Ref. Ares(2021)1198626 - 11/02/2021
EUROPEAN COMMISSION
Secretariat-General
Directorate C – Transparency, Efficiency & Resources
The Director
Brussels
SG.C.1/TB
By registered mail with AR
Mr Alexander Fanta
netzpolitik.org
Rue de la Loi 155
1040 Brussels
Belgium
Copy by email:
ask+request-8895-
xxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxx.xxx
Subject:
Your application for access to documents – GESTDEM 2021/0012
Dear Mr Fanta,
I refer to your e-mail of 1 January 2021, registered on 4 January 2021, in which you
make a request for access to documents, under the above-mentioned reference number.
Please accept our apologies for the late reply to your request.
1.
SCOPE OF YOUR REQUEST
You request access to, I quote:
‘All text message exchanges between President Ursula von der Leyen and German
Chancellor Angela Merkel since the former assumed office in late 2019. The existence of
such exchanges has recently been reported in the press [1]. My request should also
include other exchanges using text and instant messaging, such as via WhatsApp,
iMessage, Signal, etc.’
2.
ASSESSMENT AND CONCLUSIONS UNDER REGULATION (EC) NO 1049/2001
We regret to inform you that the Commission does not hold any documents that would
correspond to the description given in your application.
As specified in Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001, the right of access as
defined in that regulation applies only to existing documents in the possession of the
institution.
Commission européenne/Europese Commissie, 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel, BELGIQUE/BELGIË - Tel. +32 22991111
Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 provides, in particular, that ‘[t]his
Regulation shall apply to all documents held by an institution, that is to say, documents
drawn up or received by it and in its possession, in all areas of activity of the European
Union’.
Indeed, the Commission’s definition of document to be registered is independent of the
medium in which the information is held. This is in line with the concept of ‘document’
developed by the European Court of Justice: ‘the [data in question] within the meaning of
Article 1(2) of Directive 96/9 exhibits the two essential characteristics of a document
within the meaning of Article 3(a) of Decision 2004/258 [now Regulation (EC) No
1049/2001], since it constitutes content stored in a medium.’1
However, as it was also observed by the Court, the institution is not generally obliged to
preserve each and every document: ‘[i]t should be recalled that, although Regulation
No 1049/2001 is applicable even when […] the institution concerned no longer has the
document to which access is requested and that the latter must answer the applicant and
justify before the judge its refusal of access on this basis, the said regulation cannot
oblige an institution to give access to a document which it no longer has.’2
Therefore, the Commission applies certain principles when registering documents. Please
note that as set out in Article 7(1) of Commission Decision of 6.7.2020 on records
management and archives3, ‘[d]ocuments shall be registered if they contain important
information which is not short-lived or if they may involve action or follow-up by the
Commission or one of its departments’.
Accordingly, whether a document is considered a record or not depends on whether the
information is relevant to any of the Commission’s policies, is important and not short-
lived. An SMS or another type of instant messaging is by its nature short-lived and
informal. Thus, an SMS or another type of instant messaging might qualify as a record
only in very exceptional circumstances. Within the scope of your request, the
Commission did not experience any such event that would have justified the application
of its record-keeping policy to instant messaging. The Commission therefore does not
hold any document conforming to your access request.
Given that no such documents, corresponding to the description given in your
application, are held by the Commission, the Commission is not in a position to fulfil
your request.
3.
MEANS OF REDRESS
In accordance with Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001, you are entitled to
make a confirmatory application requesting the Commission to review this position.
1 Judgment of the General Court of 22 October 2011,
Dufour v
ECB, T-436/09, paragraph 103.
2 Judgment of the General Court of 26 April 2016,
Strack v
Commission, T-221/08, paragraph 66.
3
https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/c_2020_4482_en.pdf
2
Such a confirmatory application should be addressed within 15 working days upon
receipt of this letter to the Secretariat-General of the Commission at the following
address:
European Commission
Secretariat-General
Unit C.1. ‘Transparency, Document Management and Access to Documents’
BERL 7/076
B-1049 Brussels,
or by email t
o: xxxxxxxxxx@xx.xxxxxx.xx.
Yours sincerely,
Tatjana Verrier
Director
3
Electronically signed on 11/02/2021 17:47 (UTC+01) in accordance with article 11 of Commission Decision C(2020) 4482
Document Outline