Request for access to documents – Case M.10815 (Deutsche Telekom / Orange / Telefónica / Vodafone – Joint Venture)
Dear Competition,
Under the right of access to documents in the EU treaties, as developed in Regulation 1049/2001, I am requesting documents which contain the following information:
pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001, Article 15 TFEU and Article 42 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, I hereby request full access to all documents related to case M.10815 – Deutsche Telekom / Orange / Telefónica / Vodafone – Joint Venture.
In particular, I request access to:
The complete Joint Venture Agreement (unredacted)
All annexes and amendments to the JV Agreement
The Shareholders Agreement
Governance and operational rules of the joint venture
The complete and unredacted version of the Commission’s decision
The Form CO notification submitted by the parties
All market analysis and internal assessments performed by DG COMP
All correspondence exchanged between DG COMP and the notifying parties concerning this joint venture
Given that this joint venture fundamentally influences the competitive landscape of the EU telecommunications market and affects millions of EU citizens, I consider that the public interest in transparency clearly outweighs any potential claims of commercial confidentiality, in line with the principles established by the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Yours faithfully,
Peter Ferenc
Rammelkam 2,
84036 Kumhausen,
Germany
Dear Sir or Madam,
We hereby acknowledge the receipt of your request for access to documents
sent on 10/12/2025 and registered on 10/12/2025 under the case number
2025/6534.
We will handle your request within 15 working days as of the date of
registration. The time-limit expires on 12/01/2026. We will let you know
if we need to extend this time limit for additional 15 working days.
To find more information on how we process your personal data, please see
[1]the privacy statement.
Yours faithfully,
Directorate-General for Competition - Access to Documents
European Commission
References
Visible links
1. https://ec.europa.eu/info/principles-and...
Dear Competition,
Thank you, I will wait for your response! I want an unblackened transparent contract!
Yours faithfully,
Peter Ferenc
Dear Peter Ferenc,
Subject: Your application for access to documents – Ref EASE
No 2025/6534
We refer to your message dated 10/12/2025 in which you make a request for
access to documents, registered on 10/12/2025 under the above-mentioned
reference number.
Please find attached a scan of the reply to your request for access to
documents, signed by the Director General.
You are kindly requested to reply to the present email acknowledging
receipt thereof.
Yours faithfully,
European Commission
Directorate-General for Competition
Unit C.5 Mergers
Directorate C – Markets and cases: Information Technology, Communication
and Media
Subject: Request for extension of the deadline to submit a confirmatory application – Ref. EASE 2025/6534
Dear Sir or Madam,
I hereby formally request an extension of the deadline to submit a confirmatory application in relation to my request for access to documents registered under reference EASE 2025/6534.
Grounds for the request
Due to objective technical reasons, I currently do not have reliable access to all necessary technical means and authentication credentials required to prepare and submit a legally substantiated confirmatory application.
The scope and complexity of the grounds for refusal require a thorough legal and factual analysis, in particular with regard to:
the application of exceptions to the right of access to documents,
the proportionality of the redactions applied,
and the assessment of compliance with EU law.
Submitting a confirmatory application without such analysis would be purely formal and would undermine the very purpose of the remedy provided for under EU law.
Legal basis
This request is based, inter alia, on:
Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (right to good administration),
Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (right to an effective remedy),
the principle of equality of arms and effective exercise of procedural rights,
and settled case-law according to which procedural deadlines must not be applied in a manner that renders the exercise of rights conferred by EU law practically impossible or excessively difficult.
Request
In light of the above, I request an extension of 30 days, calculated from the date of expiry of the original deadline for submitting the confirmatory application.
This request is submitted without any waiver of rights or admission of delay, and solely for the purpose of ensuring a proper, informed and legally effective exercise of my right to a remedy.
I kindly request written confirmation as to whether this extension has been granted.
Yours faithfully,
Peter Ferenc
Dear Mr Ferenc,
Thank you for your email of 19 January 2026, in which you enquire whether it is possible to extend the legal deadline of 15 working days as stipulated in Article 7(2) of Regulation 1049/2001 for filing a confirmatory application in response to a partial or total refusal as reply to a request for access to documents.
Please be informed that it is not possible to extend this deadline of 15 working days as the time limits set forth in Regulation 1049/2001 are not at the disposal of the parties and are determinative for the procedure of access to documents held by the institutions.
In this context, we would like to point out that the confirmatory stage serves as a full administrative review of the initial decision and must correct any omission from the initial decision even when not expressly contested in the confirmatory application by the applicant.
Given that the deadline for filing a confirmatory application in response to the initial negative reply of 7 January 2026 by the Directorate-General for Competition to your request for access to documents of 10 December 2025, registered under the reference EASE 2025/6534 has not expired yet, we would like to inform you that we are consequently not treating your enquiry as such a confirmatory application within the meaning of Regulation 1049/2001.
In this respect, we would once again like to draw your attention to section 5 of our initial negative reply of 7 January 2026, in which we explained the available means of redress, the applicable legal deadline and how and to which service of the European Commission to eventually submit such a confirmatory application, should you choose to do so.
Kind regards,
European Commission
Directorate-General for Competition
Unit C.5 Mergers
Directorate C – Markets and cases: Information Technology, Communication and Media
Dear [email address],
This confirmatory application was already submitted on 26 January 2026 via the AskTheEU platform. Due to a technical error, it was sent through the wrong interface and did not reach the institution.
The AskTheEU / Access Info Europe team has confirmed in writing that the message was submitted in time and can attest to this if necessary.
Please find below the link to the document confirming that my confirmatory application was submitted in due time via an alternative channel, due to a technical error on the platform.
https://1drv.ms/b/c/f6f0be5cf4541044/IQB...
Dear Sir or Madam,
I hereby submit a confirmatory application pursuant to Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001, requesting a full administrative review of the initial negative reply dated 7 January 2026 issued by the Directorate-General for Competition in response to my request for access to documents of 10 December 2025, registered under reference EASE 2025/6534.
I respectfully maintain that the initial decision unlawfully restricts my right of access to documents and fails to comply with the principles of transparency, proportionality and good administration laid down in Regulation 1049/2001 and Article 15 TFEU.
In particular:
1. Incorrect or overly broad application of exceptions
The initial reply relies on exceptions which have not been demonstrated to apply concretely and individually to the requested documents. The reasoning provided remains abstract and does not show how disclosure would specifically and actually undermine a protected interest, as required by settled case-law of the Court of Justice.
2. Failure to properly assess the overriding public interest
The documents requested concern matters of significant public interest, including the functioning of competition enforcement, compliance with EU law and the protection of fundamental rights. The initial decision does not carry out a genuine and reasoned assessment of whether an overriding public interest in disclosure exists.
3. Insufficient reasoning and lack of individual examination
The refusal does not demonstrate that each document was examined individually, nor does it explain why partial access could not be granted in accordance with Article 4(6) of Regulation 1049/2001.
4. Relevance of data protection and GDPR compliance
To the extent that data protection considerations were invoked, I note that Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 and Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR) do not justify a blanket refusal. Any personal data issues could and should be addressed through appropriate redaction rather than a denial of access.
As recalled in your correspondence of 20 January 2026, the confirmatory stage constitutes a full administrative review of the initial decision. I therefore invite the Commission to reassess the request in its entirety and to remedy any omissions or errors contained in the initial reply, including those not expressly contested above.
I respectfully request that the Commission grant access to the requested documents, in full or at least in part, in accordance with Regulation 1049/2001.
Yours faithfully,
Peter Ferenc
Dear Mr Ferenc,
We hereby acknowledge receipt of your email of 30 January 2026, in which you submit a request for confirmatory decision.
Please be informed that we have forwarded your email to the competent Secretariat-General of the European Commission.
Kind regards
COMP C-5
[1]RE: Internal review of access to documents request - Request for access
to documents – Case M.10815 (Deutsche Telekom / Orange / Telefónica /
Vodafone – Joint Venture) - Ares(2026)1214166 (Please use this link only
if you are an Ares user – Svp, utilisez ce lien exclusivement si vous êtes
un(e) utilisateur d’Ares)
Dear Applicant,
I refer to your email of 30 January 2026, by which you lodge a
confirmatory application in accordance with Article 7(2) of Regulation
1049/2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and
Commission documents[1] (hereafter Regulation 1049/2001).
I regret to inform you that your confirmatory application was lodged
outside the applicable deadline defined in Article 7(2) of Regulation
1049/2001. That Article provides that in the event of a total or partial
refusal, the applicant may, within 15 working days of receiving the
institution’s reply, make a confirmatory application asking the
institution to reconsider its position.
Consequently, the Commission is not in a position to handle your
application.
Yours sincerely,
Kind regards,
European Commission
Access to Documents Team
Dear SG ACCES DOCUMENTS,
🔴 RESPONSE TO ASKTHEEU (EN – READY TO POST)
Subject: Procedural clarification – Confirmatory application submitted on 26 January 2026 (Case M.10815)
Dear AskTheEU Team,
I must formally object to the position now being advanced in this matter and request that the factual and procedural record be accurately reflected.
1. Timely submission of the confirmatory application
My confirmatory application under Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 was **fully drafted and submitted on 26 January 2026**, i.e. **on the very last day of the statutory deadline**, via the AskTheEU platform.
This fact is **not disputed** and has been **expressly confirmed in writing by Access Info Europe**, including by documentary evidence (timestamped receipt of my message on 26 January 2026).
2. Technical non-forwarding cannot be attributed to the applicant
Any failure to forward the confirmatory application to the Commission **resulted exclusively from a technical and organisational issue on the side of the intermediary platform**.
Under settled case-law and general principles of EU law:
* an applicant **cannot be penalised** for technical malfunctions of an intermediary platform used in good faith;
* procedural rights conferred by Regulation 1049/2001 **cannot be extinguished by excessive formalism**.
3. Legitimate expectations and procedural acceptance
Crucially, the confirmatory application was:
* acknowledged,
* processed internally,
* and forwarded to the competent services of the Commission.
These acts constitute **formal procedural steps** that **implicitly recognised the procedural validity** of the confirmatory application.
Once such procedural acceptance has occurred, it is **legally impermissible** to retroactively negate it, as this would breach:
* the principle of good administration (Article 41 Charter),
* the protection of legitimate expectations,
* and the effectiveness of EU law.
4. Consequences
Any attempt to now recharacterise a duly submitted confirmatory application as “out of time” would amount to:
* arbitrary administrative conduct,
* manifestly disproportionate formalism,
* and a violation of Articles 41 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.
Such conduct would be **independently reviewable** by the European Ombudsman and, if necessary, by the EU Courts.
5. Request
I therefore request that:
* the record be corrected to reflect the timely submission on 26 January 2026,
* the confirmatory application be treated as validly lodged,
* and the Commission proceed with the **full administrative review required under Article 7(2) of Regulation 1049/2001.
This message is submitted **for the avoidance of doubt and without prejudice** to any further remedies available to me under EU law.
🔹 ADDITIONAL PROCEDURAL CLARIFICATION
For the avoidance of any doubt, I hereby confirm that the same confirmatory application was also transmitted directly to the European Commission on 7 February 2026 via official e-mail channels, namely:
[email address]
[email address]
as well as to the Cabinet of a Member of the Commission via [email address]
Accordingly, the content of the confirmatory application was unequivocally made available to the Commission through multiple official channels, further demonstrating my good faith, procedural cooperation, and genuine intention to exercise my rights under Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 in a proper and diligent manner.
Yours sincerely,
Peter Ferenc
Case No.: TFIA-2026-JV-002
Your message has been received by the Transparency Unit of the
Secretariat-General of the European Commission.
Requests for public access to documents are treated on the basis of
[1]Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to
European Parliament, Council and Commission documents.
The Secretariat-General will reply to your request within 15 working days
upon registration of your request and will duly inform you of the
registration of the request (or of any additional information to be
provided in view of its registration and/or treatment).
L’unité «Transparence» du secrétariat général de la Commission européenne
a bien reçu votre message.
Les demandes d’accès du public aux documents sont traitées sur la base du
[2]règlement (CE) n° 1049/2001 du 30 mai 2001 relatif à l’accès du public
aux documents du Parlement européen, du Conseil et de la Commission.
Le secrétariat général répondra à votre demande dans un délai de 15 jours
ouvrables à compter de la date d’enregistrement de votre demande, et vous
informera de cet enregistrement (ou vous indiquera toute information
supplémentaire à fournir en vue de l'enregistrement et/ou du traitement de
votre demande).
Ihre Nachricht ist beim Referat „Transparenz“ des Generalsekretariats der
Europäischen Kommission eingegangen.
Anträge auf Zugang zu Dokumenten werden auf der Grundlage der
[3]Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1049/2001 vom 30. Mai 2001 über den Zugang der
Öffentlichkeit zu Dokumenten des Europäischen Parlaments, des Rates und
der Kommission behandelt.
Das Generalsekretariat beantwortet Ihre Anfrage innerhalb von
15 Arbeitstagen nach deren Registrierung und wird Sie über die
Registrierung Ihres Antrags (oder die Notwendigkeit weiterer Informationen
im Hinblick auf dessen Registrierung und/oder Bearbeitung) unterrichten.
References
Visible links
1. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/...
2. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/...
3. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/...
Dear Applicant,
The European Commission cannot be held responsible for issues with third party websites. We invite you to use the official portal for requesting European Commission documents.
https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/docume...
Kind regards,
European Commission
Access to Documents Team
Dear [email address],
Applicant’s procedural position – acceptance and processing of the confirmatory application
Dear Sir or Madam,
I take note of your statement according to which the European Commission cannot be held responsible for the technical functioning of third-party websites such as the AskTheEU platform. I cannot agree with this assertion.
The AskTheEU platform has been long-standing accepted, used and effectively relied upon by the European Commission as a standard tool for exercising the public right of access to documents, through which the Commission:
regularly receives and handles access-to-documents requests,
communicates with applicants, and systematically processes submissions under Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001.
In these circumstances, AskTheEU cannot be regarded as a random or unauthorised third party, the use of which would be at the applicant’s own risk.
Independently of the above, I emphasise that this issue is not decisive for the assessment of the procedural admissibility of my submission.
The decisive fact is that the European Commission has received my confirmatory application, acknowledged its receipt and initiated its processing, as expressly confirmed by the message from the Transparency Unit of the Secretariat-General.
From the moment the Commission:
received the submission,
placed it within the framework of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001, and
informed me that it would be handled within the statutory time-limit following registration,
a formal procedural relationship arose between the applicant and the institution, for which full responsibility lies exclusively with the European Commission.
The question of the channel through which the submission was initially transmitted cannot retroactively affect its procedural admissibility, particularly where the Commission itself has confirmed receipt and the commencement of processing.
Under these circumstances, it is legally impermissible:
to retrospectively contest the timeliness or admissibility of the confirmatory application, or to transfer the consequences of technical or contractual arrangements between the Commission and a third party onto the applicant.
I therefore request that the Commission proceed with the full administrative review of the confirmatory application in accordance with Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001.
Yours faithfully,
Peter Ferenc
Your message has been received by the Transparency Unit of the
Secretariat-General of the European Commission.
Requests for public access to documents are treated on the basis of
[1]Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to
European Parliament, Council and Commission documents.
The Secretariat-General will reply to your request within 15 working days
upon registration of your request and will duly inform you of the
registration of the request (or of any additional information to be
provided in view of its registration and/or treatment).
L’unité «Transparence» du secrétariat général de la Commission européenne
a bien reçu votre message.
Les demandes d’accès du public aux documents sont traitées sur la base du
[2]règlement (CE) n° 1049/2001 du 30 mai 2001 relatif à l’accès du public
aux documents du Parlement européen, du Conseil et de la Commission.
Le secrétariat général répondra à votre demande dans un délai de 15 jours
ouvrables à compter de la date d’enregistrement de votre demande, et vous
informera de cet enregistrement (ou vous indiquera toute information
supplémentaire à fournir en vue de l'enregistrement et/ou du traitement de
votre demande).
Ihre Nachricht ist beim Referat „Transparenz“ des Generalsekretariats der
Europäischen Kommission eingegangen.
Anträge auf Zugang zu Dokumenten werden auf der Grundlage der
[3]Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1049/2001 vom 30. Mai 2001 über den Zugang der
Öffentlichkeit zu Dokumenten des Europäischen Parlaments, des Rates und
der Kommission behandelt.
Das Generalsekretariat beantwortet Ihre Anfrage innerhalb von
15 Arbeitstagen nach deren Registrierung und wird Sie über die
Registrierung Ihres Antrags (oder die Notwendigkeit weiterer Informationen
im Hinblick auf dessen Registrierung und/oder Bearbeitung) unterrichten.
References
Visible links
1. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/...
2. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/...
3. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/...
Hi,
Here's the attachment as a link for your review:
[1]https://acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc...
Add your comments and collaborate with others in real time. You don't need
to download Acrobat or sign up to access the file.
EN → DE → FR → ES → PL → IT → SK, Email Tracking No.: 2428.022
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
🇬🇧 ENGLISH (EN)
Subject: Submission of criminal complaint – damage to the financial
interests of the EU (Article 325 TFEU)
Dear Sir or Madam,
I hereby submit a criminal complaint by way of a link: [2]01_Criminal
report on LandesjustizkasseBamberg_EPPO_EN → DE → FR → ES → PL → IT →
SK_signed QES.pdf
The complaint concerns suspected criminal offences affecting the financial
interests of the European Union, within the meaning of Article 325 TFEU
and Directive (EU) 2017/1371 (PIF).
The criminal complaint was drawn up as a PDF document signed with a
Qualified Electronic Signature (QES), which, pursuant to Article 25(2) of
Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 (eIDAS), has the same legal effect as a
handwritten signature.
The submission is made in the Slovak language, which is an official
language of the European Union.
The Slovak language version is considered the original and legally binding
version.
The versions EN → DE → FR → ES → PL → IT are attached exclusively as
faithful mirror translations to facilitate processing.
I expressly point out that no provision of EU law requires a criminal
complaint to be submitted via a specific online form.
Pursuant to Article 24 of Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1939, the European
Public Prosecutor’s Office may receive information on offences affecting
the Union’s financial interests from any source, including natural
persons.
Any technical or procedural restriction which would:
• prevent the submission of the full content of the complaint,
• require its shortening or lead to the loss of factual allegations or
evidence,
• or make its acceptance conditional upon additional “prior assessment”,
constitutes, in my view, an unlawful barrier to access to justice and a
violation of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU and
Article 13 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
I therefore expect that the criminal complaint will be properly
registered, examined and handled on the basis of its substance, in
accordance with EU law, regardless of the technical means of its
transmission.
[3]Facebook
Yours faithfully,
Kumhausen, 09.02.2026
Peter Ferenc
Mobil: +49 157 317 3333 2
Rammelkam 2
84036 Kumhausen
Deutschland - Bayern
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
🇩🇪 DEUTSCH (DE)
Betreff: Einreichung einer Strafanzeige – Schädigung der finanziellen
Interessen der EU (Art. 325 AEUV)
Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,
hiermit übermittle ich Ihnen eine Strafanzeige in Form eines Links:
[4]01_Criminal report on LandesjustizkasseBamberg_EPPO_EN → DE → FR → ES →
PL → IT → SK_signed QES.pdf
Gegenstand ist eine Strafanzeige wegen des Verdachts von Straftaten zum
Nachteil der finanziellen Interessen der Europäischen Union im Sinne von
Artikel 325 AEUV und der Richtlinie (EU) 2017/1371 (PIF).
Die Strafanzeige wurde als PDF-Dokument erstellt und mit einer
qualifizierten elektronischen Signatur (QES) unterzeichnet, die gemäß
Artikel 25 Absatz 2 der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 910/2014 (eIDAS) die gleiche
Rechtswirkung wie eine handschriftliche Unterschrift hat.
Das Vorbringen erfolgt in slowakischer Sprache, welche eine Amtssprache
der Europäischen Union ist.
Die slowakische Sprachfassung gilt als Original und rechtlich verbindliche
Version.
Die Fassungen EN → DE → FR → ES → PL → IT sind ausschließlich als
wortgetreue Spiegelübersetzungen zur Erleichterung der Bearbeitung
beigefügt.
Ich weise ausdrücklich darauf hin, dass das Unionsrecht keine
Verpflichtung vorsieht, eine Strafanzeige über ein bestimmtes
Online-Formular einzureichen.
Nach Artikel 24 der Verordnung (EU) 2017/1939 kann die Europäische
Staatsanwaltschaft Informationen über Straftaten zum Nachteil der
finanziellen Interessen der Union aus jeder Quelle, auch von natürlichen
Personen, entgegennehmen.
Jegliche technische oder verfahrensrechtliche Beschränkung, die:
• die Übermittlung des vollständigen Inhalts verhindert,
• eine Verkürzung erzwingt oder zum Verlust von
Sachverhaltsdarstellungen oder Beweismitteln führt,
• oder die Annahme von einer zusätzlichen „Vorprüfung“ abhängig macht,
stellt eine unzulässige Zugangshürde zur Justiz und einen Verstoß gegen
Artikel 47 der Charta der Grundrechte der EU sowie Artikel 13 EMRK dar.
Ich erwarte daher, dass die Strafanzeige ordnungsgemäß registriert,
geprüft und inhaltlich bearbeitet wird, unabhängig von der technischen Art
der Übermittlung.
[5]Facebook
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Peter Ferenc
Kumhausen, 11.02.2026
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
🇫🇷 FRANÇAIS (FR)
Objet : Dépôt d’une plainte pénale – atteinte aux intérêts financiers de
l’UE (article 325 TFUE)
Madame, Monsieur,
Je vous transmets par la présente une plainte pénale sous forme de lien :
[6]01_Criminal report on LandesjustizkasseBamberg_EPPO_EN → DE → FR → ES →
PL → IT → SK_signed QES.pdf
La plainte concerne des soupçons d’infractions pénales portant atteinte
aux intérêts financiers de l’Union européenne, au sens de l’article 325
TFUE et de la directive (UE) 2017/1371 (PIF).
La plainte pénale a été établie sous la forme d’un document PDF signé par
une signature électronique qualifiée (QES), laquelle, conformément à
l’article 25, paragraphe 2, du règlement (UE) n° 910/2014 (eIDAS), produit
les mêmes effets juridiques qu’une signature manuscrite.
La soumission est effectuée en langue slovaque, qui est une langue
officielle de l’Union européenne.
La version linguistique slovaque est considérée comme la version originale
et juridiquement contraignante.
Les versions EN → DE → FR → ES → PL → IT sont jointes exclusivement en
tant que traductions miroir fidèles, afin de faciliter le traitement.
Je souligne expressément qu’aucune disposition du droit de l’Union
n’impose le dépôt d’une plainte pénale via un formulaire en ligne
spécifique.
Conformément à l’article 24 du règlement (UE) 2017/1939, le Parquet
européen peut recevoir des informations relatives à des infractions
portant atteinte aux intérêts financiers de l’Union de toute source, y
compris de personnes physiques.
Toute restriction technique ou procédurale qui:
• empêcherait la transmission de l’intégralité du contenu,
• imposerait un raccourcissement ou entraînerait la perte d’allégations
factuelles ou de preuves,
• ou subordonnerait l’acceptation à une « évaluation préalable »,
constituerait une entrave illégale à l’accès à la justice et une violation
de l’article 47 de la Charte des droits fondamentaux de l’UE et de
l’article 13 de la CEDH.
J’attends en conséquence que la plainte pénale soit dûment enregistrée,
examinée et traitée sur le fond, conformément au droit de l’Union,
indépendamment du mode technique de transmission.
[7]Facebook
Veuillez agréer l’expression de ma considération distinguée,
Peter Ferenc
Kumhausen, le 11.02.2026
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
🇪🇸 ESPAÑOL (ES)
Asunto: Presentación de denuncia penal – perjuicio a los intereses
financieros de la UE (artículo 325 TFUE)
Estimados señores,
Por la presente les remito una denuncia penal mediante un enlace:
[8]01_Criminal report on LandesjustizkasseBamberg_EPPO_EN → DE → FR → ES →
PL → IT → SK_signed QES.pdf
La denuncia se refiere a la sospecha de delitos que afectan a los
intereses financieros de la Unión Europea, en el sentido del artículo 325
TFUE y de la Directiva (UE) 2017/1371 (PIF).
La denuncia penal fue elaborada como documento PDF firmado con una firma
electrónica cualificada (QES), que, conforme al artículo 25, apartado 2,
del Reglamento (UE) n.º 910/2014 (eIDAS), tiene los mismos efectos
jurídicos que una firma manuscrita.
La presentación se realiza en lengua eslovaca, que es lengua oficial de la
Unión Europea.
La versión en lengua eslovaca se considera la versión original y
jurídicamente vinculante.
Las versiones EN → DE → FR → ES → PL → IT se adjuntan exclusivamente como
traducciones espejo fieles, para facilitar su tramitación.
Señalo expresamente que ninguna norma del Derecho de la Unión exige que
una denuncia penal se presente mediante un formulario en línea específico.
De conformidad con el artículo 24 del Reglamento (UE) 2017/1939, la
Fiscalía Europea puede recibir información sobre delitos que afecten a los
intereses financieros de la Unión de cualquier fuente, incluidas personas
físicas.
Cualquier restricción técnica o procedimental que:
• impida la presentación del contenido íntegro,
• obligue a su reducción o provoque la pérdida de hechos o pruebas,
• o condicione su aceptación a una “evaluación previa”,
constituiría una barrera ilegal al acceso a la justicia y una vulneración
del artículo 47 de la Carta de los Derechos Fundamentales de la UE y del
artículo 13 del CEDH.
Por ello, espero que la denuncia penal sea debidamente registrada,
examinada y tramitada en cuanto al fondo, con arreglo al Derecho de la
Unión, con independencia del medio técnico utilizado para su transmisión.
Atentamente,
Kumhausen, 11.02.2026
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
🇵🇱 POLSKI (PL)
Temat: Złożenie zawiadomienia o podejrzeniu popełnienia przestępstwa –
naruszenie interesów finansowych UE (art. 325 TFUE)
Szanowni Państwo,
niniejszym przekazuję zawiadomienie o podejrzeniu popełnienia przestępstwa
w formie linku: [9]01_Criminal report on LandesjustizkasseBamberg_EPPO_EN
→ DE → FR → ES → PL → IT → SK_signed QES.pdf
Zawiadomienie dotyczy podejrzenia przestępstw naruszających interesy
finansowe Unii Europejskiej, w rozumieniu art. 325 TFUE oraz dyrektywy
(UE) 2017/1371 (PIF).
Zawiadomienie zostało sporządzone jako dokument PDF podpisany
kwalifikowanym podpisem elektronicznym (QES), który zgodnie z art. 25 ust.
2 rozporządzenia (UE) nr 910/2014 (eIDAS) wywołuje takie same skutki
prawne jak podpis własnoręczny.
Złożenie następuje w języku słowackim, który jest językiem urzędowym Unii
Europejskiej.
Słowacka wersja językowa jest uznawana za wersję oryginalną i prawnie
wiążącą.
Wersje EN → DE → FR → ES → PL → IT są dołączone wyłącznie jako wierne
tłumaczenia lustrzane, w celu ułatwienia rozpatrzenia.
Wyraźnie wskazuję, że prawo Unii Europejskiej nie nakłada obowiązku
składania zawiadomienia wyłącznie za pośrednictwem określonego formularza
online.
Zgodnie z art. 24 rozporządzenia (UE) 2017/1939, Prokuratura Europejska
może przyjmować informacje o przestępstwach naruszających interesy
finansowe Unii z każdego źródła, w tym od osób fizycznych.
Jakiekolwiek ograniczenia techniczne lub proceduralne, które:
• uniemożliwiałyby przekazanie pełnej treści,
• wymuszałyby jej skrócenie lub prowadziły do utraty twierdzeń
faktycznych lub dowodów,
• lub uzależniałyby przyjęcie od dodatkowej „wstępnej oceny”,
stanowiłyby nielegalną barierę dostępu do wymiaru sprawiedliwości oraz
naruszenie art. 47 Karty praw podstawowych UE i art. 13 EKPC.
Oczekuję zatem, że zawiadomienie zostanie prawidłowo zarejestrowane,
rozpatrzone i ocenione merytorycznie, zgodnie z prawem Unii Europejskiej,
niezależnie od technicznego sposobu jego przekazania.
[10]Facebook
Z poważaniem,
Peter Ferenc
Kumhausen, 11.02.2026
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
🇮🇹 ITALIANO (IT)
Oggetto: Presentazione di denuncia penale – danno agli interessi
finanziari dell’UE (articolo 325 TFUE)
Egregi Signori,
con la presente trasmetto una denuncia penale mediante link:
[11]01_Criminal report on LandesjustizkasseBamberg_EPPO_EN → DE → FR → ES
→ PL → IT → SK_signed QES.pdf
La denuncia riguarda il sospetto di reati che ledono gli interessi
finanziari dell’Unione europea, ai sensi dell’articolo 325 TFUE e della
direttiva (UE) 2017/1371 (PIF).
La denuncia è stata redatta come documento PDF firmato con firma
elettronica qualificata (QES), che, ai sensi dell’articolo 25, paragrafo
2, del regolamento (UE) n. 910/2014 (eIDAS), produce gli stessi effetti
giuridici di una firma autografa.
La presentazione avviene in lingua slovacca, che è lingua ufficiale
dell’Unione europea.
La versione in lingua slovacca è considerata la versione originale e
giuridicamente vincolante.
Le versioni EN → DE → FR → ES → PL → IT sono allegate esclusivamente come
traduzioni speculari fedeli, al fine di agevolare l’esame.
Preciso espressamente che nessuna norma del diritto dell’Unione impone la
presentazione di una denuncia penale tramite uno specifico modulo online.
Ai sensi dell’articolo 24 del regolamento (UE) 2017/1939, la Procura
europea può ricevere informazioni su reati che ledono gli interessi
finanziari dell’Unione da qualsiasi fonte, comprese le persone fisiche.
Qualsiasi restrizione tecnica o procedurale che:
• impedisse la trasmissione del contenuto integrale,
• imponesse una riduzione o comportasse la perdita di fatti o prove,
• o subordinasse l’accettazione a una “valutazione preventiva”,
costituirebbe una barriera illegittima all’accesso alla giustizia e una
violazione dell’articolo 47 della Carta dei diritti fondamentali dell’UE e
dell’articolo 13 della CEDU.
Mi aspetto pertanto che la denuncia penale sia regolarmente registrata,
esaminata e trattata nel merito, in conformità al diritto dell’Unione
europea, indipendentemente dal mezzo tecnico utilizzato per la sua
trasmissione.
[12]Facebook
Distinti saluti,
Peter Ferenc
Kumhausen, 11.02.2026
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
Slovenská verzia:
Vec: Podanie trestného oznámenia – poškodzovanie finančných záujmov EÚ
(čl. 325 ZFEÚ)
Vážené dámy, vážení páni,
trestné oznámenie Vám predkladám formou odkazu: [13]01_Criminal report on
LandesjustizkasseBamberg_EPPO_EN → DE → FR → ES → PL → IT → SK_signed
QES.pdf
Ide o trestné oznámenie týkajúce sa podozrenia zo spáchania trestných
činov poškodzujúcich finančné záujmy Európskej únie v zmysle článku 325
ZFEÚ a smernice (EÚ) 2017/1371 (PIF).
Uvedené trestné oznámenie bolo vyhotovené ako PDF dokument podpísaný
kvalifikovaným elektronickým podpisom (QES), ktorý má podľa článku 25 ods.
2 nariadenia (EÚ) č. 910/2014 (eIDAS) rovnaké právne účinky ako
vlastnoručný podpis.
Podanie je uskutočnené v slovenskom jazyku, ktorý je úradným jazykom
Európskej únie.
Slovenská jazyková verzia sa považuje za originálnu a právne záväznú
verziu.
Verzie EN → DE → FR → ES → PL → IT sú priložené výlučne ako verné
zrkadlové preklady na uľahčenie spracovania.
Výslovne upozorňujem, že žiadny právny (zákonný) predpis Európskej únie
neustanovuje povinnosť podať trestné oznámenie prostredníctvom konkrétneho
online formulára.
Podľa článku 24 nariadenia Rady (EÚ) 2017/1939 môže Európska prokuratúra
prijímať informácie o trestných činoch poškodzujúcich finančné záujmy Únie
z akéhokoľvek zdroja, vrátane fyzických osôb.
Akékoľvek technické alebo procesné obmedzenie, ktoré by:
• znemožnilo pripojenie úplného znenia podania,
• viedlo k jeho skracovaniu alebo strate skutkových tvrdení a dôkazov,
• alebo podmieňovalo jeho prijatie dodatočným „posudzovaním potreby“,
považujem za nezákonnú bariéru prístupu k spravodlivosti a za porušenie
článku 47 Charty základných práv EÚ a článku 13 Európskeho dohovoru o
ľudských právach.
Z tohto dôvodu očakávam, že predmetné trestné oznámenie bude riadne
zaevidované, preskúmané a vybavené podľa jeho obsahu, v súlade s právom
Európskej únie, bez ohľadu na technický spôsob jeho doručenia.
[14]Facebook
S úctou,
Peter Ferenc
Kumhausen, 11.02.2026
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
References
Visible links
1. https://acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc...
2. https://acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc...
3. https://www.facebook.com/StopTelekomKart...
4. https://acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc...
5. https://www.facebook.com/StopTelekomKart...
6. https://acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc...
7. https://www.facebook.com/StopTelekomKart...
8. https://acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc...
9. https://acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc...
10. https://www.facebook.com/StopTelekomKart...
11. https://acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc...
12. https://www.facebook.com/StopTelekomKart...
13. https://acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc...
14. https://www.facebook.com/StopTelekomKart...