Dear Environment,

Under the right of access to documents in the EU treaties, as developed in Regulation 1049/2001, I am requesting documents which contain the following information:

I would like to request the following specific information regarding EU funds allocated to the Czech Republic and any related actions due to incorrect implementation of Directive 2011/92/EU (EIA Directive):

1. EU funds available and used for trans-European infrastructure projects:
Please provide information for each of the following programming periods (2007–2013, 2014–2020, 2021–2027):

a) What was the total amount of EU funding available to the Czech Republic for the TEN-T trans-European infrastructure (including transport and other infrastructure)?
b) How much funding was actually used by the Czech Republic in each period?
c) What specific projects or types of infrastructure were funded, and by which mechanisms?

2. Infringement-related actions due to incorrect transposition of the EIA Directive:
For each of the above periods, please specify:

a) Were any formal decisions made by the European Commission to suspend or restrict funding due to incorrect implementation of the EIA Directive or other environmental laws?
b) If yes, please provide the relevant decisions or documentation, and detail the legal provisions of EU law that the Czech Republic was found to have violated.

3. Other measures taken due to incorrect implementation (if no formal decisions):

If no formal decisions to suspend funding were issued, were other measures taken by EU institutions due to the incorrect transposition of the EIA Directive or other environmental legislation?

If so, please provide details and documents related to these actions and identify the EU institutions involved.

Thank you very much for your assistance.
Sincerely,

Beata Sabolova

Dear Environment,

I am writing in follow-up to my request for information.

To this date I received answer only to Point 1** of my request.

**Points 2 and 3 (and their sub-questions)** concerning infringement-related actions and any other measures taken due to the incorrect transposition of Directive 2011/92/EU (EIA Directive) remain unanswered.

Regulation 1049/2001 sets a statutory deadline of 15 working days (Article 7 §1), extendable once by the same period in duly justified cases (Article 7 §3). More than **three months** have now elapsed since my original request, and I have not been informed of any valid reason for the extended delay.

I therefore kindly—but firmly—request that you:

1. **Provide the complete set of documents and information requested under Points 2 and 3** without further delay, or
2. **Indicate the precise date by which the outstanding material will be delivered**, together with an explanation for the protracted delay, should additional time genuinely be necessary.

If no reply is received within **15 working days of receipt of this email**, I will consider lodging a confirmatory application under Article 7 §2 of Regulation 1049/2001 and, if needed, seek further review.

Thank you in advance for your prompt attention to this matter. I look forward to receiving the outstanding documents soon.

Yours faithfully,

Beata Sabolova