only that the mandate is considered extended under Article 8(1) of Law 102/2005 “until a new successor is appointed.”
These facts show an institutional breach of Article 52 GDPR on supervisory authority independence.
Bar Councils (“Barouri de Avocaţi”) using consumer email addresses, lacking Privacy Policies, Data Protection Officers, Terms and Conditions, and Consent Forms:
Baroul Argeș – baroularges.secretariat@gmail.com – https://www.baroularges.ro/
Baroul Bacău – sajbaroubacau@gmail.com – http://www.baroulbacau.ro/
Baroul Bihor – baroul.bihor@gmail.com – https://baroulbihor.ro/
Baroul Botoșani – baroulbotosani@gmail.com – http://www.baroulbotosani.ro/
Baroul Buzău – baroulbuzauunbr@gmail.com – http://www.baroulbuzau.ro/
Baroul Caraș-Severin – baroulcs@yahoo.com – http://www.baroulcarasseverin.ro/
Baroul Covasna – baroucov@yahoo.com – https://baroulcovasna.ro/
Baroul Dâmbovița – baroul_db@yahoo.com – http://www.barouldambovita.ro/
Baroul Giurgiu – baroulgr@yahoo.com – http://www.baroulgiurgiu.ro/
Baroul Gorj – baroulgj@yahoo.com – http://www.baroulgorj.ro/
Baroul Harghita – baroulharghita@yahoo.com – http://www.baroulharghita.ro/
Baroul Ialomița – baroulialomita@yahoo.com – http://www.baroulialomita.ro/
Baroul Mehedinți – barou_mh@yahoo.com – http://www.baroulmehedinti.ro/
Baroul Mureș – baroul_mures_av@yahoo.com – http://www.baroulmures.ro/
Baroul Neamț – baroulneamt@gmail.com – http://www.baroulneamt.ro/
Baroul Olt – baroulolt@yahoo.com – http://www.baroulolt.ro/
Baroul Satu Mare – baroulsm@gmail.com – http://www.baroulsm.ro/
Baroul Teleorman – baroulavtr@yahoo.com – http://www.baroulteleorman.ro/
Baroul Vâlcea – baroul.valcea.secretariat@gmail.com – http://www.baroulvalcea.ro/
Baroul Vaslui – barou.vaslui@gmail.com – http://www.baroulvaslui.ro/
Baroul Vrancea – barou.vrancea@gmail.com – http://www.baroulvrancea.ro/
All the above Bar Councils use free consumer email providers (Gmail or Yahoo) instead of professional domains, and none of their websites contain Privacy Policies, Terms and Conditions, or Data Protection Officer details.
This situation demonstrates a systemic failure in applying GDPR Articles 5, 24, 32, and 37–39, as well as non-compliance with national Law 190/2018 implementing GDPR.
Together with the expired mandates of the DPA leadership, these facts constitute verifiable evidence of systemic non-enforcement of the GDPR in Romania, directly contradicting the PETI_CM(2025)777105 EN assertion that the petitioner provided “no element or evidence” of such a systemic breach.