Download original attachment
(PDF file)

This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Freedom of Information request 'Split amendments Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy'.

COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AFFAIRS
Brussels, 12 July 2021 - 16.45-17.45
Secretariat - OGE/yrm
DRAFT VOTING LIST
Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy
(2021/2046(INI))
Rapporteur: Luisa Regimenti
Draft opinion: Fdr 1232958 - PE 693.676 v01-00
Amendments: (AMs 1 - 59) - Fdr 1233771 - PE 693.826 v01-00
Main committee: TRAN
Concerned
AM
Tabled by
Remarks
Rapp Vote
text
Paragraph -1 a
1 Durand, Melchior
+
(new)
Paragraph -1
4 Durand, Melchior
+
d (new)
Paragraph 1
COMP.1
+
Paragraph 1
6 Toussaint
Falls if COMP.1 adopted
+
Paragraph 1
7 Manders
Falls if COMP.1 or 6
+
adopted
Paragraph 1
8 Durand, Melchior
Falls if COMP.1 or 6
ABS
adopted
Paragraph 1a
COMP.2
+
(new)
Paragraph 1 b
10 Manders
Falls if COMP.2 adopted
+
(new)
Paragraph 1 a
9 Regimenti,
Falls if COMP.2 adopted
+
(new)
Lebreton
Paragraph -1
2 Durand, Melchior
Falls if COMP.2 adopted
+
b (new)
Paragraph 3 g
35 Toussaint
Falls if COMP.2 adopted
-
(new)
Paragraph 2
COMP.3
+
Paragraph 2
14 Manders
Falls if COMP.3 adopted
-
Deletion
Paragraph 2
15 Durand, Melchior
Falls if COMP.3 or 14
+
adopted
Paragraph 2
16 Regimenti,
Falls if COMP.3 or 14
+
Lebreton
adopted
Paragraph 2
18 Buda
Falls if COMP.3 or 14
+
adopted
Paragraph 3 k
39 Regimenti,
Falls if COMP.3 adopted
+
(new)
Lebreton
Paragraph 3 l
40 Regimenti,
Falls if COMP.3 adopted
+
(new)
Lebreton
Paragraph 3 m
41 Regimenti,
Falls if COMP.3 adopted
+
(new)
Lebreton
Paragraph 2 b
20 Toussaint
Split vote (EPP)
+
(new)
Part 1
From “Recommends that a
sustainable...” until
“citizen’s privacy and
personal data”
Part 2
-
From “calls in that respect
for...” until the end of the
amendment
Paragraph 2 c
21 Toussaint
-
(new)
Paragraph 2 d
22 Toussaint
-
(new)
Paragraph 3
COMP.4
+
Paragraph 3
23 Manders
Falls if COMP.4 adopted
+
Paragraph 3
25 Buda
Falls if COMP.4 adopted
+
Paragraph 3
26 Toussaint
Falls if COMP.4 adopted
+
Paragraph 3
27 Dzhambazki
Falls if COMP.4 adopted
+
Paragraph 1 c
11 Regimenti, Beck,
Falls if COMP.4 adopted
+
(new)
Lebreton
Paragraph 3
24 Durand, Melchior
-
Paragraph 3a
COMP.5
+
(new)
Paragraph -1 e
5 Durand, Melchior
Falls if COMP.5 adopted
ABS
(new)
Paragraph 3 a
29 Toussaint
Falls if COMP.5 adopted
ABS
(new)
Paragraph 3 d
32 Regimenti,
Split vote (EPP)
+
(new)
Lebreton
Part 1
Falls if COMP.5 adopted
From : “Highlights, in this
context, the risks of...” until
“harmonised rules on
Artificial Intelligence
(Artificial Intelligence Act)”
Part 2
+
From : “Stresses how these
risks may...” until the end of
the amendment.
Paragraph 3 e
33 Toussaint
Falls if COMP.5 adopted
ABS
(new)
Paragraph 3 b
30 Durand, Melchior
+
(new)
Paragraph 3c
31 Durand, Melchior
ABS
(new)
Paragraph 3b
COMP.6
+
(new)
Paragraph -1 c
3 Durand, Melchior
Falls if COMP.6 adopted
+
(new)
Paragraph 2
17 Toussaint
Falls if COMP.3, 14 or
-
COMP.6 adopted
Paragraph 2 a
19 Toussaint
Falls if COMP.6 adopted
-
(new)
Paragraph 3 f
34 Regimenti,
Falls if COMP.6 adopted
+
(new)
Lebreton
Paragraph 3 h
36 Regimenti,
Falls if COMP.6 adopted
+
(new)
Lebreton
Paragraph 3c
COMP.7
+
(new)
Paragraph 3
28 Melchior
Falls if COMP.4 or
+
COMP.7 adopted
Paragraph 3 i
37 Regimenti,
Falls if COMP.7 adopted
+
(new)
Lebreton
paragraph 3 j
38 Regimenti,
Falls if COMP.7 adopted
+
(new)
Lebreton
Paragraph 4
COMP.8
+
Paragraph 1 d
12 Regimenti,
Falls if COMP.8 adopted
+
(new)
Lebreton
Paragraph 3 n
42 Regimenti,
Falls if COMP.8 adopted
+
(new)
Lebreton
Paragraph 3 o
43 Regimenti,
Falls if COMP.8 adopted
+
(new)
Lebreton
Paragraph 3 p
44 Regimenti,
Falls if COMP.8 adopted
+
(new)
Lebreton
Paragraph 4
45 Durand, Melchior
Falls if COMP.8 adopted
-
Deletion
Paragraph 4
46 Toussaint
Falls if COMP.8 or 45
-
adopted
Paragraph 4
47 Manders
Falls if COMP.8 or 45
ABS
adopted
Paragraph 4 a
48 Manders
+
(new)
Paragraph 4 b
49 Toussaint
-
(new)
Paragraph 4 c
50 Regimenti,
+
(new)
Lebreton
Paragraph 5
COMP.9
+
Paragraph 5
51 Durand, Melchior
Falls if COMP.9 adopted
-
Deletion
Paragraph 5
52 Toussaint
Falls if COMP.9 or 51
-
adopted
Paragraph 5
53 Buda
Falls if COMP.9 or 51
+
adopted
Paragraph 5 d
57 Dzhambazki
Falls if COMP.9 adopted
ABS
(new)
Paragraph 1 e
13 Regimenti, Beck,
Falls if COMP.9 adopted
+
(new)
Lebreton
Paragraph 5 a
54 Regimenti,
+
(new)
Lebreton
Paragraph 5 b
55 Melchior
ABS
(new)
Paragraph 5 c
56 Melchior
ABS
(new)
Paragraph 5 e
58 Dzhambazki
ABS
(new)
Paragraph 5 f
59 Dzhambazki
-
(new)
Single vote – Text as a whole (Roll-call vote)
COMP.1 (am.7, 8 & 6)
paragraph 1
1. Recalls the role of intellectual property rights for the further development of the
sustainable and smart mobility sector in the EU (7), which is a fast-growing and innovative
sector with - among others (8) – a major social impact; calls on the Commission to continue
to incentivise R&D in multi modal transport and Mobility as a Service (MAAS)
applications by providing, where possible and applicable, public funding opportunities and
safeguarding intellectual property rights (7); considers that the Sustainable and Smart
Mobility Strategy should contribute to make the European transport sector greener,
smarter and more resilient, while leaving no one behind (6);
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COMP.2 (am.10, 9,  2 & 35)
paragraph 1a (new)
1 a (new). Considers that for the further development of sustainable and smart mobility,
the principles of safety, sustainability, efficiency and legal certainly are crucial (10);
affirms the importance of developing and investing in a mobility that is affordable and
accessible to all, safer and more sustainable; calls on the Commission and the Member
States to take these objectives into account in the implementation of an operational
multimodal trans-European transport network, equipped for sustainable and intelligent
transport, not only in environmental terms, but also in terms of social accessibility and
competitiveness of the European industrial sector (9); calls on the Commission to work
closely with Member States on the design, implementation and enforcement of trustworthy
AI standards in the Union; notes that the Union has the potential to become a global
leader in promoting a socially responsible and sustainable approach to AI technology and
its use (2); emphasises that the development, deployment and use of artificial intelligence,
robotics and related technologies, including the software, algorithms and data used or
produced by such technologies, should take into consideration their environmental
footprint during their lifecycle and across their entire supply chain, contribute to the green
transition and support the achievement of climate neutrality and circular economy goals
(35);
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COMP.3 (am.18, 15, 40, 41, 16 & 39)
paragraph 2
2. Emphasises that in a sector such as mobility, exclusive rights on data  can produce a
barrier to market entry, increased transaction costs; notes that such a barrier may be
harmful to operators, SMEs, start-ups and  the public potentially and can also be an
obstacle to the objective of not leaving anyone behind (18); calls in this respect on the
Commission and Member States to establish rules on the interoperability and portability of
data for operators and users and to address the risk of monopolies in this sector (15) and to
ensure a regulatory framework that makes the EU a fertile ground for SMEs and start-ups
to develop new technologies, also by simplifying access to credit for them (40, 41);
highlights the importance of a discussion with relevant stakeholders to move forward on
the issue of access to machine-generated data, with the aim of improving data sharing and
integration; underlines that a strong cyber-resilience, and  cooperation based on mutual
and fair data exchange between relevant actors involved ought to be the underlying
premise (16); emphasizes the importance of strengthening digital supply chain-related
industrial capabilities in the European space, including the design and manufacture of
components, software platforms, and Internet of Things (IoT) technology to further
electrify and automate transportation and mobility (39);
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COMP.4 (am. 26, 23, 25 & 11)
paragraph 3
3. Supports the use of human centric artificial intelligence for the transport of the future,
with features such as predictive maintenance, while continuing to pay attention to the
centrality of the human factor, the inherent associated risks and additional technical
challenges, particularly in terms of safety, security, reliability and in due consideration of
liability aspects (26, 25); calls therefore for European standards regarding liability of
artificial intelligence driven means of transport in order to ensure safety and legal
certainty (23); emphasizes, in this context, the importance of maintaining the EU’s
leadership in transport equipment manufacturing and services and the need of improving
global competitiveness through efficient and resilient logistics chains (25); observes that a
high level of ambition is needed to achieve social sustainability and environmental
sustainability, but that this is often a question of (ticket) prices  which might give ground
for social dumping and other similar business practices to keep costs artificially low to the
detriment of workers in the transport sector (11);
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COMP.5 (am.3, 29, 32 & 33)
paragraph 3a (new)
3a new. Recommends the development of Union-wide trustworthy AI standards for all
modes of transport, including the automotive industry, and for testing of AI-enabled
vehicles and related products and services; further highlights that the European approach
to AI technology should aim to secure people’s trust, serve the public interest, and
strengthen shared social responsibility (3, 29); highlights, in this context, the risks of the
AI use for the safety of users and operators in the transport sector  which  may result from
possible design defects or poor data quality or availability; points out in this regard the
need for specific and coordinated adjustments to the liability regimes in this area, in order
to ensure a high level of certainty for travellers and companies operating in the sector, with
particular reference to the regime of civil liability, the compensability of damages and the
distribution and satisfaction of the burden of proof on the parties, in cases where there is
the involvement of AI systems in human decisions and events involving damage to persons
or property (32); reiterates its call on the Commission to update the relevant civil liability
rules applicable to AI enabled products and services, notably in the sustainable and smart
mobility sector where the risk borne by individuals in the public space should be duly
assessed (33);
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COMP.6 (am. 19, 34, 3, 17 & 36)
paragraph 3b (new)
3b new. Recalls the need to comply with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)
when collecting and interpreting data from smart devices and mobility-related AI; recalls
in this sense that proper distinction must be made between non-personal data and personal
data (19); emphasizes the need to enable systems to protect against hacking and cyber-
attacks; highlights that clear privacy and security measures should be in place when
consumer data is being collected and used (34); in this regard, calls on the Commission to
continue to promote the uptake of AI in the transport sector and to ensure that
fundamental rights are respected, notably taking into account a human-centred approach
to AI technologies (3); recommends that unnecessary legal barriers pertaining to exclusive
rights are removed in order to unlock the potential of the use of non-personal data and to
encourage European innovation, including developments based on free and open source
software (17); highlights that any regulation or policy initiative should recognise the
context specificity of mobility and the instrumental role of public authorities and should
strengthen their capacity to achieve Europe’s green and digital objectives (36)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COMP.7 (am. 38, 37 & 28)
paragraph 3c (new)
3c (new). Stresses the importance of supporting Research and Innovation for the
development of innovative mobility technologies, as well as competitive, sustainable and
circular products and services to ensure that EU businesses remain world leaders in the
sector; considers, in addition, that the strategy should further aim to create safeguards for
workers in the sector and economic sustainability of investments for EU industry (38);
deplores the fact that the Commission's Strategy does not contain any concrete
commitments or actions towards workers; underlines the necessity of concrete policy
actions to eliminate the existing obstacles for women to join and remain in the transport
sector (37); stresses that vehicles that have high levels of advanced driving systems should
continue to put the driver at the centre of the driving task and fully autonomous vehicles
should be adequately regulated in order to negate any aggressive manoeuvres towards
other road users (28)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COMP.8 (am.43, 44, 12, 46 & 42)
paragraph 4
4.Notes that a digital ticketing system at European level might not be an appropriate solution
for the local level, as it risks diverting customers away from local companies and towards
international platforms, thus also limiting the ability of local authorities to manage mobility
in their territory; calls on the Commission to allocate specific funds for the connection of
geographically disadvantaged areas in order to promote the creation of multi-modal
infrastructure and offer a transport service that does not discriminate against any of the
Union's citizens; further urges that  plans are devised to be consistent with the specifities of
each country, in particular in densely populated areas, as well as rural, insular and
mountainous regions (43, 44, 12); stresses that alternative means need to be ensured at
more local level for public transport, with adequate associated passengers’ rights in order
to guarantee access to all public (46); recalls the potential of intelligent transport for social
inclusion, especially for the benefit of people with disabilities and reduced mobility (42);
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COMP.9 (am. 57, 53 & 13)
paragraph 5
5. Notes the results of the impact assessment 1 on the environmental effect Mobility Package
I,  published  on  18  February  2021  (57); Emphasises  that  any  revision  of  public  service
obligation (PSO) rules must reinforce dialogue at European level and include a prior correct
and professional analysis and consultation with Member States (53), regions and transport
agencies in order to identify territorial and investment priorities and the precise definition of
the ‘multimodal PSO system’ for the sake of legal certainty; calls for particular attention to be
paid to maritime territorial continuity; stresses that in order to maintain the competitiveness
of the European market it is necessary to enhance the contribution of alternative solutions
for which the EU industrial sector is a world leader, while waiting for the development of
expertise in technological contexts that are not yet mature or exclusive prerogative of non-
EU companies (13);
*******