Document 7
- Ref. Ares(2021)4135420 -24/06/2021
From:
-(SANTE)
Sent:
jeudi 24 juin 2021 11:54
To:
Cc:
Subject:
FW: Unilever Future Foods commitments and position on FOP nutrition
labelling -
Attachments:
Unilever perspective on FOP nutrition labelling_May 2021.pdf; Market impact
of SG FOP - 6 Aug 2019.pdf; Brazilan consumer study supplementary data
June 2021.pdf; Manuscript Brazilian consumer study June 2021.pdf
Dear_,
Thank you for your message. We acknowledge good receipt of the different documents and articles
provided on front-of-pack nutrition labelling and we would like to thank you very much for your
contribution.
Kind regards,
--European Commission -Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety
Unit E.1 - Food information and composition
Tel.:
e-mail:
@ec.europa.eu
Web: https: //ec.europa.eu/food/food/label ling-and-nutrition en
From:
@unilever.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2021 4:34 PM
{SANT E) ---------
<
@ec.europa.eu>; -----
@ec.europa.eu�
{SANTE)
------
Cc:_____
@unilever.com>;
<
@unilever.com>
Subject: Unilever Future Foods commitments and position on FOP nutrition labelling -
Dear
On behalf of Unilever, I would like to thank you for your time and a productive meeting last
week.
As discussed, we appreciate the Commission is collecting data on the issue of FOPL, and we
would like to share some material for your consideration:
-
Unilever perspective on FOP label ing - May 2021
-
submitted for publication
-
-
Article Stephan Peters published in Dutch magazine Voeding translation (PDF) No
evidence for Nutri-Score's effectiveness in a supermarket (researchgate.net)
-
Blog series of Dr. Annet Roodenburg, this is link to the 9th blog and in there are links to
the previous 8 blogs: Voedselkeuzelogo #9: daarom dus (has.nl)
We hope you find it useful, and we will follow up with additional market studies in the upcoming
weeks.
In the meantime, please do not hesitate to contact us should you need further information.
Many thanks again and best regards,
, on behalf of the Unilever Team
